Pair analytics: Capturing reasoning processes in collaborative visual analytics

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Arias Hernandez, Richard ^a   Kaastra, Linda T ^b   Green, Tera M ^a   Fisher, Brian ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC TOOLS; COGNITIVE PROCESS; COGNITIVE TASK ANALYSIS; COGNITIVE WORKLOADS; COLLABORATIVE ANALYSIS; FIELD STUDIES; PILOT STUDIES; PROTOCOL ANALYSIS; REASONING PROCESS; VISUAL ANALYTICS; VISUAL REPRESENTATIONS;

JOB ANALYSIS; SYSTEMS SCIENCE;

VISUALIZATION;

EID: 79952928168     PISSN: 15301605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2011.339     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. Bangerter, A. and H.H. Clark, "Navigating joint projects with dialogue," Cognitive Science, vol. 27, no 2, 2003, pp. 195-225.
2. Bryant, S., P. Romero and B. Boulay, "Pair programming and the mysterious role of the navigator," International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 66, no. 7, July 2008, pp. 519-529.
3. Chang, R., C. Ziemkiewicz, T. M. Green, and W. Ribarsky, "Defining insight for visual analytics," IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol. 29, no. 2, 2009, pp. 14-17.
4. Chong, J. and T. Hurlbutt, "The Social Dynamics of Pair Programming," IEEE 29th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'07), Minneapolis, MN, May 20-26, 2007.
5. Clark, H.H., "Pointing and Placing," In: S.Kita (ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 2003, pp.243-268.
6. Clark, H.H., Using Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996.
7. Dunbar, K., "How scientists think: online creativity and conceptual change in science." In: T.B. Ward, S.M. Smith and S. Vaid (eds). Conceptual Structures and Processes: Emergence, Discovery and Change. Washington, DC: APA Press. 1996.
8. Ericsson, K.A. and H.A. Simon, Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993.
9. Gallis, H., E. Arisholm and T. Dyba, "An initial framework for research on pair programming," In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, 2003.
10. Gonzales, V. and A. Kobsa, "A Workplace Study of the Adoption of Information Visualization Systems," Proc. I-KNOW: Third International Conf. Knowledge Management, 2003, pp. 92-102.
11. Gorman, M.E., "Introduction to Cognition in Science and Technology," Topics in Cognitive Science, vol. 1, no. 4, Oct. 2009, pp. 675-685.
12. Green, T.M., D.H. Jeong and B. Fisher, "Using personality factors to predict interface learning performance," In: Proceedings of Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 43, Jan. 5-8, Koloa, Hawaii, 2010.
13. Green, T.M., W. Ribarsky, and B. Fisher, "Building and applying a human cognition model for visual analytics," Information Visualization, vol. 8, no. 1, 2009, pp. 1-13.
14. Heer, J. and M. Agrawala, "Design considerations for collaborative visual analytics," Information Visualization, vol. 7, no. 1, 2008, pp. 49-62.
15. Hutchins, E., Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.
16. Irani P., and C. Ware, "Diagramming Information Structures Using 3D Perceptual Primitives," ACM Trans. Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1-19, 2003.
17. Jeong, D.H., W. Dou, F. Stukes, W. Ribarsky, H.R. Lipford and R. Chan, "Evaluating the Relationship Between User Interaction and Financial Visual Analysis," IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology, Atlantic City, Columbus,OH, October 19-24, 2008, pp. 83-90.
18. Johnston, R., Analytic Culture in the US Intelligence Community: An Ethnographic Study, Center for the Study of Intelligence, Central Intelligence Agency, 2005.
19. Kang, Y., C. Gorg and J. Stasko, "Evaluating Visual Analytics Systems for Investigative Analysis: Deriving Design Principles from a Case Study," IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology, Atlantic City, NJ, Oct. 12-13, 2009, pp. 139-146.
20. Latour, B. and S. Woolgar, Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, 1979.
21. Militello, L.G. and R.J.B. Hutton, "Applied cognitive task analysis (ACTA): a practitioner's toolkit for understanding cognitive task demands," Ergonomics, vol. 41, no. 11, 1998, pp.1618-1641.
22. Nardi, B., Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-computer Interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 1996
23. Pirolli, P. and S.K. Card, "Information Foraging," Psychological Review, vol. 106, no. 4, 1999, pp. 643-675.
24. Pirolli, P. and S.K. Card, "The Sensemaking Process and Leverage Points for Analyst Technology as Identified Through Cognitive Task Analysis," In: Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligence Analysis, McLean, VA: Mitre, May 2005.
25. Ribarsky, W., B. Fisher and W.M. Pottenger, "Science of Analytical Reasoning," Information Visualization, vol. 8, no. 4, 2009, pp. 254-262.
26. Rieman, J., "A Field Study of Exploratory Learning Strategies," ACM Trans. Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 3, pp. 189-218, 1996.
27. Robertson, G., D. Ebert, S. Eick, D, Keim and K. Joy, "Scale and Complexity in Visual Analytics," Information Visualization, vol. 8, no. 4, 2009, pp. 247-253
28. Saraiya, P., C. North and K. Duca, "An insight-based methodology for evaluating bioinformatics visualizations," IEEE Transactions on Visualizations and Computer Graphics, vol. 11, no. 4, Jul-Aug 2005, pp. 443-456.
29. Saraiya, P., C. North, V. Lam, and K. Duca, "An insight-based longitudinal study of visual analytics," IEEE Transactions on Visualizations and Computer Graphics, vol. 12, no. 6, Nov-Dec 2006, pp. 1511-1522.
30. Scholtz, J., "Beyond Usability: Evaluation Aspects of Visual Analytic Environments," IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology, Baltimore, MD, Oct. 31-Nov. 2, 2006, pp. 145-150.
31. Schooler, J.W., S. Ohlsson, and K. Brooks, "Thoughts beyond words: When language overshadows insight," Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol. 122, no. 2, June 1993, pp. 166-183.
32. Suchman, L., Plans and Situated Action: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1987.
33. Trafton, J.G., S.S. Kirschenbaum, T.L. Tsui, R.T. Miyamoto, J.A. Ballas, and P.D. Raymond, "Turning Pictures into Numbers: Extracting and Generating Information from Complex Visualizations," International Journal of Human Computer Studies, vol. 53, no. 5, 2000, pp. 827-850.
34. Trickett, S.B. and J.G. Trafton, "'What if ...': The Use of Conceptual Simulations in Scientific Reasoning," Cognitive Science, vol. 31, no. 5, Sep-Oct 2005, pp. 843-875
35. Trickett, S.B., J.G. Trafton, L.D. Saner and C.D. Schunn, ""I don't know what's going on there": The Use of Spatial Transformations to Deal With and Resolve Uncertainty in Complex Visualizations," In: M.C. Lovett and P. Shah (eds.), Thinking with Data, New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2007, pp. 65-86
36. Trickett, S.B., W.T. Fu, C.D. Schunn and J.G. Trafton, "From dipsy-doodles to streaming motions: Changes in representation in the analysis of visual scientific data." In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2000.
37. Wright, W., D. Schroh, P. Proulx, A. Skaburskis, and B. Cort. "The sandbox for analysis: Concepts and methods," In ACM CHI, April 2006, pp. 801-810.