Citation lag analysis in supply chain research

Scientometrics

Volumn 87, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 221-232

  Nakamura, Hiroko ^a   Suzuki, Shinji ^a   Hironori, Tomobe ^a   Kajikawa, Yuya ^a   Sakata, Ichiro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Citation network; Knowledge diffusion; Research on research; Supply chain

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953282637     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-011-0341-x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Arntzen, B. C., Brown, G. G., Harrison, T. P., & Trafton, L. L. (1995). Global supply chain management at Digital-Equipment-Corporation. Interfaces, 25(1), 69-93.
2. Beamon, B. M. (1999). Measuring supply chain performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19(3-4), 275-292.
3. Cachon, G. P., & Lariviere, M. A. (2005). Supply chain coordination with revenue-sharing contracts: Strengths and limitations. Management Science, 51(1), 30-44.
4. Chen, F., Drezner, Z., Ryan, J. K., & Simchi-Levi, D. (2000). Quantifying the bullwhip effect in a simple supply chain: The impact of forecasting, lead times, and information. Management Science, 46(3), 436-443.
5. Chen, F., Federgruen, A., & Zheng, Y. S. (2001). Coordination mechanisms for a distribution system with one supplier and multiple retailers. Management Science, 47(5), 693-708.
6. Christopher, M. (2000). The agile supply chain-competing in volatile markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1), 37-44.
7. Dyer, J. H., Cho, D. S., & Chu, W. J. (1998). Strategic supplier segmentation: The next "best practice" in supply chain management. California Management Review, 40(2), 57-77.
8. Emmons, H., & Gilbert, S. M. (1998). Note. The role of returns policies in pricing and inventory decisions for catalogue goods. Management Science, 44(2), 276-283.
9. Ertogral, K., & Wu, S. D. (2000). Auction-theoretic coordination of production planning in the supply chain. IIE Transactions, 32(10), 931-940.
10. Fisher, M. L. (1997). What is the right supply chain for your product? Harvard Business Review, 75(2), 105-116.
11. Fleischmann, M., Beullens, P., & Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J. M. (2001). The impact of product recovery on logistics network design. Production and Operations Management, 10(2), 156-173.
12. Fox, M. S., Barbuceanu, M., & Teigen, R. (2000). Agent-oriented supply-chain management. International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, 12(2), 165-188.
13. Frohlich, M. T., & Westbrook, R. (2001). Arcs of integration: An international study of supply chain strategies. Journal of Operations Management, 19(2), 185-200.
14. Guide, V. D. R., Jayaraman, V., Srivastava, R., & Benton, W. C. (2000). Supply-chain management for recoverable manufacturing systems. Interfaces, 30(3), 125-142.
15. Gupta, A., & Maranas, C. D. (2003). Managing demand uncertainty in supply chain planning. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 27(8-9), 1219-1227.
16. Kajikawa, Y., Abe, K., & Noda, S. (2006). Filling the gap between researchers studying different materials and different methods: A proposal for structured keywords. Journal of Information Science, 32(6), 511-524.
17. LaLonde, B. J. (1998). Supply chain evolution by the numbers. Supply Chain Management Review, 2(1), 7-8.
18. Lancioni, R. A., Smith, M. F., & Oliva, T. A. (2000). The role of the Internet in supply chain management. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1), 45-56.
19. Lee, H. L. (2002). Aligning supply chain strategies with product uncertainties. California Management Review, 44(3), 105-119.
20. Lee, H. L., & Billington, C. (1993). Material management in decentralized supply chains. Operations Research, 41(5), 835-847.
21. Lee, H. L., Padmanabhan, V., & Whang, S. J. (1997a). Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Science, 43(4), 546-558.
22. Lee, H. L., Padmanabhan, V., & Whang, S. J. (1997b). The bullwhip effect in supply chain. Sloan Management Review, 38(3), 93-102.
23. Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The challenge of scientometrics: The development, measurement, and self-organization of scientific communications. Leiden University: Leiden DSWO Press.
24. Leydesdorff, L., & Amsterdamska, O. (1990). Dimensions of citation analysis. Science, Technology & Human Values, 15, 305-335.
25. Narashimhan, R., & Jayaram, J. (1998). Causal linkages in supply chain management: An exploratory study of North American manufacturing firms. Decision Sciences, 29(3), 579-605.
26. Naylor, J. B., Naim, M. M., & Berry, D. (1999). Leagility: Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1-2), 107-118.
27. Newman, M. E. J. (2004). Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. Physical Review, E 69, 066133.
28. Newman, M. E. J., & Girvan, M. (2004). Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review, E 69, 026133.
29. Oliver, R. K., & Webber, M. D. (1982). Supply-chain management: Logistics catches up with strategy. Outlook; reprinted in Christopher, M. G. (1992), Logistics, the strategic issue (pp. 63-75). London: Chapman and Hall.
30. Ozer, O., & Wei, W. (2006). Strategic commitments for an optimal capacity decision under asymmetric forecast information. Management Science, 52(8), 1238-1257.
31. Pieters, R., & Baumgartner, H. (2002). Who talks to whom? Intra- and interdisciplinary communication of economics journals. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 483-509.
32. Porter, A. L., & Chubin, D. E. (1985). Indicator of cross-disciplinary research. Scientometrics, 8(3-4), 161-176.
33. Porter, A. L., Cohen, A. S., Roessner, J. D., et al. (2007). Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity. Scientometrics, 72(1), 117-174.
34. Porter, A. L., & Rafols, I. (2009). Measuring and mapping interdisciplinarity in six research fields over time (1975-2005). Scientometrics, 81(3), 719-745.
35. Rafols, I., & Meyer, M. (2010). Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics, 82(2), 263-287.
36. Rinia, E. J., van Leeuwen, T. N., Bruins, E. E. W., et al. (2002). Measuring knowledge transfer between fields of science. Scientometrics, 54(3), 347-362.
37. Savaskan, R. C., Bhattacharya, S., & van Wassenhove, L. N. (2004). Closed-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing. Management Science, 50(2), 239-252.
38. Schummer, J. (2004). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 59(3), 425-465.
39. Stratton, R., & Warburton, R. D. H. (2003). The strategic integration of agile and lean supply. International Journal of Production Economics, 85(2), 183-198.
40. Subramani, M. (2004). How do suppliers benefit from information technology use in supply chain relationships? MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 45-73.
41. Swaminathan, J. M., Smith, S. F., & Sadeh, N. M. (1998). Modeling supply chain dynamics: A multiagent approach. Decision Sciences, 29(3), 607-632.
42. Thomas, D. J., & Griffin, P. M. (1996). Coordinated supply chain management. European Journal of Operational Research, 94(1), 1-15.
43. Tijssen, R. J. W. (1992). A quantitative assessment of interdisciplinary structures in science and technology: Co-classification analysis of energy research. Research Policy, 21(1), 27-44.
44. Tsiakis, P., Shah, N., & Pantelides, C. C. (2001). Design of multi-echelon supply chain networks under demand uncertainty. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 40(16), 3585-3604.
45. van Leeuwen, T., & Tijssen, R. (2000). Interdisciplinary dynamics of modern science: Analysis of cross-disciplinary citation flows. Research Evaluation, 9(3), 183-187.
46. Vidal, C. J., & Goetschalckx, M. (1997). Strategic production-distribution models: A critical review with emphasis on global supply chain models. European Journal of Operational Research, 98(1), 1-18.