Navimation: Exploring time, space & motion in the design of screen-based interfaces

International Journal of Design

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1-16

  Eikenes, Jon Olav H ^a   Morrison, Andrew ^a  

^a OSLO SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE AND DESIGN   (Norway)

Author keywords

Animation; Communication design; Interface; Movement; Navigation; Social semiotics

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952896643     PISSN: 19913761     EISSN: 1994036X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Aarseth, E. (1997). Cybertext: Perspectives on ergodic literature. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
2. Andersen, P. B., Holmqvist, B., & Jensen, J. (Eds.). (1993). The computer as medium. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3. Baecker, R., & Small, I. (1990). Animation at the interface. In B. Laurel (Ed.), The art of human-computer interface design (pp. 251-267). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4. Bagnara, S., & Crampton Smith, G. (Eds.). (2006). Theories and practice in interaction design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Benyon, D. (2001). The new HCI? Navigation of information space. Knowledge-Based Systems, 14(8), 425-430.
6. Bernstein, M. (1998). Patterns of hypertext. In Proceedings on the 9th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (pp. 21-29). New York: ACM.
7. Binder, T., Löwgren, J., & Malmborg, L. (Eds.). (2009). (Re) searching the digital Bauhaus. London: Springer.
8. Blythe, M., Overbeeke, K., Monk, A., & Wright, P. (Eds.). (2003). Funology: From usability to enjoyment. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
9. Bolter, J., & Grusin, R. (1999). Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
10. Bødker, S., & Andersen, P. B. (2005). Complex mediation. Human-Computer Interaction, 20(4), 353-402.
11. Chang, B., & Ungar, D. (1993). Animation: From cartoons to the user interface. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (pp. 45-55). New York: ACM.
12. Crilly, N., Maier, A., & Clarkson, P. (2008). Representing artefacts as media: Modelling the relationship between designer intent and consumer experience. International Journal of Design, 2(3), 15-27.
13. Eikenes, J. O. (2009, August 31). Social navimation: Engaging interfaces in social media. Paper presented at the 3rd Nordic Design Research Conference, The Oslo School of Architecture and Design, Oslo, Norway. Retrieved May 15, 2009, from http://ocs.sfu.ca/nordes/index.php/nordes/2009/paper/download/246/133
14. Eisenstein, S. (1988). Eisenstein on Disney. (J. Leyda, Ed.). (A. Upchurch, Trans.). London: Methuen.
15. Gallagher, R., & Paldy, A. (2007). Exploring motion graphics. Clifton Park, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning.
16. Gere, C. (2006). Genealogy of the computer screen. Visual Communication, 5(2), 141-152.
17. Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.
18. Jones, M. (2007). Vanishing point: Spatial composition and the virtual camera. Animation, 2(3), 225-243.
19. Jones, R., & Norris, S. (2005). Discourse in action: Introducing mediated discourse analysis. London: Routledge.
20. Jørgensen, A., & Udsen, L. E. (2005). From calculation to culture: A brief history of the computer as interface. In K. Bruhn Jensen (Ed.), Interface://culture: The World Wide Web as a political resource and aesthetic form (pp. 39-64). Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur Press.
21. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.
22. Krippendorff, K. (1989). On the essential contexts of artifacts or on the proposition that "design is making sense (of things)". Design Issues, 5(2), 9-39.
23. Laurel, B. (1991). Computers as theatre. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
24. Lemke, J. (2000a). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(4), 273-290.
25. Lemke, J. (2000b). Opening up closure: Semiotics across scales. In J. Chandler & G. v. d. Vijver (Eds.), Closure: Emergent organizations and their dynamics. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
26. Lemke, J. (2002). Travels in hypermodality. Visual Communication, 1(3), 299-325.
27. Lemke, J. (2005). Multimedia genres and traversals. Folia Linguistica, 39(1-2), 45-56.
28. Liestøl, G. (1999). Essays in rhetorics of hypermedia design. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
29. Liestøl, G. (2003). "Gameplay": From synthesis to analysis (and vice versa). In G. Liestøl, A. Morrison, & T. Rasmussen (Eds.), Digital media revisited: Theoretical and conceptual innovation in digital domains (pp. 389-413). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
30. Löwgren, J. (2007). Pliability as an experiential quality: Exploring the aesthetics of interaction design. Artifact, 1(2), 85-95.
31. Löwgren, J., & Stolterman, E. (2004). Thoughtful interaction design: A design perspective on information technology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
32. Lunenfeld, P. (1999). The digital dialectic: New essays on new media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
33. Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
34. Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
35. Manovich, L. (2007). After effects, or velvet revolution. Artifact, 1(2), 67-75.
36. Mazé, R. (2007). Occupying time: Design, technology, and the form of interaction. Stockholm: Axl Books.
37. Mazé, R., & Redström, J. (2005). Form and the computational object. Digital Creativity, 16(1), 7-18.
38. Moggridge, B. (2007). Designing interactions. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
39. Moran, T. (1981). The command language grammar: A representation for the user interface of interactive computer systems. International Journal of Machine Studies, 15(1), 3-50.
40. Morrison, A. (in press). (Ed.). Inside multimodal composition. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
41. Morrison, A., & Eikenes, J. O. (2008, June 19-20). The times are a-changing in the interface. Paper presented at the International Conference on Multimodality and Learning. Institute of Education, University of London, London.
42. Morrison, A., Stuedahl, D., Mortberg, C., Wagner, I., Bratteteig, T., & Liestøl, G. (in press). Analytical perspectives. In I. Wagner, T. Bratteteig, & D. Stuedahl (Eds.), Exploring digital design. Vienna: Springer.
43. Murray, J. (1997). Hamlet on the holodeck: The future of narrative in cyberspace. New York: The Free Press.
44. Nadin, M. (1988). Interface design: A semiotic paradigm. Semiotica, 69(3/4), 269-302.
45. O'Neill, S. (2008). Interactive media: The semiotics of embodied interaction. London: Springer.
46. Pilling, J. (1997). A reader in animation studies. Sydney: John Libbey.
47. Power, P. (2009). Animated expressions: Expressive style in 3D computer graphic narrative animation. Animation, 4(2), 107-129.
48. Redström, J. (2001). Designing everyday computational things. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden.
49. Rosenfeld, L., & Morville, P. (1998). Information architecture for the World Wide Web. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly.
50. Royce, T. (2006). Intersemiotic complementarity: A framework for multimodal discourse analysis. In T. Royce & W. Bowcher (Eds.), New directions in the analysis of multimodal discourse (pp. 63-109). London: Routledge.
51. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
52. Shneiderman, B. (1983). Direct manipulation: A step beyond programming languages. IEEE Computer, 16(8), 57-69.
53. Shneiderman, B., Bederson, B., & Drucker, S. (2006). Find that photo!: Interface strategies to annotate, browse, and share. Communications of the ACM, 49(4), 69-71.
54. Skjulstad, S. (2007). Communication design and motion graphics on the Web. Journal of Media Practice, 8(3), 359-378.
55. Skjulstad, S. (in press). What are these? Designers' websites as communication design. In A. Morrison (Ed.), Inside multimodal composition. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
56. Skjulstad, S., & Morrison, A. (2005). Movement in the interface. Computers and composition, 22(4), 413-433.
57. Spence, R. (2007). Information visualization: Design for interaction. Harlow: Pearson Prentice Hall.
58. Thomas, B., & Calder, P. (2001). Applying cartoon animation techniques to graphical user interfaces. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 8(3), 198-222.
59. van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. London: Routledge.
60. Verhoeff, N. (2008). Screens of navigation: From taking a ride to making the ride. Journal of Entertainment Media, 12. Retrieved April 20, 2009, from http://blogs.arts.unimelb.edu.au/refractory/2008/03/06/screens-of-navigation-from-taking-a-ride-to-making-the-ride/
61. Vihma, S. (1995). Products as representations: A semiotic and aesthetic study of design products. Helsinki: University of Art and Design Helsinki (UIAH).
62. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
63. Wartofsky, M. (1979). Models: Representation in scientific understanding. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Reidel Publishing.
64. Wood, A. (2007). Digital encounters. London: Routledge.
65. Woolman, M. (2004). Motion design: Moving graphics for television, music video, cinema, and digital interfaces. Mies, Switzerland: RotoVision.
66. Zettl, H. (1990). Sight, sound, motion: Applied media aesthetics (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.