Representing artefacts as media: Modelling the relationship between designer intent and consumer experience

International Journal of Design

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 15-27

  Crilly, Nathan ^a   Maier, Anja ^a   Clarkson, P John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Communication; Consumer response; Design intention; Interaction; Mass media; Product experience

Indexed keywords

EID: 69849123052     PISSN: 19913761     EISSN: 1994036X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Barnard, M. (2005). Graphic design as communication. London: Routledge.
2. Beniger, J. R. (1990). Who are the most important theorists of communication? Communication Research, 17(5), 698-715.
3. Berlo, D. (1960). The process of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
4. Bloomfield, L. (1935). Language. London: George Allen & Unwin.
5. Broadbent, G. (1973). Design in architecture: Architecture and the human sciences. London: John Wiley & Sons.
6. Broadbent, G. (1980). Architectural objects and their design as a subject for semiotic studies. Design Studies, 1(4), 207-216.
7. Carlile, P. R. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442-455.
8. Coates, D. (2003). Watches tell more than time: Product design, Information and the quest for elegance. London: McGraw-Hill.
9. Crilly, N., & Clarkson, P. J. (May, 2006). The influence of consumer research on product aesthetics. Paper presented at the International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
10. Crilly, N., Good, D., Matravers, D., & Clarkson, P. J. (2008). Design as communication: Exploring the validity and utility of relating intention to interpretation. Design Studies, 29(5), 425-457.
11. Crilly, N., Moultrie, J., & Clarkson, P. J. (2004). Seeing things: Consumer response to the visual domain in product design. Design Studies, 25(6), 547-577.
12. Crilly, N., Moultrie, J., & Clarkson, P. J. (in press). Shaping things: Intended consumer response and the other determinants of product form. Design Studies, doi:10.1016/j. destud.2008.08.001.
13. Curran, J. (2004). The OSI network communications model in diagrammatic context. Unpublished masters thesis, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
14. Daley, J. (1982). Design creativity and the understanding of objects. Design Studies, 3(3), 133-137.
15. Dance, F. E. X. (1967). Toward a theory of human communication. In F. E. X. Dance (Ed.), Human communication theory: Original essays (pp. 293-295). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
16. de Souza, C. S. (1993). The semiotic engineering of user interface languages. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 39(5), 753-773.
17. de Souza, C. S. (2005). The semiotic engineering of human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
18. de Souza, C. S., Barbosa, S. D. J., & Prates, R. O. (2001). A semiotic engineering approach to user interface design. Knowledge Based Systems, 14(8), 461-465.
19. Desmet, P. M. A., & Hekkert, P. (2007). Framework of product experience. International Journal of Design, 1(1), 57-66.
20. Deutsch, K. W. (1952). On communication models in the social sciences. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 16(3), 356-380.
21. Draper, S. W. (1994). Design as Communication. Human-Computer Interaction, 9(1), 61-66.
22. Eckert, C., & Boujut, J-F. (2003). The role of objects in design co-operation: Communication through physical or virtual objects. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 12(2), 145-151.
23. Eco, U. (1968). La struttura assente: Introduzione alla ricerca semiologica. Milan, Italy: Bompiani.
24. Forlizzi, J. (2007). The product ecology: Understanding social product use and supporting design culture. International Journal of Design, 2(1), 11-20.
25. Forslund, K., Dagman, A., & Söderberg, R. (May, 2006). Visual sensitivity: Communicating poor quality. Paper presented at the International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
26. Frascara, J. (1988). Graphic design: Fine art or social science? Design Issues, 5(1), 18-29.
27. Frascara, J. (1997). User-centred graphic design: Mass communications and social change. London: Taylor & Francis.
28. Gerbner, G. (1956). Toward a general model of communication. Educational Technology Research and Development, 4(3), 171-199.
29. Giard, J. (1989). Product semantics and communication: Matching the meaning to the signal. In S. Vihma (Ed.), Semantic visions in design: Proceedings from the symposium on design research and semiotics (pp. b1-b7). Helsinki: University of Industrial Arts Helsinki.
30. Gibbs, R. W. (1999). Intentions in the experience of meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31. Goldschmidt, G. (1994). On visual design thinking: The vis kids of architecture. Design Studies, 15(2), 158-174.
32. Gombrich, E. H. (1968). Art and illusion: A study in the psychology of pictorial representation (3rd ed.). London: Phaidon Press.
33. Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 350-377). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Karjalainen, T. -M. (2004). Semantic transformation in design: Communicating strategic brand identity through product design references. Helsinki, Finland: Ilmari.
35. Kawama, T. (1987). A semiotic approach to the design process. In J. Umiker-Sebeok (Ed.), Marketing and semiotics: New directions in the study of signs for sale (pp. 57-70). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
36. Koenig, G. K. (1974). Architettura e comunicazione (Seconda edizione accresciutia da un saggio su Schindler e Neutra). Florence, Italy: Liberia Editrice Fiorentina.
37. Kotro, T., & Pantzar, M. (2002). Product development and changing cultural landscapes -Is our future in "snowboarding"? Design Issues, 18(2), 30-45.
38. Krippendorff, K. (1989). On the essential contexts of artifacts or on the proposition that design is making sense (of things). Design Issues, 5(2), 9-38.
39. Krippendorff, K., & Butter, R. (1984). Product semantics: Exploring the symbolic qualities of form. Innovation: The Journal of the Industrial Designers Society of America, 3(2), 4-9.
40. Kutschinski-Schuster, B. (1989). Product semantics in the context of corporate identity. In S. Vihma (Ed.), Semantic visions in design: Proceedings from the symposium on design research and semiotics (pp. j1-j13). Helsinki: University of Industrial Arts Helsinki.
41. Laurel, B. (Ed.). (2003). Design research: Methods and perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42. Lawson, B. (2004). What designers know. London: The Architectural Press.
43. Luhmann, N. (1984). Soziale systeme. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.
44. Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
45. Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics (Vol. 1). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46. Maletzke, G. (1981). Medienwirkungsforschung. Tübingen, Germany: Max Niemeyer Verlag. Maletzke's Model originally appeared in 1963 in his Psychologie der Massenkommunikation. Hamburg, Germany, Hans Bredow-Institut.
47. Maier, A. M. (2007). A grid-based assessment method of communication in engineering design. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
48. Maier, A. M., Eckert, C. M., & Clarkson, P. J. (2005). A meta-model for communication in engineering design. CoDesign, 1(4), 243-254.
49. Maser, S. (1976). Theorie ohne Praxis ist leer, Praxis ohn Theorie ist blind! Form, 73, 40-42.
50. McLuhan, M. (2001). Understanding media: The extensions of man. London: Routledge Classics.
51. Mengoni, M., & Germani, M. (September, 2006). Definizione di un linguaggio per l'interpretazione del design intent: Studio dei processi creativi in differenti esperienze di industrial design. Paper presented at the Conference of Conceptual Design Methods for Product Innovation, Forlì, Italy.
52. Mengoni, M., Germani, M., & Mandorli, F. (2006). Surface reconstruction method for reverse engineering based on aesthetic knowledge. In Proceedings of the International Symposiums on Tools and Methods of Competitive Engineering (pp. 251-262). Delft, The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology.
53. Mick, D. G., Burroughs, J. E., Hetzel, P., & Brannen, M. Y. (2004). Pursuing the meaning of meaning in the commercial world: An international review of marketing and consumer research founded on semiotics. Semiotica, 152(1/4), 1-74.
54. Minai, A. T. (1984). Architecture as environmental communication. Berlin, Germany: Mouton.
55. Monö, R. (1997). Design for product understanding: The aesthetics of design from a semiotic approach (M. Knight, Trans.). Stockholm, Sweden: Liber.
56. Muller, W. (2001). Order and meaning in design. Utrecht, The Netherlands: LEMMA Publishers.
57. Mullet, K., & Sano, D. (1995). Designing visual interfaces: Communication oriented techniques. Mountain View, CA: Sun Microsystems.
58. Nadin, M. (1988). Interface design: A semiotic paradigm. Semiotica, 69(3/4), 269-302.
59. Newcomb, T. M. (1966). An approach to the study of communication acts. In A. G. Smith (Ed.), Communication and culture: Readings in the codes of human interaction (pp. 66-79). New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston. First published 1953, in Psychological Review, 60(6): 393-404.
60. Norman, D. A. (1988). The design of everyday things. New York: Doubleday. Norman's model previously appeared in 1986 in his 'Cognitive engineering' in D. A. Norman & S. W. Draper (Eds.), User centred system design: New perspectives on human-computer interaction (p. 46). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
61. Nystrand, M. (1982). The structure of textual space. In M. Nystrand (Ed.), What writers know: The language, process, and structure of written discourse (pp. 75-86). New York: Academic Press.
62. Parsons, T. (1963). On the concept of influence, Public Opinion Quarterly, 27(Spring), 37-62.
63. Richardson, A. (1993). The death of the designer. Design Issues, 9(2), 34-43.
64. Salles, J., Baranauskas, M. C. C., & Bigonha, R. S. (2001). Towards a communication model applied to the interface design process. Knowledge Based Systems, 14(8), 455-459.
65. Schifferstein, H. N. J. (2006). The relative importance of sensory modalities in product usage: A study of self-reports. Acta Psychologica, 121(1), 41-64.
66. Schifferstein, H. N. J., & Hekkert, P. (Eds.). (2008). Product experience. San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
67. Schifferstein, H. N. J., & Cleiren, M. P. H. D. (2005). Capturing product experiences: A split-modality approach. Acta Psychologica, 118(3), 293-318.
68. Schön, D. A., & Wiggins, G. (1992). Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing. Design Studies, 13(2), 135-156.
69. Schramm, W. L. (1961). How communication works. In W. L. Schramm (Ed.), The process and effects of mass communication (pp. 3-26). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
70. Schroeder, J. (2002). Visual consumption. London: Routledge.
71. Scruton, R. (1979). The aesthetics of architecture. London: Methuen.
72. Shannon, C. E. (1993). A mathematical theory of communication. In N. J. A. Sloane & A. D. Wyner (Eds.), Claude Elwood Shannon: Collected papers (Vol. 27, pp. 5-83). New York: IEEE Press. First published 1948, in Bell System Technical Journal, 27 (July and October): 379-423 and 623-656.
73. Shedroff, N. (1999). Information interaction design: A unified field theory of design. In R. E. Jacobson (Ed.), Information design (pp. 267-292). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
74. Suri, J. F. (2005). Thoughtless acts? Observations on intuitive design. San Francisco: Chronicle.
75. Swann, C. (1991). Language and typography. London: Lund Humphries.
76. van Breemen, E. J. J. & Sudijono, S. (1999). The role of shape in communicating designers' aesthetic intents. In Proceedings of the 1999 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences (pp. 403-412). New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
77. Vinck, D., & Jeantet, A. (1995). Mediating and commissioning objects in the sociotechnical process of product design: A conceptual approach. In D. MacLean, P. Saviotti, & D. Vinck (Eds.), Management and new technology: Design networks, and strategy (pp. 111-129). Bruxelles, Belgium: COST Social Sciences Series.
78. Waller, R. (1987). The typographic contribution to language: Towards a model of typographic genres and their underlying structures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
79. Waller, R. (1979). Four aspects of graphic communication. Instructional Science, 8(3), 213-222.
80. Westley, B. H., & MacLean, M. S. (1966). A conceptual model for communications research. In A. G. Smith (Ed.), Communication and culture: Readings in the codes of human interaction (pp. 80-87). New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston. First published 1957, in Journalism Quarterly, 34(4): 31-38.
81. Wollheim, R. (1968). Art and its objects: An introduction to aesthetics. New York: Harper & Row.
82. Zeisel, J. (1984). Inquiry by design: Tools for environment-behaviour research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.