The repeatability of automated and clinician refraction

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 75, Issue 8, 1998, Pages 617-622

  Bullimore, Mark A ^a   Fusaro, Robert E ^b   Adams, Craig W ^c  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Astigmatism; Automated refractor; Fourier; Refraction; Refractive error; Repeatability

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; BIOMEDICAL EQUIPMENT; MEDICAL PROBLEMS; OPTICAL INSTRUMENT LENSES; REFRACTION; SUBJECTIVE TESTING; VISION; VISION AIDS;

ASTIGMATISM; AUTOMATED REFRACTORS; REFRACTIVE ERROR;

OPHTHALMOLOGY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASTIGMATISM; CHILD; DEVICE; DISEASE COURSE; EYE REFRACTION; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MYOPIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION ERROR; REFRACTION INDEX;

EID: 0032146250     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199808000-00028     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Zadnik K, Mutti DO, Friedman NE, Adams AJ. Initial cross-sectional results from the Orinda Longitudinal Study of Myopia. Optom Vis Sci 1993;70:750-8.
2. Adams DW, McBrien NA. Prevalence of myopia and myopic progression in a population of clinical microscopists. Optom Vis Sci 1992;69:467-73.
3. Grosvenor T, Scott R. Three-year changes in refraction and its components in youth-onset and early adult-onset myopia. Optom Vis Sci 1993;70:677-83.
4. Waring GO 3d, Lynn MJ, McDonnell PJ. Results of the prospective evaluation of radial keratotomy (PERK) study 10 years after surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 1994;112:1298-308.
5. Rosenfield M, Chiu NN. Repeatability of subjective and objective refraction. Optom Vis Sci 1995;72:577-9.