Using a sledgehammer to crack a nut: Clinical ethics review and medical education research projects

Medical Education

Volumn 41, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 726-728

  Pugsley, Lesley ^a   Dornan, Tim ^b  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION PROGRAM; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; POSTGRADUATE EDUCATION; TEACHING; UNITED KINGDOM; ARTICLE; ETHICS; RESEARCH;

EDUCATION, MEDICAL; ETHICS, CLINICAL; RESEARCH;

EID: 34547147834     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: 13652923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02805.x     Document Type: Note

References (6)

1. General Medical Council. Tomorrow's Doctors: Recommendations on Undergraduate Medical Education. London : GMC 2003.
2. Department of Health. Modernising Medical Careers: the Next Steps. The Future Shape of Foundation, Specialist and General Practice Training Programmes. London : DoH 2004.
3. Allery L, Brigley S, MacDonald J, Pugsley L. Degrees of Difference: an Investigation of Masters and Doctorate Programmes in Medical Education. Edinburgh : Association for the Study for Medical Education 2006.
4. Robinson L, Drewery S, Ellershaw J, Smith J, Whittle S, Murdoch-Eaton D. Research governance: impeding both research and teaching? A survey of impact on undergraduate research opportunities. Med Educ 2007 41 : 729 36.
5. Department of Health, Doyal Report. The Ethical Governance and Regulation of Student Projects: Working Group on Ethical Review of Student Research in the NHS. London : DoH 2005.
6. School of Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education. Research Ethics Proforma. Cardiff : Cardiff University 2007.