video technology and home entertainment

Communication Technology and Social Change: Theory and Implications

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 167-182

  Grant, August E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953018716     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410615411     Document Type: Chapter

References (67)

1. Abelman, R., & Atkin, D. (2002). The televiewing audience. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
2. Andreason, M. (2000). Evolution in the family’s use of television: An overview. In J. Bryant & J. A. Bryant (Eds.), Television and the American family (pp. 3-30). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoicates.
3. Atkin, D. (2000). The home ecology of children’s television viewing. In J. Bryant & J. A. Bryant (Eds.), How children view television (pp. 49-74). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Atkin, D., Jeffres, L., Neuendorf, K. (1998). Understanding Internet adoption as telecom-munication behavior. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media,42, 475.
5. Atkin, D., Neuendorf, K., Jeffres, L., & Skalski, P. (2003). Predictors of audience interest in adopting digital television. Journal of Media Economics, 16(3), 159-173.
6. Bracken, C., & Atkin, D. (2004). How screen size affects perception of television. Visual Communication Quarterly, 9, 9-14.
7. Brown, D. (2006). Communication technology timeline. In A. E. Grant & J. H. Meadows (Eds.), Communication technology update (pp. 7-45). Boston: Focal Press.
8. Bryant, J., & Bryant, J. A. (2000). How children view television. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Childers, T., & Krugman, D. (1987). The competitive environment of pay-per-view. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 31(3), 335-342.
10. Davis, R. (1999). The web of politics: The Internet’s impact on the American political sys-tem. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Dick, S. J. (2004). Home video technology. In A. E. Grant & J. H. Meadows (Eds.), Communication technology update (9th ed., pp. 216). Boston: Focal.
12. Dimmick, J. (2003). Media competition and coexistence: The theory of niche. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Dobrow, J. (1990a). Social and cultural aspects of VCR use. Hillsdale, NJ: Ablex.
14. Dobrow, J. (1990b). The re-run ritual: Using VCRs to re-view. In Social and cultural aspects of VCR use (pp. 181-194). Hillsdale, NJ: Ablex.
15. Dupagne, M. (2002). Adoption of high-definition television in the United States: An Edsel in the making? In C. Lin & D. Atkin (Eds.), Communication technology and social change: Audience adoption and uses (pp. 279-306). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
16. Dupagne, M. & Seel, P. B. (2006). Digital television. In A. E. Grant & J. H. Meadows (Eds.), Communication technology update (10th ed., pp. 49-69). Boston: Focal Press.
17. Ferguson, D. A., & Perse, E. M. (1993). Media and audience influences on channel reper-toire. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 37, 31-47.
18. Ferguson, D. A., & Perse, E. M. (2004). Audience satisfaction among TiVo and ReplayTV users. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 4(2).
19. Grant, A. E. (1993a). Prospects for video on demand. New Telecom Quarterly, 1(3), 51-55.
20. Grant, A. E. (1993b). HDTV: An assessment of impacts and applications. New Telecom Quarterly, 1(2), 38-45.
21. Grant, A. E. (2004). The umbrella perspective on communication technology. In A. E. Grant & J. H. Meadows (Eds.), Communication technology update (9th ed., pp. 1-6). Boston: Focal.
22. Greenberg, B. S., & Lin, C. A. (1989). Adolescents and the VCR boom: Old, new, and nonusers. In M. R. Levy (Ed.), The VCR age: Home video and mass communication(pp. 73-91). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23. Heeter, C. (1985) Program selection with abundance of choice: A process model. Human Communication Research, 12, 126-152.
24. Henke, L., & Donohue, T. (1989). Functional displacement of traditional TV viewing by VCR owners. Journal of Advertising Research, 29(2), 18-23.
25. Jeffres, L., & Atkin, D. (1996). Predicting use of technologies for communication and con-sumer needs. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media,40, 318-330.
26. Jeffres, L. W., Atkin, D. J., Neuendorf, K. A., & Lin, C. A. (2004). The influence of expanding media menus on audience content selection. Telematics and Informatics, 21(4), 317-334.
27. Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In J. G. Blumler & E. Katz (Eds.), The uses of mass communication(pp. 19-32). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
28. Klopfenstein, B. (2002). The Internet and Web as communication media. In C. Lin & D. Atkin (Eds.), Communication technology and society: Audience adoption and uses(pp. 353-378). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Klopfenstein, B. C., Spears, S. C., & Ferguson, D. A. (1991). VCR attitudes and behaviors by length of ownership. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 35(4), 525-531.
30. Komiya, M., & Litman, B. (1990). The economics of the prerecorded videocassette indus-try. In J. Dobrow (Ed.), Social and cultural aspects of VCR use (pp. 25). Hillsdale, NJ: Ablex.
31. Krendl, K. A., Clark, G., Dawson, R., & Troiano, C. (1993). Preschoolers and VCRs in the home: A multiple methods approach. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 37(3), 293-312.
32. Krugman, D. M., & Johnson, K. F. (1991). Differences in the consumption of traditional broadcast and VCR movie rentals. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 35, 213-232.
33. Krugman, D. M., & Rust, R. T. (1993). The impact of cable penetration and VCR penetration on network viewing: Assessing the decade. Journal of Advertising Research, 35, 213-232.
34. Lasswell, H. (1948). The structure and function of comunication in society. In L. Bryson (Ed.), The communication of ideas (pp. 37-51). New York: Harper.
35. Levy, M. R. (1981). Home video recorders and time shifting. Journalism Quarterly,401-405.
36. Levy, M. R. (1989). The VCR age: Home video and mass communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37. Lin, C. A. (1990). Audience activity and VCR use. In J. Dobrow (Ed.), Social and cultural aspects of VCR use (pp. 75-92). Hillsdale, NJ: Ablex.
38. Lin, C. A. (1992). The functions of the VCR in the home leisure environment. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 36, 345-351.
39. Lin, C. A. (1993). Exploring the role of the VCR in the emerging home entertainment cul-ture. Journalism Quarterly, 70, 833-842.
40. Lin. C. A. (1994). Audience fragmentation in a competitive video marketplace. Journal of Advertising Research, 34(4), 30-38.
41. Lin, C. A. (1996). Looking back: The contribution of Blumler and Katz’s Uses of mass communication to communication research. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40, 571.
42. Lin, C. A. (2000). The VCR, home video culture, and new media technologies. In J. Bryant & J. A. Bryant (Eds.), Television and the American family (pp. 91). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43. Lin, C. A. (2001). Audience attributes, media supplementation and likely online service adoption. Mass Communication & Society, 4(1), 19.
44. Lin, C. A. (2002). A paradigm for communication and information technology adoption research. In C. A. Lin & D. Atkin (Eds.), Communication technology and society: Audience adoption and uses (pp. 447). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
45. Lin. C. A., & Atkin, D. (2002). Communication technology and society: Audience adop-tion and uses (pp. 23-42). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
46. Lin, C. A., & Jeffres, L. W. (1998). Factors influencing the adoption of multimedia cable technology. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 75, 341-352.
47. McCombs, M. E., & Nolan, J. (1992). The relative constancy approach to consumer spend-ing for media. Journal of Media Economics, 5(2), 43-52.
48. Media InfoCenter. (2005a). Media consumption based on hours per person. Retrieved June 9, 2005, from http://www.mediainfocenter.org/film/competition/consumption.asp
49. Media InfoCenter. (2005b). Communication industry revenue. Retrieved June 9, 2005, from http://www.mediainfocenter.org/compare/revenues/tot_revenues.asp
50. Media InfoCenter. (2005c). Channels receivable vs. viewed. Retrieved June 9, 2005, from http://www.mediainfocenter.org/television/size/r_vs_viewed.asp
51. Media InfoCenter. (2005d). Time spent viewing-Households. Retrieved September 19, 2005, from http://www.mediainfocenter.org/television/tv_aud/time_house.asp
52. Montgomery, K. C. (2000). Children’s media culture in the new millennium: Mapping the digital landscape. In The future of children: Children and computer technology (Vol. 10, part 2, pp. 145-167). Los Altos, CA: David and Lucille Packard Foundation.
53. Morgan, M., Alexander, A., Shanahan, J., & Harris, C. (1990). Adolescents, VCRs, and the family environment. Communication Research, 17, 83-106.
54. National Cable & Telecommunications Association. (2005). Industry statistics. Retrieved November 10, 2005, from http://www.ncta.com/Docs/PageContent.cfm?pageID=86.
55. Neuendorf, K., Atkin, D., & Jeffres, L. (2001). Reconceptualizing channel repertoire in the urban cable environment. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45(3), 464.
56. Nielsen Media. (2005). Annual report on viewing. New York: Author.
57. Noh, G. Y., & Grant, A. E. (1997). Media functionality and the principle of relative constancy: An explanation of the VCR aberration. Journal of Media Economics, 10(3), 17-31.
58. Reagan, J. (2002). The difficult world of predicting telecommunication innovations: Factors affecting adoption. In C. A. Lin & D. Atkin (Eds.), Communication technology and society: Audience adoption and uses (pp. 65-87). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
59. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
60. Rubin, A. M., & Bantz, C. R. (1989). Uses and gratifications of videocassette recorders. In J. Salvaggio & J. Bryant (Eds.), Media use in the information age: Emerging patterns of adoption and use (pp. 181). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
61. Rubin, A. M., & Eyal, K. (2002). The videocassette recorder in the home media environ-ment. In C. A. Lin & D. J. Atkin (Eds.), Communication technology and society: Audience adoption and uses (pp. 329-349). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
62. Rubin, A. M., & Rubin, R. B. (1989). Social and psychological antecedents of VCR use. In M. R. Levy (Ed.), The VCR age: Home video and mass communication (pp. 92-111). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
63. Sapolsky, B. S., & Forrest, E. (1989). Measuring VCR “ad-voidance.” In M. R. Levy (Ed.), The VCR age: Home video and mass communication (pp. 148-167). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
64. Secunda, E. (1990). VCRs and viewer control over programming: An historical perspec-tive. In J. Dobrow (Ed.), Social and cultural aspects of VCR use (pp. 9-24). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
65. Snider, M. (2005, January 6). DVD continues spinning success. USA Today. Retrieved June 30, 2005, from http://www.usatoday.com/life/movies/news/2005-01-05-dvd-sales- inside_x.htm
66. Waterman, D. (1985). Prerecorded home video and the distribution of theatrical feature films. In E. Noam (Ed.), Video media competition: Regulation, economics and technol-ogy (pp. 221-243). New York: Columbia University Press.
67. Waterman, D., & Grant, A. E. (1991). Cable television as an aftermarket. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 35(2), 179-188.