Valuing urban green space: Hypothetical alternatives and the status quo

Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 15-35

  Bullock, Craig H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GREENSPACE; GUIDELINE; LOGIT ANALYSIS; PARK MANAGEMENT; RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT; URBAN AREA;

EID: 37249073334     PISSN: 09640568     EISSN: 13600559     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09640560701712242     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Adamowicz, V., Louviere, J. and Williams, M. (1994) Combining revealed and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26, pp. 271-292.
2. Alpizar, F., Carlsson, F. and Martinsson, P. (2002) Using Choice Experiments for Non-market Valuation, Environmental Economics Unit, Department of Economics, Goteborg University, Goteborg
3. Alvarez-Farizo, B., Hanley, N. and Barberia, T. (2001) The value of leisure time: A contingent rating approach. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 44:5, pp. 681-699.
4. Bergland, O. (2001) Choice experiments. Lecture notes for EAERE/FEEM Summer School in Environmental Valuation Methods.
5. Bristow, A. and Wardman, M. (2004) Traffic related noise and air quality valuation: Evidence from stated preference residential choice models. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 9:1, pp. 1-27.
6. Brownstone, D., Bunch, D. S. and Train, K. (2000) Joint mixed logit models of stated and revealed preference for alternative fuel vehicles. Transportation Research Part B, 34:5, pp. 315-338.
7. Campbell, D., Scarpa, R. and Hutchinson, W. G. (2007) Using mixed logit models to derive individual-specific WTP estimates for landscape improvements under agri-environmental schemes: Evidence from the Rural Environment Protection Scheme in Ireland. Choice Experiments Informing European Environmental Policy, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
8. Chapman, R. and Staelin, R. (1982) Exploiting rank ordered choice set data within the stochastic utility model. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, pp. 288-301.
9. Coughlin, R. E. and Kawashima, T. (1973) Property values and open space in Northwest Philadelphia - an empirical analysis. University of Pennsylvania
10. Cranz, G. (1989) The Politics of Park Design: A History of Urban Parks in America, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
11. Crompton, J. L. (2001) The impact of parks on property values: A review of the empirical evidence. Journal of Leisure Research, 33:1, pp. 1-31.
12. Department of the Environment (1987) A Parks Policy for Local Authorities, Stationery Office, Dublin
13. Duffy, S. (1990) A critique of open space standards applied to local authority housing in County Dublin. University College Dublin
14. Earnhart, D. (2001) Combining revealed and stated preference methods to value environmental amenities at residential locations. Land Economics, 77:1, pp. 12-29.
15. Fleischer, A. and Tsur, Y. (2003) Measuring the recreational value of open space. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 54:2, pp. 269-283.
16. Freeman, A. M. (1993) The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values - Theory and Methods, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC
17. Gormley, N. (1980) The use of public parks in Dublin. University College Dublin
18. Haider, W., Anderson, D. A., Daniel, T. C., Louviere, J. L., Orland, B. and Williams, M. (1994) Combining digital imagery and discrete choice experiments: An application to remote tourism destinations in Northern Ontario. Paper presented at Conference on Forestry and the Environment - Economic Perspectives II Banff, Alberta
19. Hanley, N., MacMillan, D., Wright, R. E., Bullock, C., Simpson, I., Parsisson, D. and Crabtree, B. (1998) Contingent valuation versus choice experiments: Estimating the benefits of environmentally sensitive areas in Scotland. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 49, pp. 413-428.
20. Hanley, N., Koop, G., Wright, R. and Alvarez-Farizo, B. (2001) Go climb a mountain: An application of recreational demand models to rock climbing. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 52:1, pp. 36-51.
21. Hanley, N., Mourato, S. and Wright, R. E. (2001) Choice modelling approaches: A superior alternative for environmental valuation?. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15:3, pp. 435-462.
22. Hauber, A. B. and Parsons, G. R. (2000) The effect of nesting structure specification on welfare estimation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 82, pp. 501-514.
23. Hensher, D., Louviere, J. and Swait, J. (1998) Combining sources of preference data. Journal of Econometrics, 89, pp. 197-221.
24. Hoehn, J. P. and Randall, A. (1987) A satisfactory benefit cost indicator from contingent valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 14:3, pp. 226-247.
25. ILO (International Labour Organization) (2003) Key Indicators of the Labour Market, ILO, Geneva
26. Irwin, E. G. (2002) The effects of open space on residential property values. Land Economics, 78:4, pp. 465-480.
27. Jacobs, J. (1961) The Death and Life of Great American Cities, Random House, New York
28. Kahneman, D. and Knetsch, D. (1992) Valuing goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 22:1, pp. 57-70.
29. Kroes, E. P. and Sheldon, R. J. (1988) Stated preference methods: An introduction. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 22:1, pp. 11-21.
30. Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A. and Swait, J. D. (2000) Stated Choice Methods, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
31. Lynch, K. (1965) The openness of open space. The Arts of Environment, Braziller, New York
32. McDonald, F. (2000) The Construction of Dublin, Gandon Editions, Kinsale, Ireland
33. Mackenzie, J. (1992) Evaluating recreational trip attribute and travel time via conjoint analysis. Journal of Leisure Research, 24:2, pp. 171-184.
34. Manski, C. F. and Lerman, S. R. (1977) The estimation of probabilities from choice based samples. Econometrica, 45, pp. 1977-1988.
35. Masatlioglu, Y. and Ele, A. O. (2005) Rational choice with status quo bias. Journal of Economic Theory, 121, pp. 1-29.
36. Meyerhoff, J. and Liebe, U. (2006) Status quo effect in choice modelling: Protest beliefs, attitudes and task complexity. Paper delivered to World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economics Kyoto
37. Moeltner, K. and Englin, J. (2001) Choice behavior under dynamic quality changes: State dependence versus 'play-it-by-ear' in selecting ski resorts. Second World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists, Monterey, pp. 1-41.
38. Oppewal, H. and Timmermans, H. (1991) Context effects and decompositional choice modelling. Papers in Regional Science, 70:2, pp. 113-131.
39. Oppewal, H., Timmermans, H. J. P. and Louviere, J. J. (1996) Modelling the effects of shopping centre size and store variety on consumer choice behaviour. Environment and Behaviour, 29:6, pp. 1073-1090.
40. Peiser, R. B. and Schwann, G. M. (1993) The private value of public open space within subdivisions. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 10:3, pp. 91-104.
41. Revelt, D. and Train, K. (1998) Mixed logit with repeated choices: households' choices of appliance efficiency level. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80:4, pp. 647-657.
42. Salkeld, G., Ryan, M. and Short, L. (2000) The veil of experience: Do consumers prefer what they know best?. Health Economics, 9, pp. 267-270.
43. Samuelson, W. and Zeckhauser, R. (1988) Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, pp. 7-59.
44. Stemerding, M. P. (1996) Leisure market segmentation: An integrated preferences/constraints-based approach. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 5:1, pp. 161-185.
45. Thaler, R. (1980) Towards a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, pp. 39-60.
46. Timmermans, H. (1988) Hierarchical information integration applied to residential choice processes. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Geographers Phoenix
47. Timmermans, H. and van Noortwijk, L. (1995) Context dependencies in housing choice behaviour. Environment and Planning A, 27, pp. 181-192.
48. Tyrväinen, L. (1997) The amenity value of the urban forest: An application of the hedonic pricing method. Landscape and Urban Planning, 37, pp. 211-222.
49. Williams, B. and Shiels, P. (2001) An Assessment of the Development Potential of Public Open Space in North Dublin, NorDubCo., Dublin