More statistical and methodological myths and urban legends

Organizational Research Methods

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 279-286

  Lance, Charles E ^a  

^a The University of Georgia ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

construct validation procedures; factor analysis; meta analysis; philosophy of science; quantitative research; reliability and validity; structural equation modeling

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953330839     PISSN: 10944281     EISSN: 15527425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1094428110391814     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Aguinis, H., & Harden, E.E. (2009). Sample size rules of thumb: Evaluating three common practices. In C. E. Lance & R. J. Vandenberg (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences (pp. 269-288). New York, NY: Routledge.
2. Aguinis, H., Pierce, C.A., Bosco, F.A., Dalton, D.R., & Dalton, C.M. (2011). Debunking myths and urban legends about meta-analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 306-331.
3. Algera, J.A., Jansen, P.G.W., Roe, R.A., & Vijn, P. (1984). Validity generalization: Some critical remarks on the Schmidt-Hunter procedure. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 57, 197-210.
4. APA Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards. (2008). Reporting standards for research in psychology: Why do we need them? What might they be? American Psychologist, 63, 839-851.
5. Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
6. Barrett, G.V. (1972). Research models of the future for industrial and organizational psychology. Personnel Psychology, 25, 1-17.
7. Bentler, P.M., & Bonett, D.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
8. Brunvand, J.H. (1981). The vanishing hitchhiker: American urban legends and their meanings. New York, NY: Norton.
9. Brunvand, J.H. (1984). The choking Doberman and other "new" urban legends. New York, NY: Norton.
10. Brunvand, J.H. (1990). Curses! Broiled again! The hottest urban legends going. New York, NY: Norton.
11. Brunvand, J.H. (2001). Encyclopedia of urban legends. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
12. Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 145-153.
13. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
15. Cohen, J. (1994). The Earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist, 49, 997-1003.
16. Cortina, J.M., & Landis, R.S. (2011). The Earth is not round (p = .00). Organizational Research Methods, 14, 332-349.
17. Edwards, J.R. (2011). The fallacy of formative measurement. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 370-388.
18. Eysenck, H.J. (1978). An exercise in mega-silliness. American Psychologist, 33, 517.
19. Fauxtography. (2010). In Media mythbusters. Retrieved from http://mediamythbusters.com/index.php?title=Fauxtography.
20. Highhouse, S., & Gillespie, J.Z. (2009). Do samples really matter that much? In C. E. Lance & R. J. Vandenberg (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences (pp. 249-267). New York, NY: Routledge.
21. Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterization model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453.
22. Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
23. Hunter, J.E. (1997). Needed: A ban on the significance test. Psychological Science, 8, 3-7.
24. James, L.R., Mulaik, S.A., & Brett, J.M. (2006). A tale of two methods. Organizational Research Methods, 9, 233-244.
25. Jan Harold Brunvand. (2010). In Wikipedia. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Harold_Brunvand.
26. Joireman, J., Kamdar, D., Daniels, D., & Duell, B. (2006). Good citizens to the end? It depends: Empathy and concern with future consequences moderate the impact of a short-term time horizon on organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1307-1320.
27. Kenny, D.A., Kashy, D.A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 233-265). Burr Ridge, IL: McGraw-Hill.
28. Lance, C.E., Butts, M.M., & Michels, L.C. (2006). The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they really say? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 202-220.
29. Lance, C.E., & Vandenberg, R.J. (2008, April). Statistical/methodological myths and urban legends III: The saga continues. Symposium presented at the meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Francisco, CA.
30. Lance, C.E., & Vandenberg, R.J. (2009a). Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.
31. Lance, C.E., & Vandenberg, R.J. (2009b). Introduction. In C. E. Lance & R. J. Vandenberg (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences (pp. 1-4). New York, NY: Routledge.
32. Lance, C.E., & Vandenberg, R.J. (2010, April). Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Part V. Symposium chaired at the meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, GA.
33. Lance, C.E., & Vandenberg, R.J. (2011, April). Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Part VI. Symposium chaired at the meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago, IL.
34. Le, H., Oh, I., Shaffer, J.A., & Schmidt, F.L. (2007). Implications of methodological advances for the practice of personnel selection: How practitioners benefit from meta-analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(3), 6-15.
35. LeBreton, J.M., Wu, J., & Bing, M.N. (2009). The truth(s) on testing for mediation in the social and organizational sciences. In C. E. Lance & R. J. Vandenberg (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences (pp. 109-143). New York, NY: Routledge.
36. MacKenzie, S.B., Podsakoff, P.M., & Jarvis, C.B. (2005). The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 710-730.
37. MacKinnon, D.P., Lockwood, C.M., Hoffman, J.M., West, S.G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83-104.
38. Marsh, H.W., Balla, J.R., & McDonald, R.P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391-410.
39. Morgeson, F.P., & Humphrey, S.E. (2006). The work design questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1321-1339.
40. Neal, A., Godley, S.T., Kirkpatrick, T., Dewsnap, G., Joung, W., & Hesketh, B. (2006). An examination of learning processes during critical incident training: Implications for the development of adaptive trainees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1276-1291.
41. Podsakoff, N.P., Shen, W., & Podsakoff, P.M. (2006). The role of formative measurement models in strategic management research: Review, critique and implications for future research. In D. J. Ketchen & D. D. Bergh (Eds.), Research methodology in strategy and management (Vol. 3, pp. 197-252). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
42. Price, K.H., Harrison, D.A., & Gavin, J.H. (2006). Withholding inputs in team contexts: Member composition, interaction processes, evaluation structure, and social loafing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1375-1384.
43. Rosenthal, R., & DiMatteo, M.R. (2001). Meta-analysis: Some recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 59-82.
44. Schmidt, F.L. (1996). Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for training of researchers. Psychological Methods, 1, 115-129.
45. Schmidt, F.L., & Hunter, J.E. (2003). History, development, evolution, and impact of validity generalization and meta-analysis methods, 1975-2001. In K. R. Murphy (Ed.), Validity generalization: A critical review (pp. 31-65). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46. Schmidt, F.L., Hunter, J.E., Pearlman, K., & Hirsh, H.R. (1985). Forty questions about validity generalization and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 38, 697-798.
47. Shrout, P.E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422-445.
48. Spector, P.E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 221-232.
49. Spector, P.E., & Brannick, M. (2011). Methodological urban legends: The misuse of statistical control variables. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 287-305.
50. Trevor, C.O., & Wazeter, D.L. (2006). A contingent view of reactions to objective pay conditions: Interdependence among pay structure characteristics and pay relative to internal and external referents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1260-1275.
51. Urban legend. (2010). In Wikipedia. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urban_legend.
52. Urban legend (film). (2010). In Wikipedia. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urban_Legend_(film).
53. Vandenberg, R.J. (2004, August). Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Where pray tell did they get this idea? Symposium chaired at the meeting of the Academy of Management, New Orleans, LA.
54. Vandenberg, R.J. (2006). Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Where pray tell did they get this idea? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 194-201.
55. Vandenberg, R.J., & Lance, C.E. (2007, April). Where is the kernel of truth? Symposium presented at the meeting of the Society for Industrial and organizational Psychology, New York, NY.
56. Vandenberg, R.J., & Lance, C.E. (2009, April). Where is the kernel of truth-Part quatre? Symposium presented at the meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New Orleans, LA.
57. Williams, L.J., & Boyle, E., Jr. (2011). The myth of global fit indices and alternatives for assessing latent variable relations. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 350-369.