Preparation and characterization of porous scaffolds with favourable interpore connectivity

Wuji Cailiao Xuebao/Journal of Inorganic Materials

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 17-21

  Guo, Lai Yang ^a   Zhang, Jing Wei ^a   Zhao, Jing ^a   Wang, Jian Xin ^a   Weng, Jie ^a   Zhang, Cong ^b  

^a SOUTHWEST JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b 452nd Hospital of Chinese PLA   (China)

Author keywords

Bridging; Interpore connectivity; Particulate leaching; Porous scaffolds

Indexed keywords

BONE TISSUE ENGINEERING; BRIDGING; CELL COMPATIBILITY; CERAMIC SCAFFOLDS; INTERCONNECTED PORES; INTERPORE CONNECTIVITY; KEY FACTORS; PARTICULATE-LEACHING; PORE INTERCONNECTIVITY; POROGENS; POROUS BIOCERAMIC; POROUS CERAMIC SCAFFOLDS; POROUS SCAFFOLD; VOLUMETRIC POROSITY;

BENZENE; BIOCERAMICS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; LEACHING; POROSITY; SHRINKAGE; SPHERES;

SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY);

EID: 79953018923     PISSN: 1000324X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1077.2011.00017     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Ma P X. Biomimetic materials for tissue engineering. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2008, 60(2): 184-198.
2. Lien S M, Ko L Y, Huang T J. Effect of pore size on ECM secretion and cell growth in gelatin scaffold for articular cartilage tissue engineering. Acta Biomaterialia, 2009, 5(2): 670-679.
3. Wang H N, Li Y B, Zuo Y, et al. Biocompatibility and osteogenesis of biomimetic nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 2007, 28(22): 3338-3348.
4. Hutmacher D W. Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials, 2000, 21(24): 2529-2543.
5. Ma P X. Scaffolds for tissue fabrication. Materials Today, 2004, 7(5): 30-40.
6. Tadic D, Beckmann F, Schwarz K, et al. A novel method to produce hydroxyapatite objects with interconnecting porosity that avoid singtering. Biomaterials, 2004, 25(16): 3335-3340.
7. Gauthier O, Bouler J M, Aguado E, et al. Macroporous biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics influence of macropore diameter and macroporosity percentage on bone ingrowth. Biomaterials, 1998, 19(3): 133-139.
8. Carine W, Brigitte G, Christelle L, et al. Biomaterial surface properties modulate in vitro rat calvaria osteoblasts response: roughness and or chemistry? Materials Science and Engineering C, 2008, 28(5/6): 990-1001.
9. Ponsonnet L, Reybier K, Jaffrezic N, et al. Relationship between surface properties (roughness, wettability) of titanium and titanium alloys and cell behaviour. Materials Science and Engineering C, 2003, 23(4): 551-560.
10. Sánchez-Salcedo S, Nieto A, Vallet-Regí M. Hydroxyapatite/β-tricalcium phosphate/agarose macroporous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2008, 137(1): 62-71.
11. Woodarda J R, Hilldore A J, Lan S K, et al. The mechanical properties and osteoconductivity of hydroxyapatite bone scaffolds with multi-scale porosity. Biomaterials, 2007, 28(1): 45-54.
12. Zhao J, Guo L Y, Yang X B, et al. Preparation of bioactive porous HA/PCL composite scaffolds. Applied Surface Science, 2008, 255(5): 2942-2946.
13. 3. Journal of Biomedical Materials Reseach. 1998, 39(1): 77-85.
14. Liu Y R, Qu S X, Maitz M F, et al. The effect of the major components of salvia miltiorrhiza bunge on bone marrow cells. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 2007, 111(3): 573-583.