Reciprocal gene loss following experimental whole-genome duplication causes reproductive isolation in yeast

Evolution

Volumn 65, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 932-945

  Maclean, Calum J ^a,b   Greig, Duncan ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Allotetraploid; Divergent resolution; Polyploidy; Saccharomyces; Speciation

Indexed keywords

ALLOPATRY; CATALYST; DIVERGENCE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GENE FLOW; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOME; NUMERICAL MODEL; POLYPLOIDY; POPULATION STRUCTURE; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; RESOLUTION; SPECIES RICHNESS; TAXONOMY; YEAST;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CROSS BREEDING; FUNGAL GENOME; GENE DUPLICATION; GENETICS; KARYOTYPING; MUTAGENESIS; REPRODUCTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

CROSSES, GENETIC; GENE DUPLICATION; GENETIC SPECIATION; GENOME, FUNGAL; KARYOTYPING; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTAGENESIS; REPRODUCTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

PROTOFUNGI; SACCHAROMYCES; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 79953318793     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01171.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Bikard, D., D. Patel, C. Le Mette, V. Giorgi, C. Camilleri, M. J. Bennett, and O. Loudet 2009. Divergent evolution of duplicate genes leads to genetic incompatibilities within A. thaliana. Science 323:623-626.
2. Blanc, G., and K. H. Wolfe 2004. Widespread paleopolyploidy in model plant species inferred from age distributions of duplicate genes. Plant Cell 16:1667-1678.
3. Chou, J.-Y., Y.-S. Hung, K.-H. Lin, H.-Y. Lee, and J.-Y. Leu 2010. Multiple molecular mechanisms cause reproductive isolation between three yeast species. PLoS Biol. 8:e1000432.
4. Comai, L. 2005. The advantages and disadvantages of being polyploid. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6:836-846.
5. Comber, S. C. L., and C. Smith 2004. Polyploidy in fishes: patterns and processes. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 82:431-442.
6. Coyne, J., and H. A. Orr 2004. Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Inc, Sunderland, MA.
7. Dobzhansky, T. 1933. On the sterility of interracial hybrids in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 19:397-403.
8. Dobzhansky, T. 1934. Studies on hybrid sterility I. Spermatogenesis in pure and hybrid Drosophila pseudoobscwa. Z. Zellf. Mikrock. Anat. 21:169-223.
9. Dietrich, F. S., S. Voegeli, S. Brachat, A. Lerch, K. Gates, S. Steiner, C. Mohr, R. Pohlmann, P. Luedi, S. Choi, et al. 2004. The Ashbya gossypii genome as a tool for mapping the ancient Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Science 304:304-307.
10. Fawcett, J. A., S. Maere, and Y. Van de Peer 2009. Plants with double genomes might have had a better chance to survive the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction event. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106:5737-5742.
11. Fischer, G., S. A. James, I. N. Roberts, S. G. Oliver, and E. J. Louis 2000. Chromosomal evolution in Saccharomyces. Nature 405:451-454.
12. Gallardo, M. H., G. Kausel, A. Jimenez, C. Bacquet, C. González, J. Figueroa, N. Köhler, and R. Ojeda 2004. Whole-genome duplications in South American desert rodents (Octodontidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc 82:443-451.
13. Gerstein, A. C., H.-J. E. Chun, A. Grant, and S. P. Otto 2006. Genomic convergence toward diploidy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 2:e145.
14. Gerstein, A. C., R. M. McBride, and S. P. Otto 2008. Ploidy reduction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biol. Lett. 4:91-94.
15. Giaever, G., A. M. Chu, L. Ni, C. Connelly, L. Riles, S. Veronneau, S. Dow, A. Lucau-Danila, K. Anderson, B. Andre, et al. 2002. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 418:387-391.
16. GraphPad prism version 5.03 for windows. 2009, GraphPad Software, San Diego CA.
17. Greig, D. 2007. A screen for recessive speciation genes expressed in the gametes of F1 hybrid yeast. PLoS Genet. 3:e21.
18. Greig, D. 2008. Reproductive isolation in Saccharomyces. Heredity 102:39-44.
19. Greig, D., R. H. Borts, E. J. Louis, and M. Travisano 2002. Epistasis and hybrid sterility in Saccharomyces. Proc. R.Soc. Lond. B 269:1167-1171.
20. Hunter, N., S. R. Chambers, E. J. Louis, and R. H. Borts 1996. The mismatch repair system contributes to meiotic sterility in an interspecific yeast hybrid. Embo. J. 15:1726-1733.
21. Jaillon, O., J.-M. Aury, F. Brunet, J.-L. Petit, N. Stange-Thomann, E. Mauceli, L. Bouneau, C. Fischer, C. Ozouf-Costaz, A. Bernot, et al. 2004. Genome duplication in the teleost fish Tetraodon nigroviridis reveals the early vertebrate proto-karyotype. Nature 431:946-957.
22. Kellis, M., N. Patterson, M. Endrizzi, B. Birren, and E. S. Lander 2003. Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements. Nature 423:241-254.
23. Kellis, M., B. W. Birren, and E. S. Lander 2004. Proof and evolutionary analysis of ancient genome duplication in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 428:617-624.
24. Lee, H.-Y., J.-Y. Chou, L. Cheong, N.-H. Chang, S.-Y. Yang, and J.-Y. Leu 2008. Incompatibility of nuclear and mitochondrial genomes causes hybrid sterility between two yeast species. Cell 135:1065-1073.
25. Louis, E. J., and J. E. Haber 1990. The subtelomeric y' repeat family in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: an experimental system for repeated sequence evolution. Genetics 124:533-545.
26. Lynch, M., and A. G. Force 2000. The origin of interspecific genomic incompatibility via gene duplication. Am. Nat. 156:590-605.
27. Mable, B. K., and S. P. Otto 2001. Masking and purging mutations following EMS treatment in haploid, diploid and tetraploid yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). Genet. Res. 77:9-26.
28. Muller, H. J. 1939. Reversibility in evolution considered from the standpoint of genetics. Biol. Rev. 14:261-280.
29. Ohno, S. 1970. Evolution by gene duplication. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
30. Otto, S. P. 2007. The evolutionary consequences of polyploidy. Cell 131:452-462.
31. Pal, C., and L. D. Hurst 2003. Evidence for co-evolution of gene order and recombination rate. Nat. Genet. 33:392-395.
32. Panopoulou, G., and A. J. Poustka 2005. Timing and mechanism of ancient vertebrate genome duplications-the adventure of a hypothesis. Trends Genet. 21:559-567.
33. Scannell, D. R., A. C. Frank, G. C. Conant, K. P. Byrne, M. Woolfit, and K. H. Wolfe 2007. Independent sorting-out of thousands of duplicated gene pairs in two yeast species descended from a whole-genome duplication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:8397-8402.
34. Sémon, M., and K. H. Wolfe 2007. Reciprocal gene loss between Tetraodon and zebrafish after whole genome duplication in their ancestor. Trends Genet. 23:108-112.
35. Soltis, D. E., V. A. Albert, J. Leebens-Mack, C. D. Bell, A. H. Paterson, C. F. Zheng, D. Sankoff, C. W. dePamphilis, P. K. Wall, and P. S. Soltis 2009. Polyploidy and angiosperm diversification. Am. J. Bot. 96:336-348.
36. Taylor, J. S., Y. Van de Peer, and A. Meyer 2001. Genome duplication, divergent resolution and speciation. Trends Genet. 17:299-301.
37. Turelli, M., and H. A. Orr 2000. Dominance, epistasis and the genetics of postzygotic isolation. Genetics 154:1663-1679.
38. Van de Peer, Y. 2004. Tetraodon genome confirms Takifugu findings: most fish are ancient polyploids. Genome Biol. 5:250.
39. Werth, C. R., and M. D. Windham 1991. A model for divergent, allopatric speciation of polyploid Pteridophytes resulting from silencing of duplicate-gene expression. Am. Nat. 137:515-526.
40. Wolfe, K. H. 2001. Yesterday's polyploids and the mystery of diploidization. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2:333-341.
41. Wolfe, K. H., and D. C. Shields 1997. Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome. Nature 387:708-713.
42. Xu, H., I. Swoboda, P. L. Bhalla, and M. B. Singh 1999. Male gametic cell-specific gene expression in flowering plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:2554-2558.
43. Yamagata, Y., E. Yamamoto, K. Aya, K. T. Win, K. Doi, Sobrizal, T. Ito, H. Kanamori, J. Wu, T. Matsumoto, et al. 2010. Mitochondrial gene in the nuclear genome induces reproductive barrier in rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107:1494-1499.
44. Zhang, J. 2003. Evolution by gene duplication: an update. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18:292-298.