Using the CORE-R battery in group psychotherapy

Journal of Clinical Psychology

Volumn 64, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 1225-1237

  Strauss, Bernhard ^a   Burlingame, Gary M ^b   Bormann, Bianca ^a  

^a JENA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Germany)

^b BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Core battery; Group therapy; Measures; Outcome; Process; Selection

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL OUTCOME RESULTS STANDARDIZED MEASURES; CLINICAL PRACTICE; EMPATHY; GROUP PROCESS; GROUP THERAPY; HUMAN; MEDICAL SOCIETY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT MONITORING; PATIENT SELECTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL RATING SCALE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF ESTEEM; SELF REPORT; UNITED STATES;

HUMANS; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOTHERAPY, GROUP;

EID: 57149104402     PISSN: 00219762     EISSN: 10974679     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.20535     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Asay, T.P., Lambert, M.J., Gregersen, A.T., & Goates, M.K. (2002). Using patient-focused research in evaluating treatment outcome in private practice. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 1213-1225.
2. Battle, C.C., Imber, S.E., Hoehn-Saric, R., Stone, A.R., Nash, E.R., & Frank, J.D. (1966). Target complaints as criteria of improvement. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 20, 184-192.
3. Bednar, R.L., & Kaul, T.J. (1994). Experiential group research: Can the cannon fire? In A.E. Bergin & S.L. Garfield, (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (4th ed., pp. 631-663). New York: Wiley & Sons.
4. Bordin, E.S. (1976). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy, 16, 252-260.
5. Bormann, B., & Strauss, B. (2007). Gruppenklima, Kohäsion, Allianz und Empathie als Komponenten der therapeutischen Beziehung in Gruppenpsychotherapien - Überprüfung eines Mehrebenen-Modells [Group climate, cohesion, alliance, and empathy as components of the therapeutic relationship within group psychotherapy - Test of a multilevel model]. Gruppenpsychotherapie und Gruppendynamik, 43, 1-20.
6. Burlingame, G.M., MacKenzie, K.R., & Strauss, B. (2004). Small group treatment: Evidence for effectiveness and mechanisms of change. In M.J. Lambert, (Ed.), Begin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (4th ed., pp. 647-696). New York: Wiley.
7. Burlingame, G.M., Strauss, B., Joyce, A., MacNair-Semands, R., MacKenzie, K.R., Ogrodniczuk, J., et al. (2006). CORE battery - revised: An assessment tool kit for promoting optimal group selection, process and outcome. New York: AGPA.
8. Burlingame, G.M., Fuhriman, A., & Johnson, J. (2002). Cohesion in group psychotherapy. In J.C. Norcross, (Ed.), A guide to psychotherapy relationships that work (pp. 71-88). Oxford University Press.
9. Cox, J., Burlingame, G.N., Davies, R., Gleave, R., & Barlow, S. (2004). The group selection questionnaire: Further refinements in group member selection. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Group Psychology association, New York.
10. Hatfield, D.R., & Ogles, B.M. (2007). Why some clinicians use outcome measures and others do not. Administration and policy in mental health and mental health services research, 34, 283-291.
11. Hess, H. (1996). Zwei Verfahren zur Einschätzung der Wirksamkeit von Gruppenpsychotherapie. [Two methods to assess the effectiveness of group psychotherapy.] In B. Strauss, J. Eckert, & V. Tschuschke, (Eds.), Methoden der empirischen Gruppentherapieforschung - Ein Handbuch (pp. 142-158). [Methods of empirical group psychotherapy research - A user guide.] Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
12. Horowitz, L.M. (1999). Manual for the inventory of interpersonal problems. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.
13. Horvath, A.O., & Greenberg, L.S. (1989). Development and validation of the working alliance inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 223-233.
14. Johnson, J.E., Burlingame, G.M., Olsen, J., Davies, D.R., & Gleave, R. (2005). Group climate, cohesion, alliance, and empathy in group psychotherapy: Multilevel structural equation models. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 310-321.
15. Kiesler, D.J. (1996). Contemporary interpersonal theory and research. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
16. Lambert, M.J., Hannöver, W., Nisslmüller, K., Richard, M., & Kordy, H. (2002). Fragebogen zum Ergebnis von Psychotherapie. Zur Reliabilität und Validität der deutschen Übersetzung des Outcome Questionnaire 45.2 (OQ-45.2) [Questionnaire on the results of psychotherapy: Reliability and validity of the German translation of the Outcome Questionnaire 45.2 (OQ-45.2)]. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 31, 40-47.
17. Lambert, M.J., Hansen, N.B., Umphress, V., Lunnen, K., Okiishi, J., Burlingame, et al. (1996). Administration and scoring manual for the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45.2). Wilmington, DL: American Professional Credentialing Services.
18. Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald Press.
19. Lese, K.P., & MacNair-Semands, R.R. (2000). The therapeutic factors inventory: Development of a scale. Group, 24, 303-317.
20. Löffler, J., Bormann, B., Burlingame, G.B., & Strauss, B. (2007). Deutsche Version des Group Selection Questionnaire [Patient Selection for Group Psychotherapy - A Validation Study of the Group Selection Questionnaire (GSQ) in German Clinical Sample]. Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 55, 75-86.
21. MacKenzie, K.R. (1983). The clinical application of a group climate measure. In R.R. Dies, & K.R. MacKenzie, (Eds.), Advances in group psychotherapy: Integrating research and practise (pp. 159-170). New York: International Universities Press.
22. MacKenzie, K.R. (1987). Therapeutic factors in group psychotherapy. Group, 11, 26-34.
23. MacKenzie, K.R., & Dies, R. (1982). AGPA CORE-Battery. New York: AGPA.
24. MacNair-Semands, R.R. (2002). Predicting attendance and expectations for group therapy. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 6, 219-228.
25. MacNair-Semands, R.R., & Corazzini, J. (1998). Manual for the group therapy questionnaire (GTQ). Copyright with Counseling Services at Virginia Commonwealth University and UNC at Charlotte Counseling Center.
26. Person, J.B., & Burns, D.D. (1985). Mechanisms of action of cognitive therapy: Relative contribution of technical and interpersonal intervention. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 9, 539-551.
27. Piper, W.E., Marrache, M., Lacroix, R., Richardsen, A.M., & Jones, B.D. (1983). Cohesion as a basic bond in groups. Human Relations, 36, 93-108.
28. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29. Strauss, B., & Burgmeier-Lohse, M. (1994). Stationäre Langzeitgruppentherapie. [Inpatient long-term group psychotherapy.] Heidelberg: Asanger.
30. Sullivan, H.S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: Norton.
31. Tschuschke, V. (2002). Der Gruppenklima-Fragebogen (GCQ-S). [The group climate questionnaire.] In E. Brähler, J. Schumacher, & B. Strauss, (Eds.), Diagnostische Verfahren in der Psychotherapie (pp. 163-166). [Diagnostic Methods in Psychotherapy.] Göttingen: Hogrefe.