Using contingent ranking to estimate the loss of amenity value for inland waterways from public utility service structures

Environmental and Resource Economics

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 241-247

  Garrod, Guy ^a   Willis, Ken ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Contingent ranking; Landscape; Utilities

Indexed keywords

CANALS; UTILITY RATES; WATERWAY TRANSPORTATION;

CONTINGENT RANKING; LANDSCAPES; UTILITY SERVICE STRUCTURES;

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING;

CANAL; CONTINGENT VALUATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

UK;

EID: 0032171281     PISSN: 09246460     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1008290112833     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Beggs, S., S. Cardell and J. Hausman (1981), 'Assessing the Potential Demand for Electric Cars', Journal of Econometrics 16, 1-19.
2. British Waterways (1991), The British Waterways System: Perception and Use of the Inland Waterways. Watford: British Waterways Board.
3. British Waterways (1995), Results of 1995 Informal Visitor Survey. Watford: British Waterways Board.
4. Garrod, G. D. and K. G. Willis (1997), 'Measuring the Disamenity Associated with Pipes, Pylans and Overhead Cables at Recreational Sites', Working Paper 26. Centre for Rural Economy, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne.
5. Green, W. H. (1995), LIMDEP 7.0. Bellport: Econometric Software Inc.
6. Gujarati, D. N. (1995), Basic Econometrics: Third Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
7. Lareau, T. J. and D. A. Rae (1989), 'Valuing WTP for Diesel Odor Reductions: An Application of Contingent Ranking Technique', Southern Economic Journal 55, 728-742.
8. McFadden, D. (1974), 'On Conditional Logit Model of Qualitative Choice Behavior', in P. Zarembka, ed., Frontiers of Econometrics. New York: Academic Press.