Top-down and bottom-up deficits in conflict adaptation after frontal lobe damage

Cognitive Neuropsychology

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 360-375

  Funes, María J ^a   Lupiáñez, Juan ^a   Humphreys, Glyn ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Brain lesion; Cognitive control; Conflict monitoring; Frontal lobes; Stroop

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; AGED; COGNITION; COGNITIVE DEFECT; CONFLICT; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PSYCHOLOGY;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; AGED; COGNITION; COGNITION DISORDERS; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREFRONTAL CORTEX;

EID: 79952606690     PISSN: 02643294     EISSN: 14640627     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02643294.2010.532618     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652.
2. Botvinick, M., Nystrom, L. E., Fissell, K., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (1999). Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature, 402, 179-181.
3. Burgess, P. W., & Shallice, T. (1997). The Hayling and Brixton Tests. Bury St Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company.
4. Carter, C. S., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Botvinick, M. M., Noll, D., & Cohen, J. D. (1998). Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science, 280, 747-749.
5. Carter, C. S., MacDonald, A. M., Botvinick, M., Ross, L. L., Stenger, V. A., Noll, D., et al. (2000). Parsing executive processes: Strategic vs. evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 97, 1944-1948.
6. Casey, B. J., Thomas, K. M., Welsh, T. F., Badgaiyan, R. D., Eccard, C. H., Jennings, J. R., et al. (2000). Dissociation of response conflict, attentional selection, and expectancy with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 97, 8728-8733.
7. Crump, M. J., Gong, Z., & Milliken, B. (2006). The context-specific proportion congruent Stroop effect: Location as a contextual cue. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, 316-321.
8. Crump, M. J., Vaquero, J. M., & Milliken, B. (2008). Context-specific learning and control: The roles of awareness, task relevance, and relative salience. Consciousness & Cognition, 17, 22-36.
9. di Pellegrino, G., Ciaramelli, E., & Làdavas, E. (2007). The regulation of cognitive control following rostral anterior cingulate cortex lesion in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(2), 275-286.
10. Egner, T., & Hirsch, J. (2005). The neural correlates and functional integration of cognitive control in a Stroop task. NeuroImage, 24, 539-547.
11. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a non-search task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
12. Fellows, L. K., & Farah, M. J. (2005). Is anterior cingu-late cortex necessary for cognitive control? Brain, 128,788-796.
13. Freitas, A. L., Bahar, M., Yang, S., & Banai, R. (2007). Contextual adjustments in cognitive control across tasks. Psychological Science, 18, 1040-1043.
14. Gado, M., Hanaway, J., & Frank, R. (1979). Functional-anatomy of the cerebral cortex by computed tomography. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 3(1), 1-19.
15. Gratton, G., Coles, M.G. H., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information-strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480-506.
16. Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68, 1-17.
17. Kerns, J.G., Cohen, J.D., Macdonald, A.W., Cho, R.Y., Stenger, V.A., & Carter, C.S. (2004). Anteriorcingu-late conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science, 303, 1023-1026.
18. Kornblum, S. (1992). Dimensional overlap and dimensional relevance in stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility. In G. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior II (pp. 743-777). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.
19. Kornblum, S. (1994). The way irrelevant dimensions are processed depends on what they overlap with: The case of Stroop and Simon-like stimuli. Psychological Research, 56, 130-135.
20. Kornblum, S., & Lee, J.-W. (1995). A study of stimu-lus-response compatibility with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions that do and do not overlap with the response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 855-875.
21. Kunde, W., & Wuhr, P. (2006). Sequential modulations of correspondence effects across spatial dimensions and tasks. Memory and Cognition, 34, 356-367.
22. Lhermitte, F.(1983).Utilisationbehaviouranditsrelation to lesions of the frontal lobes. Brain, 106, 237-255.
23. Lu, C.-H., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon effect and congruency effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174-207.
24. MacDonald, A. W., Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2000). Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulated cortex in cognitive control. Science, 288, 1835-1838.
25. Macleod, C. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
26. Mansouri, F. A., Buckley, M. J., & Tanaka, K. (2007). Mnemonic function of the dorsolateral pre-frontal cortex in conflict-induced behavioral adjustment. Science, 318, 987-990.
27. Mayr, U., Awh, E., & Laurey, P. (2003). Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 450-452.
28. Naccache, L., Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Habert, M. O., Guichart-Gomez, E., Galanaud, D., et al. (2005). Effortless control: Executive attention and conscious feeling of mental effort are dissociable. Neuropsychologia, 43, 1318-1328.
29. Nelson, H., & Willison, J. (1991). The Revised National Adult Reading Test (NART)-test manual (2nd ed.). Windsor, UK, NFER-Nelson.
30. Notebaert, W., Gevers, W., Verbruggen, F., & Liefooghe, B. (2006). Top-down and bottom-up sequential modulations of congruency effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13(1), 112-117.
31. Notebaert, W., Soetens, E., & Melis, A. (2001). Sequential analysis of a Simon task. Evidence for an attention-shift account. Psychological Research, 65, 170-184.
32. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002a). E-Prime reference guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
33. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002b). E-Prime user's guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
34. Simon, J. R., & Craft, J. L. (1972). Reaction time in an oddity task. Responding to the different element of a three-light display. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 92, 405-411.
35. Simon, J. R., Craft, J. L., & Webster, J. B. (1973). Reactions toward the stimulus source: Analysis of correct responses and errors over a five-day period. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 97-102.
36. Simon, J. R., & Small, A. M. (1969). Processing auditory toward the stimulus source: Analysis of correctresponses and errors over a five-day period. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 101, 175-178.
37. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
38. Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1345-1363.
39. Swick, D., & Jovanovic, J. (2002). Anterior cingulated cortex and the Stroop task: Neuropsychological evidence for topographic specificity. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1240-1253.
40. Ullsperger, M., Bylsma, L. M., & Botvinick, M. M. (2005). The conflict adaptation effect: It's not just priming. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 467-472.
41. Verbruggen, F., Liefooghe, B., Notebaert, W., & Vandierendonck, A. (2005). Effects of stimulus-stimulus compatibility and stimulus-response compatibility on response inhibition. Acta Psychologica, 120, 307-326.
42. Wühr, P., & Ansorge, U. (2005). Exploring trial-bytrial modulations of the Simon effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 705-731.