A very popular blog: The internet and the possibilities of publicity

New Media and Society

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 187-202

  Malin, Brenton J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

attention; broadcasting; internet; public sphere; publicity

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952948992     PISSN: 14614448     EISSN: 14617315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1461444810369889     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Anderson C. (2006) The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of More. New York: Hyperion.
2. Barker DC, Lawrence AB (2006) Media favoritism and presidential nominations: Reviving the direct effects model. Political Communication 23(1): 41-59.
3. Bennett SE (2002) Americans' exposure to political talk radio and their knowledge of public affairs. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 46(1): 74-86.
4. Berman M. (2009a) Programming insider: CBS and Fox continue to dominate in Prime. MediaWeek.com, 7 May.
5. Berman M. (2009b) Programming insider: Remembering Dom DeLuise. MediaWeek.com, 6 May.
6. Bernays EL (1935) Molding public opinion. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 179: 82-7.
7. Bielby WT, Bielby DD (2003) Controlling prime-time: Organizational concentration and network programming strategies. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 47(4): 573-96.
8. Bolter JD, Grusin RA (1999) Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. boyd d (2008) Why youth {black heart suit} social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In: Buckingham D (ed.) Youth, Identity, and Digital Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 119-42.
10. Calhoun CJ, ed. (1992) Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Cho J., Roy S. (2004) Impact of search engines on page popularity. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on World Wide Web. New York: Association for Computer Machinery, 20-9.
12. Cho J., Roy S., and Adams RE (2005) Page quality: In search of an unbiased web ranking. In: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
13. Dayan D., Katz E. (1992) Media Events: The Live Broadcasting of History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Dewey J. (1927) The Public and its Problems. New York: H. Holt.
15. Diaz A. (2008) Through the Google goggles: Sociopolitical bias in search engine design. In: Spink A, Zimmer M (eds) Web Search: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Berlin: Springer, 11-34.
16. Donohue JM, Cevasco M., and Rosenthal MB (2007) A decade of direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs. New England Journal of Medicine 357(7): 673-81.
17. Downey J., Fenton N. (2003) New media, counter publicity and the public sphere. New Media & Society 5(2): 185-202.
18. Dunbar R. (2007) Evolution and the social sciences. History of the Human Sciences 20(2): 29-50.
19. FCC v. Pacifica Foundation (1978) 438 US 726.
20. Feldman L., Young DG (2008) Late-night comedy as a gateway to traditional news: An analysis of time trends in news attention among late-night comedy viewers during the 2004 presidential primaries. Political Communication 25(4): 401-22.
21. Frieze A., Vera J., and Chakrabarti S. (2006) The influence of search engines on preferential attachment. Internet Mathematics 3(3): 361-81.
22. Habermas J. (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Hall A., Cappella JN (2002) The impact of political talk radio exposure on attributions about the outcome of the 1996 US presidential election. Journal of Communication 52(2): 332-50.
24. Hoffman LH, Thomson TL (2009) The effect of television viewing on adolescents' civic participation: Political efficacy as a mediating mechanism. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 53(1): 3-21.
25. Holbert RL (2004) Political talk radio, perceived fairness, and the establishment of President George W. Bush's political legitimacy. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 9(3): 12-27.
26. Holbert RL, Lambe JL, Dudo AD, and Carlton KA (2007) Primacy effects of The Daily Show and national TV news viewing: Young viewers, political gratifications, and internal political self-efficacy. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 51(1): 20-38.
27. Horton D., Wohl R. (1956) Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry 19: 215-29.
28. Jenkins H. (2006) Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.
29. Kaid LL, Postelnicu M. (2005) Political advertising in the 2004 election: Comparison of traditional television and internet message. American Behavioral Scientist 49: 265-78.
30. Keeping the Internet Neutral? Tim Wu and Christopher Yoo Debate (2007) Federal Communications Law Journal 59(3): 575-92.
31. Krugman DM, Quinn WH, Sung Y., and Morrison M. (2005) Understanding the role of cigarette promotion and youth smoking in a changing marketing environment. Journal of Health Communication 10(3): 261-78.
32. Lanham RA (2006) The Economics of Attention: Style and Substance in the Age of Information. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
33. Lewis J., West A. (2009) 'Friending': London-based undergraduates' experience of Facebook. New Media & Society 11(7): 1209-29.
34. Lewis K., Kaufman J., Gonzalez M., Wimmer A., and Christakis N. (2008) Taste, ties, and time: A new social network dataset using Facebook.com. Social Networks 30: 330-42.
35. Lippmann W. (1922) Public Opinion. New York: Harcourt Brace.
36. Lippmann W. (1925) The Phantom Public. New York: Harcourt Brace.
37. Lu Y., Roberts S., Lió P., Dunbar R., and Crowcroft J. (2009) Size matters: Variation in personal network size, personality and effect on information transmission. International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering 4: 188-93.
38. McChesney RW (1993) Telecommunications, Mass Media, and Democracy: The Battle for the Control of US Broadcasting, 1928-1935. New York: Oxford University Press.
39. McChesney RW (1999) Rich Media, Poor Democracy: Communication Politics in Dubious Times. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
40. McChesney RW (2004) The Problem of the Media: US Communication Politics in the Twenty-first Century. New York: Monthly Review Press.
41. Macleod C. (2006) Global adspend prospects. International Journal of Advertising 25(2): 261-3.
42. Malin B. (2003) Drive by programming: Niche marketing to the channel surfer on TNT, MTV, and CNN. Explorations in Media Ecology 2(2): 101-15.
43. Malin B. (2010) Viral manhood: Niche marketing, hard-boiled detectives, and the economics of masculinity. Media, Culture & Society 32(3).
44. Merton RK, Fiske M., and Curtis A. (1946) Mass Persuasion: The Social Psychology of a War Bond Drive. New York: Harper.
45. Nail J. (2007) Visibility versus surprise: Which drives the greatest discussion of Superbowl advertisements? Journal of Advertising Research 47(4): 412-19.
46. Negt O., Kluge A. (1993) Public Sphere and Experience: Toward an Analysis of the Bourgeois and Proletarian Public Sphere. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
47. Newman JL (2008) Keeping the internet neutral: Net neutrality and its role in protecting political expression on the internet. Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal 31(1): 153-72.
48. Owens L., Palmer LK (2003) Making the news: Anarchist counter-public relations on the world wide web. Critical Studies in Media Communication 20(4): 335-61.
49. Pan B., Hembrooke H., Joachims T., Lorigo L., Gay G., and Granka L. (2007) In Google we trust: Users' decisions on rank, position, and relevance. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication 12(3): 801-23.
50. Pandey S., Roy S., Olston C., Cho J., and Chakrabarti S. (2005) Shuffling a stacked deck: The case for partially randomized ranking of search engine results, paper presented at the 31st International Conference on Very Large Data Bases.
51. Paterson C. (2005) News agency dominance in international news on the internet. In: Skinner D, Compton J, Gasher M (eds) Converging Media, Diverging Politics: A Political Economy of the News Media in the United States and Canada. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 145-64.
52. Peters JD (1995) Historical tensions in the concept of public opinion. In: Glasser TL, Salmon (eds) Public Opinion and the Communication of Consent. New York: Guilford, 1-32.
53. Poster M. (2001) Information Subject. New York: Routledge.
54. Red Lion Broadcasting Co. Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission (1969) 395 US 367.
55. Roberts SGB, Dunbar RIM, Pollet TV, and Kuppens T. (2009) Exploring variation in active network size: Constraints and ego characteristics. Social Networks 31(2): 138-46.
56. Simpson JA, Weiner ESC, and Press OU (1989) The Oxford English Dictionary (2nd edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57. Snyder LB, Milici FF, Slater M., Sun H., and Strizhakova Y. (2006) Effects of alcohol advertising exposure on drinking among youth. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine 160(1): 18-24.
58. Staiger J. (2000) Blockbuster TV: Must-see Sitcoms in the Network Era. New York: New York University Press.
59. Sweetser KD, Golan GJ, and Wanta W. (2008) Intermedia agenda setting in television, advertising, and blogs during the 2004 election. Mass Communication and Society 11(2): 197-216.
60. Warner M. (2002) Publics and Counterpublics. Public Culture 14: 49-90.
61. Weaver D., Drew D. (2001) Voter learning and interest in the 2000 presidential election: Did the media matter? Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 78(4): 787-98.
62. Weinstein D. (2004) The Forgotten Network: DuMont and the Birth of American Television. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
63. Yanovitzky I., Cappella JN (2001) Effect of call-in political talk radio shows on their audiences: Evidence from a multi-wave panel analysis. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 13(4): 377-97.