Mathematics learning and tools from theoretical, historical and practical points of view: The productive notion of mathematics laboratories

ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 33-47

  Maschietto, Michela ^a   Trouche, Luc ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MODENA AND REGGIO EMILIA   (Italy)

^b National Institute for Pedagogical Research   (France)

Author keywords

Artefacts; Instrumentalisation; Instrumentation; Instruments; Orchestration; Semiotic mediation

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952817699     PISSN: 18639690     EISSN: 18639704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11858-009-0215-3     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. AA. VV. UMI (2004). In G. Anichini, F. Arzarello, L. Ciarrapico, & O. Robutti (Eds.), Matematica 2003. La matematica per il cittadino. Attività didattiche e prove di verifica per un nuovo curricolo di Matematica (Ciclo secondario). Lucca: Matteoni stampatore. English version: http://umi.dm.unibo.it/italiano/Didattica/ICME10.pdf. Accessed May 2009.
2. Adler, J. (2000). Conceptualising resources as a theme for teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3, 205-224.
3. Ainley, J. (2000). Transparency in graphs and graphing tasks: An iterative design process. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19, 365-384.
4. Barozzi, I., & Danti, E. (1583). Le due regole della prospettiva prattica di M. Iacomo Barozzi da Vignola, Con i Commentari del Reuerendo Padre Maestro Egnatio Danti dell'Ordine de' Predicatori Mattematico dello Studio di Bologna. Bologna: Edizione Zannetti.
5. Bartolini Bussi, M. G. (1996). Mathematical discussion and perspective drawing in primary school. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31, 11-41.
6. Bartolini Bussi, M. G., & Mariotti, M. A. (2008). Semiotic mediation in the mathematics classroom: Artifacts and signs after a Vygotskian perspective. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (2nd ed., pp. 746-783). New York: Routledge.
7. Bartolini Bussi, M. G., & Maschietto, M. (2006). Macchine matematiche: dalla storia alla scuola. Collana UMI Convergenze. Milano: Springer.
8. Bartolini Bussi, M. G., & Maschietto, M. (2008). Machines as tools in teacher education. In D. Tirosh, & T. Wood (Eds.), The international handbook of mathematics teacher education, Tools and Processes in Mathematics Teacher Education. (Vol. 2, pp.183-208). Rotterdam: SensePublisher.
9. Berdeillé, Ch. (1902). Sur l'usage du papier rayé en algèbre. L'enseignement mathématique, 4, 455.
10. Borel, E. (1904). Les exercices pratiques de mathématiques dans l'enseignement secondaire. InConference atMuséePédagogique in Paris, Gazette desMathematiciens, Juillet 2002 (no. 93, pp. 47-64).
11. Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactic situations. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
12. Cerulli, M., Trgalova, J., Maracci, M., Psycharis, G., & Georget, J. P. (2008). Comparing theoretical frameworks enacted in experimental research: TELMA experience. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40, 201-213. doi:10.1007/s11858-008-0075-2.
13. Churchhouse, R. F., Cornu, B., Ershov, A. P., Howson, A. G., Kahane, J. P., van Lint, J. H., et al. (1985). An ICMI discussion document. The influence of computers and informatics on mathematics and its teaching. Strasbourg: IREM, ULP.
14. CIEM. (1908). Les tendances modernes de l'enseignement mathématique. L'enseignement mathématiques, 10, 454.
15. Drijvers, P., Doorman, M., Boon, P., & van Gisbergen, S. (2009). Instrumental orchestration, theory and practice. In F. Arzarello (Ed.), Proceedings of the sixth conference of the European Society for research in mathematics education. Lyon (to appear).
16. Dürer, A. (1525). Underweysung der Messung mit Zirkel und Richtscheit. French translation.
17. Peiffer, J. (1995). Géométrie. Paris: Edition Seuil.
18. Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2009). Towards new documentation systems for mathematics teachers? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71, 199-218. doi:10.1007/s10649-008-9159.
19. Guin, D., Ruthven, K., & Trouche, L. (Eds.). (2005). The didactical challenge of symbolic calculators: turning a computational device into a mathematical instrument. New York: Springer.
20. Guin, D., & Trouche, L. (2006). Distance training, a key mode to support teachers in the integration of ICT? Towards collaborative conception of living pedagogical resources. In M. Bosch (Ed.), Proceedings of the fourth conference of the European Society for research in mathematics education (pp. 1020-1030). FUNDEMI IQS Universitat. http://ermeweb.free.fr/CERME4/. Accessed May 2009.
21. Hivon, L., Péan, M., & Trouche, L. (2008). D'un réseau de calculatrices à la construction collaborative du savoir dans la classe. Repères-IREM, 72, 79-102.
22. Hoyles, C., & Lagrange, J. B. (2005). Mathematical education and digital technologies: Rethinking the terrain. Discussion document for 17th ICMI study. http://www.math.msu.edu/*nathsinc/ICMI/. Accessed May 2009.
23. Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (2003). What can digital technologies take from and bring to research in mathematics education? In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 323-349). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
24. Kahane, J. P. (2006). Cooperation and competition as a challenge in and beyond the classroom. ICMI Study N. 16 Conference. http://www.amt.canberra.edu.au/icmis16pkahane.pdf. Accessed May 2009.
25. Lagrange, J. B., Artigue, M., Laborde, C., & Trouche, L. (2003). Technology and mathematics education: A multidimensional study of the evolution of research and innovation. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 239-271). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
26. Maschietto, M. (2005). The laboratory of mathematical machines of Modena. Newsletter of the European Mathematical Society, 57, 34-37.
27. Maschietto, M., & Ferri, F. (2007). Artefacts, schèmes d'utilisation et significations arithmétiques. In J. Szendrei (Ed.), Mathematical activity in classroom practice and as research object in didactics: Two complementary perspectives, Proceeding of the CIEAEM 59 (pp. 179-183). Dobogók}o, Hungary.
28. Meira, L. (1998). Making sense of instructional devices: The emergence of transparency in mathematical activity. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(2), 121-142.
29. Nagaoka, R., et al. (2000). Chapter 10. Non-standard media and other resources. In J. Fauvel & J. van Maanen (Eds.), History in mathematics education. The ICMI study (Vol. 10, pp. 329-370). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
30. Petrovitch, M. (1899). Sur l'intégration hydraulique des équations différentielles. L'enseignement mathématique, 1, 58-59.
31. Prediger, S., Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., & Arzarello, F. (2008). Networking strategies and methods for connecting theoretical approaches: First steps towards a conceptual framework. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40, 165-178. doi: 10.1007/s11858-008-0086-z.
32. Proust, C. (2000). La multiplication babylonienne: la part non écrite du calcul. Revue d'histoire des mathématiques, 6, 293-303.
33. Robutti, O. (2010). Graphic calculators and connectivity software to be a community of mathematics practitioners. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education (this issue).
34. Rocard, M., Csermely, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Walberg-Henriksson, H., & Hemmo, V. (2007). Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/report-rocard-on-science-education_en.pdf. Accessed May 2009.
35. Schärlig, A. (2003). Compter avec des jetons. Lausanne: Presses polytechniques et universitaires romanes.
36. Trouche, L. (2004). Managing complexity of human/machine interactions in computerized learning environments: Guiding student's command process through instrumental orchestrations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 9(3), 281-307.
37. Trouche, L., & Hivon, L. (2009). Connectivity: New challenges for the ideas of webbing and orchestrations. In: C. Hoyles, & J. B. Lagrange (Eds.), Mathematical education and digital technologies: Rethinking the terrain, Proceedings of the 17th ICMI study. New York: Springer.
38. Verillon, P., & Rabardel, P. (1995). Cognition and artifacts: A contribution to the study of thought in relation to instrument activity. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 9(3), 77-101.
39. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40. Wartofsky, M. (1979). Perception, representation, and the forms of action: Towards an historical epistemology. In M. Wartofsky (Ed.), Models. Representation, and the scientific understanding (pp. 188-209). Dordrecht: Reidel.