Effects of false-alarm vs. miss-prone automation and likelihood alarm technology on trust, reliance, and compliance in a miss-prone task

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn 2, Issue , 2010, Pages 1513-1517

  Davenport, Randy B ^a   Bustamante, Ernesto A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION DESIGN; MP SYSTEMS; PRIMARY TASK;

ALARM SYSTEMS; AUTOMATION; SPACE SHUTTLES; UNMANNED VEHICLES;

ERGONOMICS;

EID: 79952971192     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1518/107118110X12829370088642     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Bailey, N., & Scerbo, M. (2007). Automation-induced complacency for monitoring highly reliable systems: the role of task complexity, system experience, and operator trust. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 8(4), 321-348.
2. Breznitz, S. (1983). Cry-wolf: The psychology of false alarms. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Bustamante, E. A. (2008). Implementing likelihood alarm technology in integrated aviation displays for enhancing decision making: A two-stage signal detection modeling approach. International Journal of Applied Aviation Studies, 8(2), 241-262.
4. Bustamante, E. A. (2009). A reexamination of the mediating effects of trust among alarm systems' characteristics and human compliance and reliance. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, USA 53, 249-253.
5. Bustamante, E. A., Bliss, J. P., & Anderson, B. L. (2007). Effects of varying the threshold of alarm systems and workload on human performance. Ergonomics, 50(7), 1127-1147. (Pubitemid 46839735)
6. Clark, R. M., Peyton, G. G., & Bustamante, E. A. (2009). Differential effects of likelihood alarm technology and false-alarm vs. miss prone automation on decision making. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, USA 53, 349-353.
7. Comstock, J. R. & Arnegard, R. J. (1992). The multi-attribute task battery for human operator workload and strategic behavior research (NASA Technical Memorandum No. 104174) Hampton, VA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley Research Center.
8. Dixon, S.R. & Wickens, C. D. (2006). Automation reliability in unmanned aerial vehicle control: A reliance-compliance model of automation dependence in high workload. Human Factors, 48(3), 474-486. (Pubitemid 44639231)
9. Dixon, S. R., Wickens, C. D., & McCarley, J. S. (2007). On the independence of compliance and reliance: Are automation false alarms worse than misses?. Human Factors, 49(4), 564-572. (Pubitemid 47122687)
10. Fallon, Bustamante, & Bliss (2005). Enhancing perceived situation awareness and reducing perceived workload with a likelihood alarm display. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, USA 49, 1677-1681.
11. Lee, J. D. & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46(1), 50-80. (Pubitemid 44490367)
12. Madhavan, P. & Wiegmann, D. A. (2007). Effects of information source, pedigree, and reliability on operator interaction with decision support systems. Human Factors, 49(5), 773-785. (Pubitemid 47442101)
13. Meyer, J. (2001). Effects of warning validity and proximity on responses to warnings. Human Factors, 43(4), 563-572.
14. Meyer, J. (2004). Conceptual issues in the study of dynamic hazard warnings. Human Factors, 46(2), 196-204.
15. Parasuraman, R. & Miller, C. A. (2004). Trust and etiquette in high criticality automated systems. Communications of the ACM, 47(4), 51-55.
16. Parasuraman, R. & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39(2), 230-253.
17. Stanton, N. S., Ragsdale, S. A., & Bustamante, E. A. (2009). The effects of system technology and probability type on trust, compliance, and reliance. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, USA 53, 1368-1372.
18. Swets, J. A. (1992). The science of choosing the right decision threshold in high-stakes diagnostics. American Psychologist, 47(4), 522-532.
19. Wickens, C. D. & Dixon, S. R. (2007). The benefits of imperfect diagnostic automation: a synthesis of the literature. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 8(3), 201-212.