Assessment of consciousness with electrophysiological and neurological imaging techniques

Current Opinion in Critical Care

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 146-151

  Bruno, Marie Aurélie ^a   Gosseries, Olivia ^a   Ledoux, Didier ^a   Hustinx, Roland ^b   Laureys, Steven ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

consciousness; electroencephalography; functional MRI; minimally conscious state; PET; vegetative state unresponsive wakefulness syndrome

Indexed keywords

BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; COGNITION; CONSCIOUSNESS DISORDER; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; DISEASE MARKER; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; EVOKED RESPONSE; FRONTAL CORTEX; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NEUROIMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERSISTENT VEGETATIVE STATE; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PROGNOSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; THALAMOCORTICAL TRACT;

DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, NEUROLOGICAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HUMANS; UNCONSCIOUSNESS;

EID: 79953126589     PISSN: 10705295     EISSN: 15317072     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e328343476d     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. Bernat JL. Chronic consciousness disorders. Annu Rev Med 2009;60:381-392. Outstanding authoritative review of the 'current state of the art'in clinical and paraclinical assessment of consciousness in coma and related conditions.
2. Jennett B. Thirty years of the vegetative state: clinical, ethical and legal problems. Prog Brain Res 2005;150:537-543. (Pubitemid 41381574)
3. Fischer C, Luaute J, Morlet D. Event-related potentials (MMN and novelty P3) in permanent vegetative or minimally conscious states. Clin Neurophysiol 2010;121:1032-1042.
4. Kotchoubey B, Kaiser J, Bostanov V, et al. Recognition of affective prosody in brain-damaged patients and healthy controls: a neurophysiological study using EEG and whole-head MEG. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2009;9:153-167.
5. Monti MM, Laureys S, Owen AM. The vegetative state. Br Med J 2010;341:292-296.
6. Majerus S, Bruno MA, Schnakers C, et al. The problem of aphasia in the assessment of consciousness in brain-damaged patients. Prog Brain Res 2009;177:49-61. This article addresses the difficulties of making inferences about consciousness when looking for command following (at the bedside or using fMRI) in braindamaged patients who may have speech comprehension problems.
7. Bruno MA, Fernandez-Espejo D, Lehembre R, et al. Multimodal neuroimaging in patients with disorders of consciousness showing 'functional hemispherectomy'. Prog Brain Res (in press). Illustration of the complementarity of PET, fMRI resting state, high-density EEG and diffusion tensor imaging MRI in the assessment of patients with DOC.
8. Laureys S, Celesia G, Cohadon F, et al. Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: a new name for the vegetative state or apallic syndrome. BMC Med 2010;8:68. 'Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome'is here proposed by the European Task Force on Disorders of Consciousness as an alternative name for the 'vegetative state'an over 35-year-old syndrome with an unintended albeit persistently negative connotation.
9. Giacino JT, Schnakers C, Rodriguez-Moreno D, et al. Behavioral assessment in patients with disorders of consciousness: gold standard or fool's gold? Prog Brain Res 2009;177:33-48.
10. Bruno MA, Schnakers C, Damas F, et al. Locked-in syndrome in children: report of five cases and review of the literature. Pediatr Neurol 2009;41:237-246. Discussion of the medical and ethical challenges encountered in five cases of locked-in syndrome in children.
11. Monti MM, Coleman MR, Owen AM. Neuroimaging and the vegetative state: resolving the behavioral assessment dilemma? Ann N y Acad Sci 2009;1157:81-89.
12. Schnakers C, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Giacino J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment. BMC Neurol 2009;9:35. A milestone study confirming the high misdiagnosis rate in vegetative state/UWS, apparently unchanged over the past 15 years and demonstrating the usefulness of standardized validated behavioral assessment tools as compared to unstructured routine neurological assessment in DOC.
13. Demertzi A, Schnakers C, Ledoux D, et al. Different beliefs about pain perception in the vegetative and minimally conscious states: a European survey of medical and paramedical professionals. Prog Brain Res 2009;177:329-338. Important survey assessing healthcare givers'beliefs on possible pain perception in DOC and discussing its impact on treatment options.
14. Schnakers C, Chatelle C, Vanhaudenhuyse A, et al. The Nociception Coma Scale: a new tool to assess nociception in disorders of consciousness. Pain 2010;148:215-219. Presentation of a new bedside scale permitting to standardize the evaluation and monitoring of pain in noncommunicative brain-damaged patients - its real clinical usefulness awaits to be demonstrated.
15. Owen AM, Schiff ND, Laureys S. A new era of coma and consciousness science. Prog Brain Res 2009;177:399-411. Authoritative review of the field's pioneers on the rapid technological developments in the field of neuroimaging producing a cornucopia of new techniques for examining both the structure and function of the human brain in vivo in DOC.
16. Newcombe VF, Williams GB, Scoffings D, et al. Aetiological differences in neuroanatomy of the vegetative state: insights from diffusion tensor imaging and functional implications. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2010;81:552-561.
17. Fernandez-Espejo D, Bekinschtein T, Monti MM, et al. Diffusion weighted imaging distinguishes the vegetative state from the minimally conscious state. Neuroimage 2010;1:103-112. An original study on the diagnostic role of MRI white matter tract integrity assessment in DOC.
18. Phillips CL, Bruno MA, Maquet P, et al. 'Relevance vector machine'consciousness classifier applied to cerebral metabolism of vegetative and lockedin patients. Neuroimage 2010. Illustration of the usefulness of an automated user-independent classifier disentangling unconscious from 'locked-in'brain damaged patients using cerebral PET metabolic imaging, outperforming the human eye.
19. Bruno MA, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Schnakers C, et al. Visual fixation in the vegetative state: an observational case series PET study. BMC Neurol 2010;10:35. A interesting novel approach of correlating specific behavioral signs in DOC with functional neuroimaging results - hence helping to identify their underlying functional neuroanatomy and possible reflection of conscious awareness.
20. Vanhaudenhuyse A, Demertzi A, Schabus M, et al. Two distinct neuronal networks mediate the awareness of environment and of self. J Cogn Neurosci 2011;23:570-578.
21. Boly M, Tshibanda L, Vanhaudenhuyse A, et al. Functional connectivity in the default network during resting state is preserved in a vegetative but not in a brain dead patient. Hum Brain Mapping 2009;30:2393-2400.
22. Vanhaudenhuyse A, Noirhomme Q, Tshibanda LJ, et al. Default network connectivity reflects the level of consciousness in noncommunicative braindamaged patients. Brain 2010;133:161-171. 'The brain never rests'as illustrated by this 'resting state'fMRI study in locked-in, minimally conscious, unresponsive and comatose patients showing the potential diagnostic value of recording the brain's activity without any stimulation or task currently awaiting assessment of its possible prognostic value.
23. Cauda F, Micon BM, Sacco K, et al. Disrupted intrinsic functional connectivity in the vegetative state. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009;80:429-431.
24. Bruno MA, Soddu A, Demertzi A, et al. Disorders of consciousness: moving from passive to resting state and active paradigms. Cogn Neurosci 2010;1:193-203.
25. Qin P, Di H, Liu Y, et al. Anterior cingulate activity and the self in disorders of consciousness. Hum Brain Mapping 2010;31:1993-2002.
26. Monti MM, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Coleman MR, et al. Willful modulation of brain activity in disorders of consciousness. N Engl J Med 2010;362:579-589. Milestone article on the potential of functional MRI to bridge the possible - albeit infrequent - dissociation between behavior that is observable during clinical assessment and the actual level of residual cognitive function and communication as offered by fMRI.
27. Soddu A, Boly M, Nir Y, et al. Reaching across the abyss: recent advances in functional magnetic resonance imaging and their potential relevance to disorders of consciousness. Prog Brain Res 2009;177:261-274.
28. Stins JF, Laureys S. Thought translation, tennis and Turing tests in the vegetative state. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 2009;8:361-370.
29. Rodriguez Moreno D, Schiff ND, Giacino J, et al. A network approach to assessing cognition in disorders of consciousness. Neurology 2010;75:1871-1878.
30. Sorger B, Dahmen B, Reithler J, et al. Another kind of 'BOLD Response': answering multiple-choice questions via online decoded single-trial brain signals. Prog Brain Res 2009;177:275-292. A study showing fMRI brain computer interface 'multiple-choice'communication in healthy volunteers - awaiting validation in DOC.
31. Millan JD, Rupp R, Muller-Putz GR, et al. Combining brain-computer interfaces and assistive technologies: state-of-the-art and challenges. Front Neurosci 2010;4:1-15.
32. Schnakers C, Majerus S, Goldman S, et al. Cognitive function in the locked-in syndrome. J Neurol 2008;255:323-330.
33. Bekinschtein TA, Dehaene S, Rohaut B, et al. Neural signature of the conscious processing of auditory regularities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:1672-1677.
34. Tshibanda L, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Galanaud D, et al. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy and diffusion tensor imaging in coma survivors: promises and pitfalls. Prog Brain Res 2009;177:215-229.
35. Tshibanda L, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Boly M, et al. Neuroimaging after coma. Neuroradiology 2010;52:15-24. Timely review on advanced MRI techniques such as spectroscopy, diffusion tensor imaging and 'activation'and 'resting- state'functional MRI that were recently introduced in the assessment of patients with disorders of consciousness.
36. Tollard E, Galanaud D, Perlbarg V, et al. Experience of diffusion tensor imaging and 1H spectroscopy for outcome prediction in severe traumatic brain injury: preliminary results. Crit Care Med 2009;37:1448-1455. Important study on the use of structural MRI disentangling bad from good outcome after brain trauma and coma in adults, awaiting the results from ongoing larger multicentric studies.
37. Fernandez-Espejo D, Junque C, Cruse D, et al. Combination of diffusion tensor and functional magnetic resonance imaging during recovery from the vegetative state. BMC Neurol 2010;10:77.
38. Machado C, Rodriguez R, Carballo M, et al. Brain anatomy, cerebral blood flow, and connectivity in the transition from PVS to MCS. Rev Neurosci 2009;20:177-180.
39. Aaen GS, Holshouser BA, Sheridan C, et al. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy predicts outcomes for children with nonaccidental trauma. Pediatrics 2010;125:295-303. Important study on the use of structural MRI disentangling bad from good outcome after brain trauma and coma in children.
40. Di H, Boly M, Weng X, et al. Neuroimaging activation studies in the vegetative state: predictors of recovery? Clin Med 2008;8:502-507.
41. Coleman MR, Davis MH, Rodd JM, et al. Towards the routine use of brain imaging to aid the clinical diagnosis of disorders of consciousness. Brain 2009;132:2541-2552. Milestone series on the use of activation fMRI studies in predicting outcome from vegetative state/UWS and minimally conscious state patients.
42. Bagnato S, Boccagni C, Prestandrea C, et al. Prognostic value of standard EEG in traumatic and nontraumatic disorders of consciousness following coma. Clin Neurophysiol 2010;121:274-280.
43. Babiloni C, Sara M, Vecchio F, et al. Cortical sources of resting-state alpha rhythms are abnormal in persistent vegetative state patients. Clin Neurophysiol 2009;120:719-729.
44. Cologan V, Schabus M, Ledoux D, et al. Sleep in disorders of consciousness. Sleep Med Rev 2010;14:97-105. Exhaustive review on the understudied field of EEG assessment of sleep in coma and related disorders.
45. Cavinato M, Freo U, Ori C, et al. Postacute P300 predicts recovery of consciousness from traumatic vegetative state. Brain Inj 2009;23:973-980.
46. Bekinschtein TA, Shalom DE, Forcato C, et al. Classical conditioning in the vegetative and minimally conscious state. Nat Neurosci 2009;12:1343-1349. Landmark neuroscience article showing associative learning (conditioning) in some cases of 'vegetative'state.
47. Laureys S. The neural correlate of (un) awareness: lessons from the vegetative state. Trends Cogn Sci 2005;9:556-559. (Pubitemid 41677486)
48. Murphy M, Bruno MA, Riedner B, et al. Propofol anesthesia and sleep: a high-density EEG study. Sleep (in press). Using high-density EEG and cortical source modeling, this article shows that pharmacological loss of consciousness (in propofol anesthesia) differs from the fading consciousness during sleep. Results from ongoing studies using this approach in pathological unconsciousness and coma are awaited.
49. Noirhomme Q, Boly M, Bonhomme V, et al. Bispectral index correlates with regional cerebral blood flow during sleep in distinct cortical and subcortical structures in humans. Arch Ital Biol 2009;147:51-57.
50. Vanhaudenhuyse A, Boly M, Balteau E, et al. Pain and nonpain processing during hypnosis: athulium-YAG event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage 2009;47:1047-1054.
51. Demertzi A, Soddu A, Faymonville M-E, et al. Hypnotic modulation of resting state fMRI default mode and extrinsic network connectivity. Prog Brain Res (in press).
52. Boveroux P, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Bruno MA, et al. Breakdown of within-and between-network resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging connectivity during propofol-induced loss of consciousness. Anesthesiology 2010;113:1038-1053. An anesthesia study demonstrating the critical role of thalamocortical connectivity in the genesis of conscious perception concluding that both within-network and between-network connectivity and communication between low-level sensory and higher-order frontopariet al cortices are necessary for perception of external sensory stimuli.
53. Lapitskaya N, Coleman MR, Nielsen JF, et al. Disorders of consciousness: further pathophysiological insights using motor cortex transcranial magnetic stimulation. Prog Brain Res 2009;177:191-200.
54. Silva S, Alacoque X, Fourcade O, et al. Wakefulness and loss of awareness: brain and brainstem interaction in the vegetative state. Neurology 2010;74:313-320.
55. Lull N, Noe E, Lull JJ, et al. Voxel-based statistical analysis of thalamic glucose metabolism in traumatic brain injury: relationship with consciousness and cognition. Brain Inj 2010;24:1098-1107. Important PET study confirming the role of metabolic thalamic dysfunction in DOC.
56. Fernandez-Espejo D, Junque C, Bernabeu M, et al. Reductions of thalamic volume and regional shape changes in the vegetative and the minimally conscious states. J Neurotrauma 2010;27:1187-1193. Important MRI study highlighting the role of structural thalamic damage in DOC.
57. Demertzi A, Liew C, Ledoux D, et al. Dualism persists in the science of mind. Ann N y Acad Sci 2009;1157:1-9.
58. Coleman MR, Bekinschtein T, Monti MM, et al. A multimodal approach to the assessment of patients with disorders of consciousness. Prog Brain Res 2009;177:231-248.
59. Schiff ND. Recovery of consciousness after brain injury: a mesocircuit hypothesis. Trends Neurosci 2010;33:1-9.
60. Demertzi A, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Bruno MA, et al. Is there anybody in there? Detecting awareness in disorders of consciousness. Expert Rev Neurother 2008;8:1719-1730.
61. Schnakers C, Hustinx R, Vandewalle G, et al. Measuring the effect of amantadine in chronic anoxic minimally conscious state. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008;79:225-227. (Pubitemid 351236567)
62. Kim YW, Shin JC, An YS. Effects of methylphenidate on cerebral glucose metabolism in patients with impaired consciousness after acquired brain injury. Clin Neuropharmacol 2009;32:335-339.
63. Fins JJ. Neuroethics and neuroimaging: moving toward transparency. Am J Bioeth 2008;8:46-52.
64. Schiff ND, Giacino JT, Fins JJ. Deep brain stimulation, neuroethics, and the minimally conscious state: moving beyond proof of principle. Arch Neurol 2009;66:697-702.
65. Fins JJ, Schiff ND. Conflicts of interest in deep brain stimulation research and the ethics of transparency. J Clin Ethics 2010;21:125-132.