New ends, new means, but old attitudes: Citizens' views on open government and government 2.0

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Nam, Taewoo ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BROADBAND ADOPTION; E-GOVERNMENT; E-GOVERNMENT SERVICES; POSITIVE ATTITUDE; RESEARCH CENTER;

SYSTEMS SCIENCE;

GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING;

EID: 79952954059     PISSN: 15301605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2011.316     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. Akman, İ., Yazici, A., Mishra, A., & Arifoglu, A. (2005). E-Government: A global view and an empirical evaluation of some attributes of citizens. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 239-257. (Pubitemid 40869738)
2. Anttiroiko, A.-V. (2010). Innovation in democratic e-governance: Benefitting from Web 2.0 applications in the public sector. In C. G. Reddick (Ed.), Citizens and E-Government: Evaluating Policy and Management (pp. 110-130). Hershey, PA: IGI Publishing.
3. Bélanger, F., & Carter, L. (2006a). The effects of the digital divide on e-government: An empirical evaluation. Paper presented at the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-39), Kauai, Hawaii.
4. Bélanger, F., & Carter, L. (2006b). The impact of the digital divide on e-government use. Communications of the ACM, 52(4), 132-135.
5. Becker, J., Niehaves, B., Bergener, P., & Räckers, M. (2008). Digital divide in eGovernment: The eInclusion gap model. In M. A. Wimmer, H. J. Scholl & E. Ferro (Eds.), Electronic Government: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference, EGOV 2008 (Turin, Italy, Aug 31 - Sep 5, 2008) (Vol. 5184, pp. 231-242). Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
6. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264-271.
7. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., Shuler, J. A., Simmons, S. N., & Grimes, J. M. (2009). Reconciling government documents and e-government: Government information in policy, librarianship, and education. Government Information Quarterly, 26(3), 433-436.
8. Birkinshaw, P. (1997). Freedom of information. Parliamentary Affairs, 50(1), 164-181.
9. Carter, L., & Belanger, F. (2005). The influence of perceived characteristics of innovating on e-government adoption. The Electronic Journal of e-Government, 2(1), 11-20.
10. Cho, H. J., & Hwang, S. (2010). Government 2.0 in Korea: Focusing on e-participation services. In C. G. Reddick (Ed.), Politics, Democracy and E-Government: Participation and Service Delivery (pp. 94-114). Hershey, PA: IGI Publishing.
11. DiMaio, A. (2009). Government 2.0: A Gartner definition. from http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea-dimaio/2009/11/13/government-2-0-a-gartner- definition/
12. Eggers, W. D. (2005). Government 2.0: Using Technology to Improve Education, Cut Red Tape, Reduce Gridlock, and Enhance Democracy. Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
13. Goldfinch, S. (2007). Pessimism, computer failure, and information systems development in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 917-929.
14. Goldfinch, S., Gauld, R., & Herbison, P. (2009). The participation divide? Political participation, trust in government, and e-government in Australia and New Zealand. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 68(3), 333-350.
15. Golembiewski, R. T., & Gabris, G. (1995). Tomorrow's city management: Guides for avoiding success-becomingfailure. Public Administration Review, 55(3), 240-246.
16. Holzer, M., & Halachmi, A. (1996). Measurement as a means of accountability. International Journal of Public Administration, 19(11/12), 1921-1944.
17. Kolsaker, A., & Lee-Kelley, L. (2008). Citizens' attitudes towards e-government and e-governance: A UK study. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(7), 723-738.
18. Lathrop, D., & Ruma, L. (Eds.). (2010). Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media.
19. Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional e-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 12-36.
20. Millard, J. (2009). Government 1.5: Is the bottle half full or half empty? European Journal of ePractice, 9(1), 35-50, Available at http://www.epractice.eu/files/European %20Journal%20epractice%20Volume%209-201. pdf.
21. Mintz, D. (2008). Government 2.0: Fact or fiction? Public Manager, 36(4), 21-24.
22. Molinari, E. F. F. (2009). Framing Web 2.0 in the process of public sector innovation: Going down the participation ladder. European Journal of ePractice, 9(1), 20-34, Available at http://www.epractice.eu/files/European%20 Journal%20epractice%20Volume%209-201.pdf.
23. Moon, M. J. (2002). The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424-433.
24. Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & Stansbury, M. (2003). Virtual Inequality: Beyond the Digital Divide. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
25. Niehaves, B., & Becker, J. (2008). The age-divide in egovernment - data, iterpretations, theory fragments. In M. Oya, R. Uda & C. Yasunobu (Eds.), Towards Sustainable Society on Ubiquitous Networks: Proceedings of the 8th IFIP Conference on e-Business, e-Services, and e-Society (I3E 2008, Sep 24-16, 2008, Tokyo, Japan) (Vol. 286, pp. 279-287). Boston: Springer.
26. Nye, J. S., Jr., Zelikow, P. D., & King, D. C. (Eds.). (1997). Why People Don't Trust Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27. Osimo, D. (2009). Editorial: Government 2.0 - hype, hope, or reality? European Journal of ePractice, 9(1), 2-4, Available at http://www.epractice.eu/ files/European%20Journal%20epra ctice%20Volume%209-201.pdf.
28. Parks, W. (1957). The open government principle: Applying the right to know under the constitution The George Washington Law Review, 26(1), 1-22.
29. Parycek, P., & Sachs, M. (2009). Open government: Information flow in Web 2.0. European Journal of ePractice, 9(1), 59-70, Available at http://www.epractice.eu/files/European%20Journal%20epra ctice%20Volume%209-201. pdf.
30. Peters, B. G. (2009). American Public Policy: Promise and Performace (8th ed.). Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
31. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Touchstone.
32. Reddick, C. G. (2004a). Citizen interaction with egovernment: From the streets to servers? Government Information Quarterly, 22(1), 38-57.
33. Reddick, C. G. (2004b). A two-stage model of e-government growth: Theories and empirical evidence for U.S. cities. Government Information Quarterly, 21(1), 51-64.
34. Rose-Ackerman, S. (2008). Corruption and government. International Peacekeeping, 15(3), 328-343.
35. Sipior, J. C., & Ward, B. T. (2005). Bridging the digital divide for e-government inclusion: A United States case study. The Electronic Journal of e-Government, 3(3), 137-146.
36. Sweeney, A. D. P. (2007). Electronic government-citizen relationships exploring citizen perspectives. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 4(2), 101-116.
37. Tapscott, D., Williams, A. D., & Herman, D. (2008). Government 2.0: Transforming Government and Governance for the Twenty-First Century, New Paradigm, Available at http://www.collaborationproject.org/download/attachments/ 3801180/Gov-Transforming.pdf?version=3801181.
38. Tolbert, C., & Mossberger, K. (2003, May 18-21). The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government. Paper presented at the Annual National Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o 2003), Boston, MA.
39. van de Walle, S., van Roosbroek, S., & Bouckaert, G. (2008). Trust in the public sector: is there any evidence for a long-term decline? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 74(1), 47-64.
40. Wangpipatwong, S., Chutimaskul, W., & Papasratorn, B. (2008). Understanding citizen's continuance intention to use e-government website: A composite view of technology acceptance model and computer self-efficacy. The Electronic Journal of e-Government, 6(1), 55-64.
41. Warkentin, M., Gefen, D., Pavlou, P. A., & Rose, G. M. (2002). Encouraging citizen adoption of e-government by building trust Electronic Markets, 12(3), 157-162.
42. Welch, E. W., Hinnant, C. C., & Moon, M. J. (2005). Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(3), 371-391. (Pubitemid 41350834)
43. West, D. M. (2004). E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 15-27.
44. Yong, J. S., & Koon, L. H. (2005). E-government: Enabling public sector reform. In J. S. Yong (Ed.), E-government in Asia: Enabling Public Service Innovation in the 21st Century (pp. 3-21). Singapore: Times Media.