Cohesion in Group Therapy

Psychotherapy

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 34-42

  Burlingame, Gary M ^a   McClendon, Debra Theobald ^a   Alonso, Jennifer ^a  

^a BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cohesion; Group therapy; Meta analysis; Therapy relationship

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; GROUP DYNAMICS; GROUP PSYCHOLOGY; GROUP STRUCTURE; GROUP THERAPY; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); PREDICTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MENTAL DISORDERS; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; PSYCHOTHERAPY, GROUP; QUESTIONNAIRES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79952821256     PISSN: 00333204     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0022063     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Bakali J., Baldwin S., Lorentzen S. Modeling group process constructs at three stages in group psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research 2009, 19:332-343.
2. Bednar R.L., Kaul T.J. Experiential group research: Current perspectives. Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change 1978, 769-815. Wiley, New York. 2nd ed. S.L. Garfield, A.E. Bergin (Eds.).
3. Bednar R.L., Kaul T.J. Experiential group research: Can the canon fire?. Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change 1994, 631-663. Wiley, New York. 4th ed. A.E. Bergin, S.L. Garfield (Eds.).
4. Begg C.B. Publication bias. The handbook of research synthesis 1994, 399-409. Russell Sage Foundation, New York. H. Cooper, L.V. Hedges (Eds.).
5. Berkeljon A., Baldwin S.A. An introduction to meta-analysis for psychotherapy outcome research. Psychotherapy Research 2009, 19:511-518.
6. Bormann B., Strauss B. Gruppenklima, kohäsion, allianz und empathie als komponenten der therapeutischen beziehung in gruppenpsychotherapien-Überprüfung eines mehrebenen-modells. [Group climate, cohesion, alliance, and empathy as components of the therapeutic relationship within group psychotherapy-Test of a multilevel model]. Gruppenpsychotherapie und Gruppendynamik 2007, 43:1-20.
7. Braaten L.J. Predicting positive goal attainment and symptom reduction from early group climate dimensions. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy 1989, 39:377-387.
8. Budman S.H., Soldz S., Demby A., Feldstein M., Springer T., Davis M.S. Cohesion, alliance and outcome in group psychotherapy. Psychiatry 1989, 52:339-350.
9. Burlingame G. Small group treatments: Introduction to special section. Psychotherapy Research 2010, 20:1-7.
10. Burlingame G., Fuhriman A., Johnson J. Cohesion in group psychotherapy. Psychotherapy relationships that work 2002, 71-87. Oxford University Press. J.C. Norcross (Ed.).
11. Burlingame G., McClendon D.T., Alonso J. Group therapy. Psychotherapy relationships that work 2011, Oxford University Press, New York. 2nd ed. J.C. Norcross (Ed.).
12. Burlingame G.M., Barlow S. Outcome and process differences between professional and nonprofessional therapists in time-limited group psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy 1996, 46:455-478.
13. Burlingame G.M., Fuhriman A.F., Mosier J. The differentiated effectiveness of group psychotherapy: A meta-analytic review. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice 2003, 7:3-12.
14. Burlingame G.M., MacKenzie K.R., Strauss B. Evidence-based small group treatments. Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change 2004, Wiley, New York. 5th ed. M. Lambert, A.E. Bergin, S.L. Garfield (Eds.).
15. Chapman C., Baker E., Porter G., Thayer S., Burlingame G. Rating group therapist interventions: The validation of the Group Psychotherapy Rating Scale. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 2010, 14:15-31.
16. Dinger U., Schauenburg H. Effects of individual cohesion and patient interpersonal style on outcome in psychodynamically oriented inpatient group psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research 2010, 20:22-29.
17. Dion K.L. Group cohesion: From " field of forces" to multidimensional construct. Group Dynamics 2000, 4:7-26.
18. Duval S., Tweedie R. A non-parametric " trim and fill" method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2000, 95:89-98.
19. Duval S., Tweedie R. Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 2000, 56:455-463.
20. Evans C.R., Dion K.L. Group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. Small Group Research 1991, 22:175-186.
21. Fuhriman A., Burlingame G. Handbook of group psychotherapy: An empirical and clinical synthesis 1994, Wiley, New York.
22. Gully S.M., Devine D.J., Whitney D.J. A meta-analysis of cohesion and performance: Effects of level of analysis and task interdependence. Small Group Research 1995, 26:497-520.
23. Hedges L.V., Vevea J.L. Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods 1998, 3:486-504.
24. Hoag M.J., Burlingame G.M. Evaluating the effectiveness of child and adolescent group treatment. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 1997, 26:234-246.
25. Hornsey M., Dwyer L., Oei T. Beyond cohesiveness: Reconceptualizing the link between group processes and outcomes in group psychotherapy. Small Group Research 2007, 38:567-592.
26. Hornsey M., Dwyer L., Oei T., Dingle G.A. Group processes and outcomes in group therapy: Is it time to let go of cohesiveness?. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy 2009, 59:267-278.
27. Hurley J.R. Affiliativeness and outcome in interpersonal groups: Member and leader perspectives. Psychotherapy 1989, 26:520-523.
28. Johnson J.E., Burlingame G.M., Olsen J.A., Davies D.R., Gleave R.L. Group climate, cohesion, alliance, and empathy in group psychotherapy: Multilevel structural equation models. Journal of Counseling Psychology 2005, 52:310-321.
29. Kivlighan D.M., Coleman M.N., Anderson D.C. Process, outcome, and methodology in group counseling research. Handbook of counseling psychology 2000, 767-796. Wiley, New York. 3rd ed. S.D. Brown, R.W. Lent (Eds.).
30. Kivlighan D.M., Lilly R.L. Developmental changes in group climate as they relate to therapeutic gain. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 1997, 1:208-221.
31. Kosters M., Burlingame G., Nachtigall C., Strauss B. A meta-analytic review of the effectiveness of inpatient group psychotherapy. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 2006, 10:143-163.
32. Krogel J. The group questionnaire: A new measure of the group relationship 2009, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.
33. Krogel, J., & Burlingame, G. (June 2009). The group questionnaire: A new measure of the therapeutic group relationship. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research. Santiago, Chile.
34. Lipsey M.W., Wilson D.B. Practical meta-analysis 2001, 49. Sage, Thousand Oaks, Applied social research methods series.
35. Lorentzen, S., Høglend, P., & Ruud, T. (2008, June). The efficacy of short- and long-term psychodynamic group psychotherapy: A Norwegian multi-center study. Panel presentation at the annual meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, Barcelona, Spain.
36. McClendon, D., & Burlingame, G. (in press). Group climate: Construct in search of clarity. In R. Conyne (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Group Counseling. New York: Oxford University Press.
37. McRoberts C., Burlingame G.M., Hoag M.J. Comparative efficacy of individual and group psychotherapy: A meta-analytic perspective. Group Dynamics 1998, 2:101-117.
38. Mullen B., Copper C. The relationship between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin 1994, 115:210-227.
39. Roether M.A., Peters J.J. Cohesiveness and hostility in group psychotherapy. American Journal of Psychiatry 1972, 128:1014-1017.
40. Schauenburg H., Sammet I., Rabung S., Strack M. Zur differentiellen bedeutung des gruppenerlebens in der stationaren psychotherapie depressiver patienten [On the differential importance of group experience in inpatient psychotherapy of depressive patients]. Gruppenpsychotherapie und Gruppendynamik 2001, 37:349-364.
41. Snijders, J. A., Trijsburg, R. W., De Groot, M. H., & Duivenvoorden, H. J. (2006, March). Group cohesion, working alliance, and therapeutic interventions as factors predicting outcome in group psychotherapy for personality disorders: First results of a follow-along study (2003-2006). Presented at AGPA Research Symposium, New York.
42. Sternburg, S., & Trijburg, W. (2005). The relationship between therapeutic interventions and therapeutic outcome. Unpublished manuscript. Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands.
43. Strauss B., Burlingame G., Bormann B. Using the CORE-R batter in group psychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology 2008, 64:1225-1237.
44. Tschuschke V., Dies R.R. Intensive analysis of therapeutic factors and outcome in long-term inpatient groups. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy 1994, 44:185-208.
45. Yalom I., Houts P.S., Zimerberg S.M., Rand K.H. Prediction of improvement in group therapy: An exploratory study. Archives of General Psychiatry 1967, 17:159-168.
46. Yalom I.D., Leszcz M. The theory and practice of group psychotherapy 2005, Basic Books, New York. 5th ed.