Evaluating visual analytics systems for investigative analysis: Deriving design principles from a case study

VAST 09 - IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 139-146

  Kang, Youn Ah ^a   Görg, Carsten ^a   Stasko, John ^a  

^a Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS TOOLS; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; DESIGN IMPLICATIONS; DESIGN PRINCIPLES; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; INTELLIGENCE ANALYSIS; METHODS OF ANALYSIS; NEW SYSTEM; POTENTIAL BENEFITS; SENSEMAKING; VISUAL ANALYTICS;

GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES;

VISUALIZATION;

EID: 72849135069     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/VAST.2009.5333878     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. E. Bier, S. Card, and J. Bodnar. Entity-based collaboration tools for intelligence analysis. In IEEE VAST, pages 99-106, Oct. 2008.
2. R. Chang, C. Ziemkiewicz, T. M. Green, and W. Ribarsky. Defining insight for visual analytics. IEEE CGA., 29(2):14-17, 2009.
3. G. Chin, O. A. Kuchar, and K. E. Wolf. Exploring the analytical processes of intelligence analysts. In ACM CHI, pages 11-20, April 2009.
4. i2 - Analyst's Notebook. http://www.i2inc.com/.
5. D. H. Jeong, W. Dou, H. Lipford, F. Stukes, R. Chang, and W. Ribarsky. Evaluating the relationship between user interaction and financial visual analysis. In IEEE VAST, pages 83-90, Oct. 2008.
6. A. Perer and B. Shneiderman. Integrating statistics and visualization: case studies of gaining clarity during exploratory data analysis. In ACM CHI, pages 265-274, April 2008.
7. P. Pirolli and S. Card. The sensemaking process and leverage points for analyst technology as identified through cognitive task analysis. In International Conference on Intelligence Analysis, May 2005.
8. C. Plaisant. The challenge of information visualization evaluation. In AVI, pages 109-116, May 2004.
9. C. Plaisant, J.-D. Fekete, and G. Grinstein. Promoting insight-based evaluation of visualizations: From contest to benchmark repository. IEEE TVCG, 14(1):120-134, 2008.
10. A. Robinson. Collaborative synthesis of visual analytic results. In IEEE VAST, pages 67-74, Oct. 2008.
11. P. Saraiya, C. North, and K. Duca. An insight-based methodology for evaluating bioinformatics visualizations. IEEE TVCG, 11(4):443-456, 2005.
12. J. Scholtz. Beyond usability: Evaluation aspects of visual analytic environments. IEEE VAST, pages 145-150, Oct. 2006.
13. B. Shneiderman. The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In IEEE Visual Languages, pages 336-343, Sept. 1996.
14. B. Shneiderman and C. Plaisant. Strategies for evaluating information visualization tools: multi-dimensional in-depth long-term case studies. In BELIV, pages 1-7, May 2006.
15. J. Stasko, C. Görg, and Z. Liu. Jigsaw: supporting investigative analysis through interactive visualization. Information Visualization, 7(2):118-132, 2008.
16. J. J. Thomas and K. A. Cook. Illuminating the Path. IEEE Computer Society, 2005.
17. W. Wright, D. Schroh, P. Proulx, A. Skaburskis, and B. Cort. The sandbox for analysis: Concepts and methods. In ACM CHI, pages 801-810, April 2006.