Enhancing perceived situation awareness and reducing perceived workload with a likelihood alarm display

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 1677-1681

  Fallon, Corey K ^a   Bustamante, Ernesto A ^a   Bliss, James P ^a  

^a OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALARM SYSTEMS; DISPLAY DEVICES; PSYCHOLOGY COMPUTING; STUDENTS;

EXPERIMENTAL SESSIONS; SITUATION AWARENESS;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 44349178019     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1177/154193120504901738     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Bliss, J. P., Jeans, S. M., & Prioux, H. J. (1996). Dual-task performance as a function of individual alarm validity and alarm system reliability information. In Proceedings of the IEA 1996/HFES 1996 Congress (1237-1241). Santa Monica, CA: International Ergonomics Association/Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
2. Bustamante, E. A., Anderson, B. L., & Bliss, J. P. (2004). Effects of varying the threshold of alarm systems and task complexity on human performance and perceived workload. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting (1948-1952). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
3. Comstock, J. R., & Arnegard, R. J. (1992). The multi-attribute task battery for human operator workload and strategic behavior research. (Technical Memorandum No. 104174). Hampton, VA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
4. Endsley, M. R. (1995). Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 65-84.
5. Endsley, M. R., (1999). Situation Awareness in Aviation Systems. In D. J. Garland, J. A. Wise, & V. D. Hopkin (Eds.), Handbook of Aviation Human Factors (pp. 257-275). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Hancock, P. A. (1996). Effects of control order, augmented feedback, input device and practice on tracking performance and perceived workload. Ergonomics, 39(9), 1146-1162.
7. Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock (Ed.), Human mental workload. Advances in psychology, p. 139-183. Oxford, England: North-Holland.
8. Meshkati, N., Hancock, P. A., & Rahimi, M. (1990). Techniques in mental workload assessment. In J. R. Wilson, & N. Corlett, (Eds.), Evaluation of human work (pp. 605-627). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
9. Sorkin, R. D., Kantowitz, B. H., & Kantowitz, S. C. (1988). Likelihood alarm displays. Human Factors, 30(4), 445-459.
10. Swets, J. A. (1992). The science of choosing the right decision threshold in high-stakes diagnostics. American Psychologist, 47, 522-532.
11. Taylor, R.M. (1989). Situational awareness rating technique (SART): The development of a tool for aircrew systems design. In Proceeding of the AGARD AMP Symposium on Situational Awareness in Aerospace Operations, CP478. Seuilly-sur Seine: NATO AGARD.
12. Uhlarik, J., Comerford, D. A. (2002). A review of situation awareness liturature relevant to pilot surveillance functions. (Technical Report No.98F80691). Washington, DC: Office of Aerospace Medicine Federal Aviation Administration.