Diagramming Information Structures Using 3D Perceptual Primitives

ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 1-19

  Irani, Pourang ^a   Ware, Colin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

Author keywords

3D diagrams; Design; Human Factors; information visualization

Indexed keywords

EID: 85013764790     PISSN: 10730516     EISSN: 15577325     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/606658.606659     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Barfield, W. and Robless, R. 1989. The effects of two- and three-dimensional graphics on the problem-solving performance of experienced and novice decision-makers. Behav. Inf. Technol. 8, 369-385
2. Bertin, J. 1981. Graphics and Graphic Information Processing. de Gruyter, Berlin
3. Biederman, I. 1987. Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychol. Rev. 94, 2, 115-147
4. Biederman, I. and Gerhardstein, P. C. 1993. Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. J. Exper. Psychol. Hum. Perception Perform. 19, 1162-1182
5. Biederman, I. and Gehardstein, P. C. 1995. Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: Reply to Tarr and Bulthoff (1995). J. Exper. Psychol. 21, 6, 1506-1514
6. Bower, G. H., Carlin, M. B., Andduek, A. 1995. Comprehension and memory for pictures. Memory Cogn. 3, 2, 216-220
7. Carswell, C. M., Frankenberger, S., and Bernhard, D. 1991. Graphing in depth: Perspectives on the use of three-dimensional graphs to represent lower-dimensional data. Behav. Inf. Technol. 10, 6, 474-569
8. Edelman, S. 1995. Representation of similarity in 3D object discrimination. Neural Comput. 7, 407-422
9. Enns, J. T. and Rensink, R. A. 1990. Sensitivity to three-dimensional orientation in visual search. Psychol. Sci. 1, 5, 323-326
10. Fowler, M. 1996. UML Distilled: Applying the Standard Object Modeling Language. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass
11. Hahn, J. and Kim, J. 1999. Why are some diagrams easier to work with? Effects of diagrammatic representation on the cognitive integration process of systems analysis and design. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 6, 3, 181-213
12. Halverston, J. 1992. The first pictures, perceptual foundations of Paleolithic art. Perception 21, 389-404
13. Harel, D. 1995. On visual formalisms. In Diagrammatic Reasoning: Cognitive and Computational Perspectives, J. Glasgow, N. H. Narayanan, and B. Chandrasekaran, Eds. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 235-272
14. Irani, P. and Ware, C. 2000. Diagrams based on structured object perception. In Proceedings of Advanced Visual Interfaces AVI'2000 (Palermo, Italy, May), 61-67
15. Hummel and Biederman, I. 1992. Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychol. Rev. 99, 480-517
16. Koffka, K. 1935. Principles of Gestalt Psychology. Harcourt, New York
17. Kosslyn, S. M. 1994. Elements of Graph Design. W. H. Freeman, New York
18. Larkin, J. H. and Simon, H. A. 1987. Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cogn. Sci. 11, 65-99
19. Lee, J. M. and Maclachian, J. 1986. The effects of 3D imagery on managerial data interpretation. MIS Quart. (Sept.), 257-269
20. Marr, D. 1982. Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. Freeman, San Francisco
21. Marr, D. and Nishihara, H. K. 1978. Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, B 200, 269-294
22. Pressman, R. S. 1992. Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach. McGraw-Hill, New York
23. Ramachandran, V. S. 1988. Perception of shape from shading. Nature 331, 163-166
24. Scaife, M. and Rogers, Y. 1996. External cognition: How do graphical representations work? Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 45, 185-213
25. Triesman, A. 1980. Preattentive processing in vision. Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process. 31, 156-177
26. Ullman, S. 1989. Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition. Cognition 32, 193-254
27. Ware, C. and Franck 1996. Evaluating stereo and motion cues for visualizing information nets in three dimensions. ACM Trans. Graph. 15, 2, 121-140
28. Ware, C. 2000. Information Visualization: Perception for Design. Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo, Calif
29. Watson, C. J. and Driver. R. W. 1983. The influence of computer graphics on the recall of information. MIS Quart. (March), 45-53
30. Zhang, J. 1997. The nature of external representation in problem solving. Cogn. Sci. 21, 2, 179-217