Introduction to cognition in science and technology

Topics in Cognitive Science

Volumn 1, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 675-685

  Gorman, Michael E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Computational simulations; Distributed cognition; Engineering; Science; Shared cognition; Technology

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COOPERATION; HUMAN; PROBLEM SOLVING; PROCEDURES; RESEARCH; SCIENCE; TECHNOLOGY;

COGNITION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; PROBLEM SOLVING; RESEARCH; SCIENCE; TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 79952957953     PISSN: 17568757     EISSN: 17568765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01034.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bruce, R. V. (1973). Bell: Alexander Graham Bell and the conquest of solitude. Boston: Little, Brown.
2. Chi, M. T. H. (2006). Laboratory methods for assessing experts' and novices' knowledge. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 167-184). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
3. Collins, H., Evans, R., & Gorman, M. (2007). Trading zones and interactional expertise. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 39(1), 657-666.
4. Dunbar, K. N., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2005). Causal thinking in science: How science and students interpret the~unexpected. In M. E. Gorman, R. D. Tweney, D. C. Gooding, & A. Kincannon (Eds.), Scientific and technological thinking (pp. 57-80). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Galison, P. (1999). Reflections on image and logic: A material culture of microphysics. Perspectives on Science, 7(2), 255-284.
6. Giere, R. N. (1992). Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science; cognitive models of science. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
7. Gooding, D. (1990). Experiment and the making of meaning: Human agency in scientific observation and experiment. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
8. Gorman, M. E. (1989). Error, falsification and scientific inference: An experimental investigation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 385-412.
9. Gorman, M. E. (1992). Simulating science: Heuristics, mental models and technoscientific thinking. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
10. Gorman, M. E. (1995). Confirmation, disconfirmation and invention: The case of Alexander Graham Bell and the telephone. Thinking and Reasoning, 1(1), 31-53.
11. Gorman, M. E. (2006). Scientific and technological thinking. Review of General Psychology, 10(2), 113-129.
12. Gorman, M. E., & Carlson, W. B. (1990). Interpreting invention as a cognitive process: The case of Alexander Graham Bell, Thomas Edison and the telephone. Science, Technology and Human Values, 15, 131-164.
13. Gorman, M. E., Mehalik, M. M., Carlson, W. B., & Oblon, M. (1993). Alexander Graham Bell, Elisha Gray and the speaking telegraph: A cognitive comparison. History of Technology, 15, 1-56.
14. Gorman, M. E., Tweney, R. D., Gooding, D. C., Kincannon, A., Tweney, R. D. & Gooding, D. C. (2005). Scientific and technological thinking. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Klahr, D. (2000). Exploring science: The cognition and development of discovery processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Kuhn, D. (1989). Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review, 96(4), 674-689.
18. Kulkarni, D., & Simon, H. A. (1988). The processes of scientific discovery: The strategies of experimentation. Cognitive Science, 12, 139-175.
19. Langley, P., Simon, H. A., Bradshaw, G. L., & Zykow, J. M. (1987). Scientific discovery: Computational explorations of the creative processes. Cambridge: MIT Press.
20. Mahoney, M. J. (1976). Scientists as subject: The psychological imperative. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
21. Mynatt, C. R., Doherty, M. E., & Tweney, R. D. (1978). Consequences of confirmation and disconfirmation in a simulated research environment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 395-406.
22. Piaget, J., & Garcia, R. (1989). Psychogenesis and the history of science. New York: Columbia University Press.
23. Shrager, J., & Klahr, D. (1986). Instructionless learning about a complex device: The paradigm and observations. International Journal Man-Machine Studies, 29, 153-189.
24. Shrager, J., & Langley, P. (1990). Computational models of scientific discovery and theory formation. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc.
25. Thagard, P. (1988). Computational philosophy of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Thagard, P. (1989). Explanatory coherence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 435-467.
27. Tweney, R. D., Doherty, M. E., & Mynatt, C. R. (1981). On scientific thinking. New York: Columbia University Press.
28. Tweny, R. D. (1989). A framework for the cognitive psychology of science. In B. Gholson, W. R. Shaddish, R. A. Neimeyer & A. C. Houts (Eds.) Psychology of Science (pp. 342-366). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
29. Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24(4), 535-585.
30. Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 129-140.