Comparison of refractive error measurements in adults with Z-View aberrometer, Humphrey autorefractor, and subjective refraction

Optometry

Volumn 82, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 231-240

  Cooper, Jeffrey ^a   Citek, Karl ^b   Feldman, Jerome M ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b PACIFIC UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aberrometer; Autorefractor; Axis; Cylinder; Higher order aberrations; Sphere; Subjective refraction; Visual acuity

Indexed keywords

ABERROMETRY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REFRACTION ERROR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL MODEL; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

ABERROMETRY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REFRACTIVE ERRORS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 79952860535     PISSN: 15291839     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.optm.2010.09.013     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Goss D.A., Grosvenor T. Reliability of refraction-a literature review. J Am Optom Assoc 1996, 67:619-630.
2. Elliott M., Simpson T., Richter D., et al. Repeatability and accuracy of automated refraction: a comparison of the Nikon NRK-8000, the Nidek AR-1000, and subjective refraction. Optom Vis Sci 1997, 74:434-438.
3. Joubert L., Harris W.F. Excess of autorefraction over subjective refraction: dependence on age. Optom Vis Sci 1997, 74:439-444.
4. Bullimore M.A., Fusaro R.E., Adams C.W. The repeatability of automated and clinician refraction. Optom Vis Sci 1998, 75:617-622.
5. Liang J., Grimm B., Goelz S., et al. Objective measurement of wave aberrations of the human eye with the use of a Hartmann-Shack wave-front sensor. J Opt Soc Am A 1994, 11:1949-1957.
6. Liang J., Williams D.R. Aberrations and retinal image quality of the normal human eye. J Opt Soc Am A 1997, 14:2873-2883.
7. Salmon T.O., West R.W., Gasser W., et al. Measurement of refractive errors in young myopes using the COAS Shack-Hartmann aberrometer. Optom Vis Sci 2003, 80:6-14.
8. Phillips C.I. Ocular higher-order aberrations in eyes with supernormal vision. Am J Ophthalmol 2005, 140:957.
9. Schallhorn S.C., Tanzer D.J., Kaupp S.E., et al. Comparison of night driving performance after wavefront-guided and conventional LASIK for moderate myopia. Ophthalmology 2009, 116:702-709.
10. Salmon T.O., van de Pol C. Evaluation of a clinical aberrometer for lower-order accuracy and repeatability, higher-order repeatability, and instrument myopia. Optometry 2005, 76:461-472.
11. Cervino A., Hosking S.L., Rai G.K., et al. Wavefront analyzers induce instrument myopia. J Refract Surg 2006, 22:795-803.
12. Nissman S.A., Tractenberg R.E., Saba C.M., et al. Accuracy, repeatability, and clinical application of spherocylindrical automated refraction using time-based wavefront aberrometry measurements. Ophthalmology 2006, 113:570-577.
13. Reinstein D.Z., Archer T.J., Couch D. Accuracy of the WASCA aberrometer refraction compared to manifest refraction in myopia. J Refract Surg 2006, 22:268-274.
14. Martinez A.A., Pandian A., Sankaridurg P., et al. Comparison of aberrometer and autorefractor measures of refractive error in children. Optom Vis Sci 2006, 83:E811-E817.
15. Pesudovs K., Parker K.E., Cheng H., et al. The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction. Optom Vis Sci 2007, 84:387-392.
16. Liu Y., Warden L., Dillon K., et al. Z-View diffractive wavefront sensor-principle and applications. SPIE Proc 2005, 6018:18091-18099.
17. Lai S., Gomez N., Wei J. Method of determining a patient's subjective refraction based on objective measurement. J Refract Surg 2004, 20:S528-S532.
18. Warden L., Liu Y., Binder P.S., et al. Performance of a new binocular wavefront aberrometer based on a self-imaging diffractive sensor. J Refract Surg 2008, 24:188-196.
19. Jethamalani J., Chomyn J., Abdel-Sadek G., et al. Wavefront guided spectacle lenses for emmetropes and myopes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004, 45. Abstract 2764.
20. Kaupp S.E., Brown M.C., van de Pol C., et al. Visual performance in a night driving simulator using spectacles with wavefront guided correction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006, 47. Abstract 1206.
21. Ophthonix User's Guide - Z View Aberrometer 2005, Ophthonix, Vista, CA, 20.
22. Thibos L.N., Wheeler W., Horner D. Power vectors: an application of Fourier analysis to the description and statistical analysis of refractive error. Optom Vis Sci 1997, 74:367-375.
23. Raasch T.W., Schechtman K.B., Davis L.J., et al. Repeatability of subjective refraction in myopic and keratoconic subjects: results of vector analysis. Ophthal Physiol Opt 2001, 21:376-383. for the CLEK Study Group.
24. Altman D.G., Bland J.M. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. The Statistician 1983, 32:307-317.
25. Giessler S., Hammer T., Duncker G.I. Aberrometry due to dilated pupils-which mydriatic should be used?. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2002, 219:655-659. [in German].
26. Kuroda T., Fujikado T., Maeda N., et al. Wavefront analysis in eyes with nuclear or cortical cataract. Am J Ophthalmol 2002, 134(1):1-9.
27. Donnelly W.J., Pesudovs K., Marsack J.D., et al. Quantifying scatter in Shack-Hartmann images to evaluate nuclear cataract. J Refract Surg 2004, 20(5):S515-S522.
28. Maeda N., Fujikado T., Kuroda T., et al. Wavefront aberrations measured with Hartmann-Shack sensor in patients with keratoconus. Ophthalmology 2002, 109(11):1996-2003.
29. Gobbe M., Guillon M. Corneal wavefront aberration measurements to detect keratoconus patients. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2005, 28(2):57-66.
30. Mihashi T., Hirohara Y., Bessho K., et al. Intensity analysis of Hartmann-Shack images in cataractous, keratoconic, and normal eyes to investigate light scattering. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2006, 50(4):323-333.