Safety analysis for a human-friendly manipulator

International Journal of Social Robotics

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 235-252

  Haddadin, Sami ^a   Albu Schäffer, Alin ^a   Hirzinger, Gerd ^a  

^a GERMAN AEROSPACE CENTER DLR   (Germany)

Author keywords

Collision detection; Crash testing; Human friendly robot; Physical human robot interaction; Robot safety; Soft tissue injury

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENTS; AGRICULTURAL ROBOTS; CRASHWORTHINESS; MANIPULATORS; SAFETY TESTING; SOCIAL ROBOTS; TISSUE;

COLLISION DETECTION; CRASH TESTING; HUMAN-FRIENDLY ROBOTS; PHYSICAL HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTIONS; ROBOT SAFETY; SOFT-TISSUE INJURY;

LIGHT WATER REACTORS;

EID: 79953156170     PISSN: 18754791     EISSN: 18754805     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12369-010-0053-z     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Albu-Schäffer A, Ott C, Hirzinger G (2007) A unified passivity-based control framework for position, torque and impedance control of flexible joint robots. Int J Robot Res 26:23-39
2. For the Advancement of Automotive medicine, A. (1998) The Abbreviated Injury Scale (1990) Revision Update 1998. Des Plaines/IL
3. Bicchi A, Tonietti G (2004) Fast and soft arm tactics: dealing with the safety-performance trade-off in robot arms design and control. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 11:22-33
4. De Luca A, Albu-Schäffer A, Haddadin S, Hirzinger G (2006) Collision detection and safe reaction with the DLR-III lightweight manipulator arm. In: IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp 1623-1630
5. Edlich R, Rodeheaver G, Morgan R, Berman DE, Thacker J (1988) Principles of emergency wound management. Ann Emerg Med 17:1284-1302
6. Edlich R, Tafel J, Smith J, Morgan R (1987) Facitious skin wounds. Compr Ther 13:57-60
7. Eisenmenger W (2004) Handbuch gerichtliche Medizin-Spitze, scharfe und halbscharfe Gewalt. Springer, Berlin
8. EN953 (1997) Safety of Machinery-Guards-General requirements for the design and construction of fixed and movable guards
9. EuroNCAP (2003) European protocol new assessment programme-assessment protocol and biomechanical limits
10. EuroNCAP (2004) European protocol new assessment programme-frontal impact testing protocol
11. Fazekas I, Kosa F, Bajnoczky I, Jobba G, Szendrenyi J (1972) Mechanische Untersuchung der Kraft durchbohrender Einstiche an der menschlichen Haut und verschiedenen Kleidungsschichten. Z Rechtsmed 70:235-240
12. Haddadin S, Albu-Schäffer A, De Luca A, Hirzinger G (2008) Collision detection & reaction: a contribution to safe physical human-robot interaction. In: IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS2008), Nice, France, pp 3356-3363
13. Haddadin S, Albu-Schäffer A, De Luca A, Hirzinger G (2008) Evaluation of collision detection and reaction for a human-friendly robot on biological tissue. In: IARP International Workshop on Technical Challenges and for Dependable Robots in Human Environments (IARP2008), Pasadena, USA. www.robotic.de/Sami.Haddadin
14. Haddadin S, Albu-Schäffer A, Hirzinger G (2007) Safe physical human-robot interaction: measurements, analysis & new insights. In: International Symposium on Robotics Research (ISRR2007), Hiroshima, Japan, pp 439-450
15. Haddadin S, Albu-Schäffer A, Hirzinger G (2007) Safety evaluation of physical human-robot interaction via crash-testing. Robotics: Science and Systems Conference (RSS2007)
16. Haddadin S, Albu-Schäffer A, Hirzinger G (2008) The role of the robot mass and velocity in physical human-robot interaction-part I: Unconstrained blunt impacts. In: IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA2008), Pasadena, USA, pp 1331-1338
17. Haddadin S, Albu-Schäffer A, Hirzinger G (2010) Soft-tissue injury in robotics. In: IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA2010), Anchorage, Alaska
18. Heinzmann J, Zelinsky A (2003) Quantitative safety guarantees for physical human-robot interaction. Int J Robot Res 22(7-8):479-504
19. Ikuta K, Ishii H, Nokata M (2003) Safety evaluation method of design and control for human-care robots. Int J Robot Res 22(5):281-298
20. ISO10218 (2006) Robots for industrial environments-safety requirements-part 1: Robot
21. Kallieris D (2004) Handbuch gerichtliche Medizin. Springer, Berlin
22. Kuppa S (2004) Injury criteria for side impact dummies. NHTSA
23. Lau I, Viano D (1983) Role of impact velocity and chest compression in thoracic injury. Aviat Space Environ Med 56
24. Lau I, Viano D (1985) Thoracic impact: a viscous tolerance criterion. In: Tenth Experimental Safety Vehicle Conference
25. Lau I, Viano D (1986) The viscous criterion-bases and applications of an injury severity index for soft tissues. In: Proceedings of 30th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Technical Paper No 861882
26. Lim HO, Tanie K (2000) Human safety mechanisms of human-friendly robots: passive viscoelastic trunk and passively movable base. Int J Robot Res 19(4):307-335
27. McElhaney J, Stalnaker R, Roberts V (1972) Biomechanical aspects of head injury. In: Human impact response-measurement and simulation
28. NHTSA (1997) Actions to reduce the adverse effects of air bags. FMVSS No 208
29. Ott C, Albu-Schäffer A, Kugi A, Stramigioli S, Hirzinger G (2004) A passivity based cartesian impedance controller for flexible joint robots-part I: torque feedback and gravity compensation. In: IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp 2666-2672
30. Prasad P, Mertz H (1985) The position of the US delegation to the ISO working group 6 on the use of HIC in automotive environment. SAE Paper 851246
31. Prasad P, Mertz H (1991) Hybrid III sternal deflection associated with thoracic injury severities on occupants restrained with force-limiting shoulder belts. SAE Paper 910812
32. Prasad P, Mertz H, Nusholtz G (1985) Head injury risk assessment for forehead impacts. SAE Paper 960099
33. Tonietti G, Schiavi R, Bicchi A (2006) Optimal mechanical/control design for safe and fast robotics. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, vol. 21. Springer, Berlin
34. Versace J (1971) A review of the severity index. In: Proc 15th stapp conference, SAE Paper No 710881
35. Weber W, Schweitzer H (1973) Stichversuche an Leichen mit un-terschiedlicher kinetischer Energie. Beitr Gerichtl Med 31:180-184
36. Workgroup D.P.V.S. (2004) Crash analysis criteria version 1.6.1
37. Zinn M, Khatib O, Roth B (2004) A new actuation approach for human friendly robot design. Int J Robot Res 23:379-398
38. Zinn M, Khatib O, Roth B, Salisbury JK (2002) Playing it safe-human-friendly robots. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 11:12-21