Study of the categorization process among patients with eating disorders: A new cognitive approach to psychopathology;Étude du processus de catégorisation chez des patientes aux troubles des conduites alimentaires: Une nouvelle approche cognitive de la psychopathologie

Encephale

Volumn 31, Issue 1 I, 2005, Pages 82-91

  Urdapilleta, I ^a   Mirabel Sarron, C ^b   Meunier, J M ^a   Richard, J F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 8   (France)

^b CENTRE HOSPITALIER SAINTE ANNE   (France)

Author keywords

Anorexia; Bulimia; Categorization; Cognition; Property

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANOREXIA NERVOSA; ARTICLE; BINGE EATING DISORDER; BULIMIA; CLINICAL FEATURE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ACTIVITY; DISEASE COURSE; EATING DISORDER; EXPERIENCE; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FOOD COMPOSITION; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEMORY; MENTAL DISEASE; NUTRITION; PERCEPTION; ADOLESCENT; ATTITUDE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANOREXIA NERVOSA; ATTITUDE; BULIMIA; COGNITION; EATING DISORDERS; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS;

EID: 16344362673     PISSN: 00137006     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82376-0     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. BARTHÉLEMY JP, GUÉNOCHE A. Les arbres et les représentations des proximités. Paris: Masson, 1988.
2. BEN-TOVIM DF, WALKER MK, FOK D et al. An adaptative of the Stroop test for measuring shape and food concerns in eating disorders: a quantitative measure of psychopathology? Intern J Eat Disord 1989; 8: 681-7.
3. BEN-TOVIM DF, WALKER MK. Further evidence for the Stroop test as a quantitative measure of psychopathology in eating disorders. Intern J Eat Disord 1991; 10: 609-14.
4. BOON B, STROEBE W, SCHUT H et al. Food for thought: cognitive regulation of food intake. Br J Health Psychol 1998; 3: 27-40.
5. BRUCH H. Psychotherapy in anorexia nervosa. Intern J Eat Disord 1982; 1 (4): 3-14.
6. CALLANAN MA. Development of Object Categories and Inclusion Relations: preschoolers' hypotheses about word. In: Luce D, Suppes P, eds. Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology. San Francisco: Freeman, 1989; 2: 57-105.
7. COOPER M J, ANASTASIADES P, FAIRBURN CG. Selective processing of eating, shape and weight related words in persons with bulimia nervosa. J Abnor Psychol 1992; 101 (2): 352-5.
8. COOPER MJ, CLARK DM, FAIRBURN CG. An experimental study of the relationship between thoughts and eating behaviour in bulimia nervosa. Behav Res Ther 1993; 31 (8): 749-57.
9. COOPER MJ, FAIRBURN CG. Thoughts about eating weight and shape in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Behav Res Ther 1992; 30: 501-11.
10. COOPER MJ, TODD G, WELLS A. Content, origins, and consequences of dysfunctional beliefs in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. J Cogn Psychother 1998; 12 (3): 213-30
11. CORDIER F, TIJUS C. Object properties: a typology. Cah Psychol Cogn/Curr Psychol Cogn 2001; 20 (6): 445-72.
12. DRITSCHEL BH, WILLIAMS K, COOPER PJ. Cognitive distortions among women experiencing bulimic episodes. Intern J Eat Disord 1991; 10 (5): 547-55.
13. FAIRBURN C, SHAFRAN GR, COOPER Z. A cognitive behavioural theory of anorexia nervosa. Behav Res Ther 1999; 37 (1): 1-13.
14. FAIRBURN CG, BEGLIN SJ. Assessment of eating disorders: interview or self-report questionnaire? Intern J Eat Disord 1994; 16 (4): 363-70.
15. FAIRBURN CG, COOPER PKJ, COOPER MJ et al. Selective information processing in bulimia nervosa. Intern J Eat Disord 1991; 10: 415-22.
16. FAIRBURN CG, STEERE J, COOPER PJ. Assessment of the specific psychopathology. In: Fichter MM, ed. Bulimia Nervosa: basic research, diagnosis and therapy. New-York: Wiley, 1990; 37-56.
17. FISCHLER C. L'homnivore. Paris: Odile Jacob, 2001.
18. GARNER DM, OLMSTED MP, POLIVY J. Development and validation of a multidimensional eating inventory for anorexia nervosa and bulimia. Intern J Eat Disord 1983; 2 (2): 15-23.
19. GARNER PM, BEMIS KM. A cognitive behavioral approach to anorexia nervosa. Cogn Ther Res 1982; 6: 123-50.
20. HARRIS EC, BARRACLOUGH B. Excess mortality of mental disorder. Br J Psychiatry 1998; 173: 11-53.
21. KOMATSU LK. Recent views of conceptual structure. Psychol Bull 1992; 112: 500-26.
22. LEUNG N, WALLER G, THOMAS G. Core beliefs in anorexic and bulimic women. J Nerv Ment Dis 1999; 187 (12): 736-41.
23. LÉVI-STRAUSS C. Le totémisme aujourd'hui. Paris: PUF, 1962.
24. MALT B. Category coherence in cross-cultural perspective. Cogn Psychol 1995; 29: 85-148.
25. MARKMAN AB, MAKIN D. Referential communication and category acquisition. J Experiment Psychol 1998; 127 (4): 331-54.
26. MIRABEL-SARRON C, BICHINDARITZ I, SAMUEL-LAJEUNESSE B. The food cognitions questionnaire: preliminary study. World Congress of Psychiatry, Madrid, 1996.
27. MIRABEL-SARRON C, FOULON C, SAMUEL-LAJEUNESSE B. Essai d'approche des troubles de la représentation mentale à partir de stimulus visuels chez des patients anorexiques. Encephale 1992; 18: 623-9.
28. MIRABEL-SARRON C, SAMUEL-LAJEUNESSE B. Assessment of food cognition. Congres of Food Choice, Bruxelles, juillet 1992.
29. MIRABEL-SARRON C, SAMUEL-LAJEUNESSE B. Evaluation des dysfonctionnements cognitifs dans les troubles des conduites alimentaires. Encephale 1998; HS 1: 56-9.
30. MIZES JS. Criterion-related validity of the anorectic cognitions questionnaire. Add Behav 1990; 15: 153-63.
31. MURPHY GL, MEDIN DL. The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychol Rev 1985; 92: 289-316.
32. NELSON K. Le développement de la représentation sémantique chez l'enfant. Psychol Fr 1985; 30: 261-8.
33. PHELAN PW. Cognitive correlates of bulimia: the bulimic thoughts questionnaire. Intern J Eat Disord 1987; 6 (5): 593-607.
34. ROSCH E. Cognitive representations of semantic categories. J Experiment Psychol 1975; 1: 303-22.
35. ROSS BH, MURPHY GL. Food for thought: cross-classification and category organization in a complex real-world domain. Cogn Psychol 1999; 38: 495-555.
36. SAMUEL-LAJEUNESSE B, FOULON C. Les troubles des conduites alimentaires. Paris: Masson, 1994.
37. SCHULMAN RG, KINDER BN, POWERS PS et al. The development of a scale to measure cognitive distortions in bulimia. J Person Assess 1986; 50: 630-9.
38. THOMPSON DA, BERG KM, SHATFORD LA. The heterogeneity of bulimic symptomatology: cognitive and behavioral dimensions. Intern J Eat Disord 1987; 6 (2): 215-34.
39. TVERSKY B, HEMENWAY K. Objects, parts and categories. J Experiment Psychol Gen 1984; 113: 172-91.
40. URDAPILLETA I, BERNARD JM. Quasi-implication in the attribution of verbal descriptors of sensory attributes. Curr Psychol Letters 2002; 3 (9): 21-37.
41. URDAPILLETA I, NICKLAUS S, TIJUS CA. Sensory evaluation based on verbal judgments. J Sensor Stud 1999; 14 (1): 79-96.
42. VON HIPPEL W, HAWKINS C, NARAYAN S. Personality and perceptual expertise: individual differences in perceptual identification. Psychol Sc 1994; 5: 401-6.
43. VRIGNAUD P. Approche différentielle de la typicalité. Thèse de Doctorat de l'Université Paris 5, 1998.
44. WHITE CW, MONTGOMERY DA. Memory colors in afterimages: a bicentennial demonstration. Percept Psychophys 1976; 19: 371-4.
45. WHORF BJ. Languages and logic. In: Carroll JB, ed. Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected papers of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1941: 233-45.