Verbal Representation of Fragrances: Dependence on Specific Task

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 658-681

  Manetta, Céline ^a   Sales Wuillemin, Edith ^a   Gaillard, Audrey ^a   Urdapilleta, Isabel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 8   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952822038     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: 15591816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00731.x     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Abdi, H., Valentin, D., Chollet, S., & Chrea, C. (2007). Analyzing assessors and products in sorting tasks: DISTATIS, theory, and applications. Food Quality and Preference, 18, 627-640.
2. Abric, J. C. (1989). L'étude expérimentale des représentations sociales [The experimental study of social representations]. In D. Jodelet (Ed.), Les représentations sociales (pp. 188-203). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
3. Abric, J. C. (1994). Les représentations sociales: Aspects théoriques [The social representations: Theoretical aspects]. In J. C. Abric (Ed.), Pratiques sociales et représentation (pp. 10-36). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
4. Abric, J. C. (2003a). Méthodes d'étude des représentations sociales [Methods for studying social representations]. Ramonville Saint-Agne, France: Erès.
5. Abric, J. C. (2003b). La recherche du noyau central et de la zone muette des représentations sociales [Looking for the central core and the mute zone of social representations]. In J. C. Abric (Ed.), Méthodes d'étude des représentations sociales (pp. 59-80). Ramonville Saint-Agne, France: Erès.
6. Abric, J. C., & Guimelli, C. (1998). Représentations sociales et effets de contexte [Social representations and contextual effects]. Connexions, 72(2), 23-38.
7. Ahn, W. K., Marsh, J. K., Luhmann, C. C., & Lee, K. (2002). Effect of theory-based feature correlations on typicality judgments. Memory and Cognition, 30, 107-118.
8. Barsalou, L. W. (1989). Intraconcept similarity and its implications for interconcept similarity. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 76-121). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9. Berglund, B., Berglund, U., Engen, T., & Ekman, G. (1973). Multidimensional scaling analysis of twenty-one odors. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 14, 131-137.
10. Blancher, G., Chollet, S., Kesteloot, R., Nguyen Hoang, D., Cuvelier, G., & Sieffermann, J.-M. (2006). French and Vietnamese: How do they describe texture characteristics of the same food? A case study with jellies. Food Quality and Preference, 18, 560-575.
11. nd ed.). Paris: Nathan.
12. Chemlal, S., & Cordier, F. (2006). Structures conceptuelles, représentation des objets et des relations entre les objets [Conceptual structures, representation of objects and of relations between objects]. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 7-23.
13. Chrea, C., Valentin, D., Sulmont-Rossé, C., Ly Mai, H., Hoang Nguyen, D., & Abdi, H. (2004). Culture and odor categorization: Agreement between cultures depends upon the odors. Food Quality and Preference, 15, 669-679.
14. Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 240-247.
15. Cowley, J. J., Johnson, A. L., & Brooksbank, B. W. L. (1977). The effect of two odorous compounds on performance in an assessment-of-people test. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2, 159-172.
16. Dravnieks, A. (1982). Odor quality: Semantically generated multidimensional profiles are stable. Science, 218, 799-801.
17. Dubois, D., & Rouby, C. (2002). Names and categories for odors: The veridical label. In C. Rouby, B. Schaal, D. Dubois, R. Gervais, & A. Holley (Eds.), Olfaction, taste and cognition (pp. 47-66). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18. Engen, T. (1987). Remembering odors and their names. American Scientist, 75, 497-503.
19. Faye, P., Brémaud, D., Durand Daubin, M., Courcoux, P., Giboreau, A., & Nicod, H. (2004). Perceptive free sorting tasks with naïve subjects: An alternative to descriptive mappings. Food Quality and Preference, 15, 781-791.
20. Flament, C. (1987). Pratiques et représentations sociales [Practices and social representations]. In J. L. Beauvois, R. Joule, & J. M. Monteil (Eds.), Perspectives cognitives et conduites sociales (Vol. 1, pp. 143-150). Cousset, Switzerland: Delval.
21. Flament, C. (1989). Structure et dynamique des représentations sociales [Structure and process of social representations]. In D. Jodelet (Ed.), Les représentations sociales (pp. 204-219). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
22. Flament, C. (1999). La représentation sociale comme système normatif [The social representation as a normative system]. Psychologie et Société, 1, 29-54.
23. Fraïssé, C., & Stewart, I. (2002). Basic cognitive schemes: An application concerning the social representation of alternative medicine. European Review of Applied Psychology, 52, 281-292.
24. Giboreau, A., Urdapilleta, I., & Richard, J. F. (2003). Effects of context on the description of olfactory properties. In P. Blackbaum (Ed.), Context 2003 LNAI 2680 (pp. 154-163). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
25. Guimelli, C. (1993). Locating the central core of social representations: Towards a method. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 555-559.
26. Guimelli, C. (2003). Le modèle des schèmes cognitifs de base: Méthodes et applications [Basic cognitive schemes: Method and applications]. In J. C. Abric (Ed.), Méthodes d'étude des représentations sociales (pp. 119-143). Ramonville Saint-Agne, France: Erès.
27. Guimelli, C., & Deschamps, J. C. (2000). Effets de contexte sur la production d'associations verbales. Le cas des représentations sociales des gitans [Context effects on verbal association production: Social representations of gypsies]. Cahier Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 47-48, 44-54.
28. Guimelli, C., & Rouquette, M. L. (1992). Contribution du modèle associatif des schèmes cognitifs de base à l'analyse structurale des représentations sociales [Contribution of the associative model of the basic cognitive diagrams to the structural analysis of social representations]. Bulletin de Psychologie, 45, 196-202.
29. Hayes, B. K., & Taplin, J. E. (1995). Similarity-based and knowledge-based processes in category learning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 383-410.
30. Herz, R. S., & Inzlicht, M. (2002). Sex differences in response to physical and social factors involved in human mate selection. The importance of smell for women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 359-364.
31. Ishii, R., Kemp, S. E., Gilbert, A. N., & O'Mahony, M. (1997). Variation in sensory conceptual structure: An investigation involving the sorting of odor stimuli. Journal of Sensory Studies, 12, 195-214.
32. Johnson, K. E., & Mervis, C. B. (1998). Impact of intuitive theories on feature recruitment though the continuum of expertise. Memory and Cognition, 26, 382-401.
33. Jönsson, F. U., Olsson, H., & Olsson, M. J. (2005). Odor emotionality affects the confidence in odor naming. Chemical Senses, 30, 29-35.
34. Karlson, P., & Lüscher, M. (1959). Pheromones: A new term for a class of biologically active substances. Nature, 183, 55-56.
35. Kraut, R. E. (1982). Social presence, facial feedback, and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 853-863.
36. Lawless, H. T. (1999). Descriptive analysis of complex odors: Reality, model, or illusion? Food Quality and Preference, 10, 325-332.
37. Lawless, H. T., & Engen, T. (1977). Associations to odors: Interference, mnemonics, and verbal labeling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 52-59.
38. Lawless, H. T., & Glatter, S. (1990). Consistency of multidimensional scaling models derived from odor sorting. Journal of Sensory Studies, 5, 217-230.
39. Lawless, H. T., Sheng, N., & Knoops, S. S. C. P. (1995). Multidimensional scaling of sorting data applied to cheese perception. Food Quality and Preference, 6, 91-98.
40. Lebart, L., & Salem, A. (1988). Analyse statistique des données textuelles [Statistical analysis of textual data]. Paris: Dunod-Bordas.
41. Leppänen, J. M., & Hietanen, J. K. (2003). Affect and face perception: Odors modulate the recognition advantage of happy faces. Emotion, 3, 315-326.
42. Li, W., Moallem, I., Paller, K. A., & Gottfried, J. A. (2007). Subliminal smells can guide social preferences. Psychological Science, 12, 1044-1049.
43. Lundström, J. N., Gonçalves, M., Esteves, F., & Olsson, M. J. (2003). Psychological effects of subthreshold exposure to the putative human pheromone 4, 16-androstadien-3-one. Hormones and Behavior, 44, 395-401.
44. Lundström, J. N., & Olsson, M. J. (2005). Subthreshold amounts of social odorant affect mood, but not behavior, in heterosexual women when tested by a male, but not a female, experimenter. Biological Psychology, 70, 197-204.
45. Manetta, C., Santarpia, A., Sander, E., Montet, A., & Urdapilleta, I. (2007). Catégorisation du langage descriptif et du langage figuré dans l'expérience des parfums complexes [Categorization of literal and figurative olfactive descriptions in the perception of complex perfumes]. Psychologie Française, 52, 479-497.
46. Manetta, C., Urdapilleta, I., Houix, O., Montet, A., & Richard, J. F. (2007). Variabilité et cohérence dans la description de parfums complexes [Variability and coherence in the description of complex perfumes]. Bulletin de Psychologie, 60, 143-157.
47. Martins, Y., Preti, G., Crabtree, C. R., Runyan, T., Vainius, A. A., & Wysocki, C. J. (2005). Preference for human body odors is influenced by gender and sexual orientation. Psychological Science, 16, 694-701.
48. McBurney, D., Shoup, M., & Streeter, S. (2006). Olfactory comfort: Smelling a partner's clothing during periods of separation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 2325-2335.
49. Medin, D. L., Wattenmaker, W. D., & Hampton, S. E. (1987). Family resemblance, conceptual cohesiveness, and category construction. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 242-279.
50. Moliner, P. (1992). La représentation sociale comme grille de lecture [The social representation as a reading schema]. Aix-en-Provence, France: Presses de l'Université de Provence.
51. Moliner, P. (2001). Une approche chronologique des représentations sociales [A chronological approach of social representations]. In P. Moliner (Ed.), Le dynamique des représentations sociales (pp. 245-268). Grenoble, France: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
52. Moscovici, S. (1989). Des représentations collectives aux représentations sociales: Éléments pour une histoire [From collective representations to social representations: Elements of history]. In D. Jodelet (Ed.), Les représentations sociales (pp. 62-86). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
53. Mouchès, A., & Morille, A. (2002). Odeurs et genres [Odors and gender]. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 53, 73-77.
54. Olsson, M. J., Lundström, J. N., Diamantopoulou, S., & Esteves, F. (2006). A putative female pheromone affects mood in men differently depending on social context. European Review of Applied Psychology, 56, 279-284.
55. Parr, W. V., Green, J. A., White, K. G., & Sherlock, R. R. (2007). The distinctive flavor of New Zealand Sauvignon Blanc: Sensory characterization by wine professionals. Food Quality and Preference, 18, 849-861.
56. Picard, D., Dacremont, C., Valentin, D., & Giboreau, A. (2003). Perceptual dimensions of tactile textures. Acta Psychologica, 114, 165-184.
57. Pierce, J. D., Cohen, A. B., & Ulrich, P. M. (2004). Responsivity to two odorants, androstenone and amyl acetate, and the affective impact of odors on interpersonal relationships. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 118, 14-19.
58. Poitrenaud, S., Richard, J. F., & Tijus, C. (2005). Properties, categories, and categorization. Thinking and Reasoning, 11, 151-208.
59. Potter, J., & Edward, D. (1999). Social representations and discursive psychology: From cognition to action. Culture and Psychology, 5, 447-458.
60. Rateau, P. (1995). Le noyau central des représentations sociales comme système hiérarchisé. Une étude sur la représentation du groupe [The hypothetical hierarchical structure of the central core of social representations: A study of the mental representation of a group]. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 26, 29-52.
61. Richard, J. F. (2004). Les activités mentales: De l'interprétation de l'information à l'action [The mental activities: From interpretation of the information to action]. Paris: Armand Colin.
62. Richard, J. F., & Urdapilleta, I. (2004). Evaluation du fonctionnement cognitif du raisonnement humain et perspectives thérapeutiques [Evaluation of cognitive information processing and human reasoning]. Journal de Thérapie Comportementale et Cognitive, 14(2), 84-88.
63. Roberts, S., Little, A. C., Lyndon, A., Roberts, J., Havlicek, J., & Wright, R. L. (2009). Manipulation of body odour alters men's self-confidence and judgments of their visual attractiveness by women. International Journal of Cosmetic Science, 31, 47-54.
64. Rosch, E. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 328-350.
65. Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 192-233.
66. Rouquette, M. L., & Rateau, P. (1998). Introduction à l'étude des représentations sociales [Introduction to the study of social representations]. Grenoble, France: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
67. Sales-Wuillemin, E. (2005). Psychologie sociale expérimentale: De l'usage du langage [Experimental social psychology: Usage of the language]. Paris: L'Harmattan.
68. Sales-Wuillemin, E., Morlot, R., Masse, L., & Kohler, C. (2009). La représentation sociale de l'hygiène chez les professionnels de santé: Intérêt du recueil par entretien et de l'analyse discursive des opérateurs de liaison issus du modèle des Schèmes Cognitifs de Base (SCB) [Health care workers' social representation of hygiene: Interest of data collection by interviews and discourse analysis focusing on linkage discursive operators]. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 82, 43-72.
69. Sales-Wuillemin, E., Stewart, I., & Dautun, M. (2004). Effets de l'activation d'une représentation sociale par l'attitude: Étude expérimentale [Effects of social representation's activation with attitude: Experimental study]. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 61, 43-56.
70. Sulmont-Rossé, C., Issanchou, S., & Köster, E. P. (2005). Odor naming methodology: Correct identification with multiple-choice versus repeatable identification in a free task. Chemical Senses, 30, 23-27.
71. Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327-352.
72. Urdapilleta, I., Giboreau, A., Manetta, C., Houix, O., & Richard, J. F. (2006). The mental context for the description of odors: A semantic space. European Review of Applied Psychology, 56, 261-271.
73. Urdapilleta, I., Mirabel-Sarron, C., Meunier, J.-M., & Richard, J.-F. (2005). Étude du processes de catégorisation chez des patientes aux troubles des conduites alimentaires: Une nouvelle approche cognitive de la psychopathologie [Study of the categorization process among patients with eating disorders: A new cognitive approach to psychopathology]. L'Encéphale, 31, 82-91.