Method of determining a patient's subjective refraction based on objective measurement

Journal of Refractive Surgery

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2004, Pages

  Lai, Shui ^a   Gomez, Noriko ^a   Wei, Jianping ^a  

^a Ophthonix Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ASTIGMATISM; BINOCULAR VISION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFERENCE PAPER; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MALE; MYOPIA; OPTOMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REFRACTION ERROR; REFRACTOMETRY;

EID: 4644254837     PISSN: 1081597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/1081-597x-20040901-23     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Bullimore MA, Fusaro RE, Adams CW. The repeatability of automated and clinician refraction. Optom Vis Sci 1998;75:617-622.
2. Rosenfield M, Chiu NN. Repeatability of subjective and objective refraction. Optom Vis Sci 1995;72:577-579.
3. Guiaro A, Williams D. A method to predict refractive errors from wavefront aberration data. Optom Vis Sci 2003;80:1-7.
4. Williams DR. Sharpness metric for vision quality. 2004 US Patent Application US 2004/0008323 A1.
5. Thibos LN, Hong X, Bradley A, Applegate RA. Accuracy and precision of objective refraction from wavefront aberrations. J Vis 2004;4:329-351.
6. Liang J, Grimm B, Goelz S, Bille JF. Objective measurement of wave aberrations of the human eye with the use of a Hartmann-Shack wave-front sensor. J Optical Soc Am A 1994;11:1949-1957.
7. Horwitz LS. System and method for wavefront measurement. Dec. 18, 2003. US Patent Application US2003/0231298 A1.
8. Atchison DA, Scott DH. Monochromatic aberrations of human eyes in the horizontal visual field. J Opt Soc Am A 2002;19:2180-2184.
9. Applegate RA, Marsack JD, Ramos R, Sarver EJ. Interaction between aberrations to improve or reduce visual performance. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:1487-1495.