Regime-building for REDD+: Evidence from a cluster of local initiatives in south-eastern Peru

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 201-215

  Hajek, Frank ^a,b   Ventresca, Marc J ^b   Scriven, Joel ^a   Castro, Augusto ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c Ministerio del Ambiente   (Peru)

Author keywords

Forest; Innovation; Logics; Market; Organizations; Peru; REDD+; Regime; Technology

Indexed keywords

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEFORESTATION; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FOREST STRUCTURE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT; ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE; PERU; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STANDARD; WATERSHED;

EID: 79952624545     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.12.007     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Adler E., Haas P.M. Epistemic communities, world order, and the creation of a reflective research program. International Organization 1992, 46(1):367-390.
2. AIDESEP, 2010. Pronunciamiento: Sin Territorios, Derechos y Consulta Indígenas no puede haber concesiones REDD, forestales, petroleras y de servicios ambientales. Lima, Peru: 1.
3. Angelsen, A., Atmadja S., 2008. What is this book about? Moving Ahead with REDD: Issues, Options and Implications. A. Angelsen. Bogor, Indonesia, CIFOR: 156.
4. Angelsen, A., Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S., 2008. What are the key design issues for REDD and the criteria for assessing options? Moving Ahead with REDD A. Angelsen. Bogor, CIFOR, pp.11-21.
5. Asner G.P., Knapp D.E., et al. Automated mapping of tropical deforestation and forest degradation: CLASlite. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 2009, 3:033543.
6. Blaser, J., 2010. Peru Readiness Preparation Proposal Synthesis Review June 2010, Forest Carbon Partnership Facility, p. 20.
7. Blom B., Sunderland T., et al. Getting REDD to work locally: lessons learned from integrated conservation and development projects. Environmental Science and Policy 2010, 13(2):164-172.
8. Bond, I., Grieg-Gran, M., et al., 2009. Incentives to sustain forest ecosystem services: a review and lessons for REDD. Natural Resource Issues No. 16, International Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK; CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia; World Resources Institute, Washington D.C., USA.
9. Broich M., Stehman S.V., et al. A comparison of sampling designs for estimating deforestation from Landsat imagery: a case study of the Brazilian Legal Amazon. Remote Sensing of Environment 2009.
10. Cenamo M.C., Pavan M.N., et al. Casebook of REDD Projects in Latin America 2009, IDESAM, Manaus, Brazil.
11. Corbera E., Soberanis C.G., et al. Institutional dimensions of payments for ecosystem services: an analysis of Mexico's carbon forestry programme. Ecological Economics 2009, 68(3):743-761.
12. Corbera E., Schroeder H. Governing and implementing REDD+. Environmental Science and Policy 2011, 14:89-99.
13. Daily G.C., Matson P.A. Ecosystem services: from theory to implementation. PNAS 2008, 105(28):9455-9456.
14. Daily G.C.e. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems 1997, Island Press., Washington D.C.
15. Ecosecurities Transaction Structures and Actors in Forest Carbon Markets 2009, Ecosecurities, Oxford. J. Fehse (Ed.).
16. EIU, 2008. What's new in your industry. Business Latin America, Economist Intelligence Unit, 43, pp. 7-7.
17. FENAMAD, 2010. Propuesta de la Federacion Nativa del Rio Madre de Dios y Afluentes (FENAMAD) a los hermanos indigenas de Peru y la Amazonia - REDD Indigena. Puerto Maldonado.
18. Fligstein N. The Architecture of Markets: An Economic Sociology of Capitalist Societies in the 21st century 2002, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
19. Gómez-Baggethun E., de Groot R., et al. The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecological Economics 2010, 69(6):1209-1218.
20. Griscom B., Shoch D., et al. Sensitivity of amounts and distribution of tropical forest carbon credits depending on baseline rules. Environmental Science and Policy 2009, 12(7):897-911.
21. Haas P.M. Saving the Mediterranean: The Politics of International Environmental Cooperation 1990, Columbia University Press, New York.
22. Hajek, F., 2009. The 'Invisibility' of Nature and Ecosystem Services Markets: Insights into market creation from an emerging market in Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD) in Peru. Saïd Business School, Oxford University. MBA research thesis, p. 36.
23. Huertas Castillo B. Indigenous Peoples in Isolation in the Peruvian Amazon 2004, International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs, Copenhagen, Denmark.
24. Hughes, T.P., 1989. The Evolution of Large Technological Systems. The Social Construction of Technological Systems. W. Bijker, T.P. Hughes and Pinch, The MIT Press, pp. 51-82.
25. INRENA, CDC, et al., 2003. Hacia un sistema de monitoreo remoto ambiental estandarizado para el SINANPE. Lima, INRENA, p. 78.
26. Kanowski P.J., McDermott C.L., Cashore B.W. Implementing REDD+: lessons from analysis of forest governance. Environmental Science and Policy 2011, 14:111-117.
27. Kaplan S., Murray F. Entrepreneurship and the creation of value. Research in the Sociology of Organizations 2010, 29:107-147.
28. Kaplinsky R. Spreading the gains from globalization. Problems of Economic Transition 2004, 47(2):74-115.
29. Lounsbury M., Ventresca M.J., et al. Social movements, field frames, industry emergence: cultural-political perspective on US recycling. Socio-Economic Review 2003, 1(1):71-104.
30. Malhi Y., Phillips O.L., et al. An international network to monitor the structure, composition and dynamics of Amazonian forests (RAINFOR). Journal of Vegetation Science 2002, 13(3):439-450.
31. McDermott C.L., Cashore B., et al. Global Environmental Forest Policies: An International Comparison 2010, Earthscan, London.
32. Meyer J.W., Rowan B. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 1977, 83(2):340-363.
33. MINAG, 2010. Ley Forestal y Fauna Silvestre - Version Preliminar Junio 2010: 43.
34. MINAG, 2010. Política Nacional Forestal y de Fauna Silvestre - Version Preliminar Junio 2010, p. 17.
35. Moore, R., 2010. "Introducing Google Earth Engine" Retrieved Monday 13th December 2010, from http://blog.google.org/2010/12/introducing-google-earth-engine.html.
36. Muradian R., Corbera E., et al. Reconciling theory and practice: an alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics 2010, 69(6):1202-1208.
37. Myers N., Mittermeier R.A., et al. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 2000, 403:853-858.
38. Nepstad D., Soares-Filho B.S., et al. The end of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Science 2009, 326:2.
39. Olson D.M., Dinerstein E., et al. Terrestrial ecoregions of the World: a new map of life on earth. Bioscience 2001, 51(11):933-938.
40. Pedroni L., Dutschke M., et al. Creating incentives for avoiding further deforestation: the nested approach. Climate Policy 2008, 8.
41. Phelps J., Webb E.L., et al. Does REDD+ threaten to recentralize forest governance?. Science 2010, 328:2.
42. Porac, J.F., Ventresca, M.J., et al., 2002. Interorganizational Cognition and Interpretation. Companion to Organizations. J.A.C. Baum, Blackwell.
43. Ramirez R. Value co-production: intellectual origins and implications for practice and research. Strategic Management Journal 1999, 20:49-65.
44. Ramirez R., Wallin J. Prime Movers 2000, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.
45. Rayner S. Human Capital Social Capital and Institutional Capacity Linkages of Sustainability 2009, MIT Press. T. Graedel, E. van der Voet (Eds.).
46. Rendon Thomson, O.R., Baker, T.R., et al., 2009. Criterios e indicadores para proyectos REDD, Proyecto 'Fortalecimiento de Capacidades para Pagos por Servicios Ambientales (carbono y biodiversidad) en la Amazonia Peruana', University of Leeds.
47. Santos F.M., Eisenhardt K.M. Constructing markets and shaping boundaries: entrepreneurial power in nascent fields. Academy of Management Journal 2009, 52(4):643-671.
48. Scott W.R. Institutions and Organizations: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis. Institutional Environments and Organizations: Structural Complexity and Individualism 1994, 55-80. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks. W.R. Scott, J.W. Meyer (Eds.).
49. Scriven, J.N.H., 2010. Markets and payments for ecosystems services: engaging REDD+ on Peru's Amazonian frontier. Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, UK. Doctoral (D.Phil.) thesis.
50. Soares-Filho B.S., Nepstad D.C., et al. Modelling conservation in the Amazon basin. Nature 2006, 440:520-523.
51. Suddaby R., Greenwood R. Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly 2005, 50(1):35-67.
52. Tarapoto, D.d., 2008. Un compromiso y un plan de acción para la Reducción de Emisiones Derivadas de la Deforestacíón y la Degradación de Bosques en el Perú.
53. Tollefson J. Counting carbon in the Amazon. Nature 2009, 5.
54. Van Dijck P. Troublesome construction: the rationale and risks of IIRSA. Una construcción problemática: Razones y riesgos de IIRSA 2008, (85):101-120.
55. Vatn A. An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics 2010, 69(6):1245-1252.
56. Ventresca, M.J., Hajek, F., 2010. Technology-Market-Organization (T-M-O): Strategies for Study, Policy and Action in Dynamic Technology Fields. Course Note, Saïd Business School.