Activity of daily living staging, chronic health conditions, and perceived lack of home accessibility features for elderly people living in the community

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 454-462

  Stineman, Margaret G ^a   Xie, Dawei ^a   Pan, Qiang ^a   Kurichi, Jibby E ^a   Saliba, Debra ^b   Streim, Joel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Activities of daily living; Biopsycho ecological framework; Chronic disease; Environment; Staging

Indexed keywords

AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; CHRONIC DISEASE; COMMUNITY CARE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DEMENTIA; DISEASE SEVERITY; ELDERLY CARE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE NEED; HEALTH STATUS; HOME CARE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL HISTORY; RACISM; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEX DIFFERENCE; STROKE;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARCHITECTURAL ACCESSIBILITY; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; CHRONIC DISEASE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DISABLED PERSONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; NEOPLASMS; OSTEOPOROSIS; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 79952583434     PISSN: 00028614     EISSN: 15325415     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03287.x     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. Older Americans 2008: Key indicators of well-being [on-line]. Available at http://www. agingstats.gov/agingstatsdotnet/Main-Site/Data/2008-Documents/Health-Status.pdf Accessed March 22, 2010.
2. Population Division. DESA, United Nations, World Population Ageing 1950-2050: Executive Summary [on-line]. Available at http://www.un.org/esa/ population/publications/worldageing19502050/pdf/90chapteriv.pdf Accessed February 24, 2010.
3. Winker MA, DeAngelis CD. Caring for an aging population: Call for papers. JAMA 2010;303:455-456.
4. National Academy on an Aging Society. Caregiving: Helping the Elderly with Activity Limitations [on-line]. Available at http://www.agingsociety.org/ agingsociety/pdf/Caregiving.pdf Accessed March, 27, 2010.
5. Committee on Disability in America. The Future of Disability in America, 1st Ed. Field MJ JA, editor.Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2007, p. 618.
6. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2001.
7. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RWet al. Studies of illness in the aged. The Index of ADL: A standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA 1963;185:914-919.
8. Stineman MG, Ross RN, Fiedler R et al. Functional independence staging: Conceptual foundation, face validity, and empirical derivation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:29-37. (Pubitemid 36090110)
9. Jette DU, Warren RL, Wirtalla C. Validity of functional independence staging in patients receiving rehabilitation in skilled nursing facilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:1095-1101. (Pubitemid 40797761)
10. Jette DU, Warren RL, Wirtalla C. The relation between therapy intensity and outcomes of rehabilitation in skilled nursing facilities. Arch PhysMed Rehabil 2005;86:373-379. (Pubitemid 40326612)
11. Stineman MG, Kurichi JE, Kwong PL et al. Survival analysis in amputees based on physical independence grade achievement. Arch Surg 2009;144:543-551.
12. Stineman MG, Ross RN, Granger CV et al. Predicting the achievement of 6 grades of physical independence from data routinely collected at admission to rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:1647-1656. (Pubitemid 37411852)
13. Stineman MG, Streim JE. The biopsycho-ecological paradigm: A foundational theory for medicine. PM&R 2010;2:1035-1045.
14. Werngren-ElgstromM, Carlsson G, Iwarsson S. A 10-year follow-up study on subjective well-being and relationships to person-environment (P-E) fit and activity of daily living (ADL) dependence of older Swedish adults. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2009;49:e16-e22.
15. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373-383. (Pubitemid 17055592)
16. Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR et al. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care 1998;36:8-27. (Pubitemid 128456396)
17. McGee D, Cooper R, Liao Yet al. Patterns of comorbidity and mortality risk in blacks and whites. Ann Epidemiol 1996;6:381-385.
18. Stineman MG, Ross RN, Williams SVet al. A functional diagnostic complexity index for rehabilitation medicine: Measuring the influence of many diagnoses on functional independence and resource use. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:549-557.
19. Lawton MP, Simon B. The ecology of social relationships in housing for the elderly. Gerontologist 1968;8:108-115.
20. Liu SY, Lapane KL. Residential modifications and decline in physical function among community-dwelling older adults. Gerontologist 2009;49:344-354.
21. Stineman MG, Ross RN, Maislin G et al. Population-based study of home accessibility features and the activities of daily living: Clinical and policy implications. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:1165-1175. (Pubitemid 47180639)
22. Covinsky KE, Yaffe K, Lindquist K et al. Depressive symptoms in middle age and the development of later-life functional limitations: The long-term effect of depressive symptoms. J Am Geriatr Soc 2010;58:551-556.
23. Fried LP, Ferrucci L, Darer J et al. Untangling the concepts of disability, frailty, and comorbidity: Implications for improved targeting and care. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2004;59A:255-263. (Pubitemid 38375339)
24. Gijsen R, Hoeymans N, Schellevis FG et al. Causes and consequences of comorbidity: A review. J Clin Epidemiol 2001;54:661-674. (Pubitemid 32594852)
25. Tabbarah M, Silverstein M, Seeman T. A health and demographic profile of noninstitutionalized older Americans residing in environments with home modifications. J Aging Health 2000;12:204-228. (Pubitemid 30230642)
26. National Center for Health Statistics (1998). Data File Documentation-National Health Interview Second Supplement on Aging-1994 (Machine Readable Data File and Documentation). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 1998.
27. National Center for Health Statistics. The Second Longitudinal Study on Aging, 1994-2000 [on-line]. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/lsoa/lsoa2.htm Accessed December 9, 2009.
28. Stineman MG, Ross RN, Maislin G. Functional statusmeasures for integrating medical and social care. Int J Integr Care 2005;5:e07.
29. Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD et al. The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:127-132.
30. Boyington JE, Howard DL, Holmes DN. Self-rated health, activities of daily living, and mobility limitations among black and white stroke survivors. J Aging Health 2008;20:920-939.
31. Carod-Artal FJ, Egido JA. Quality of life after stroke: The importance of a good recovery. Cerebrovasc Dis 2009;27(Suppl 1):204-214.
32. Herman DR, Solomons NW, Mendoza I et al. Self-rated health and its relationship to functional status and well-being in a group of elderly Guatemalan subjects. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2001;10:176-182. (Pubitemid 33739351)
33. Lee Y. The predictive value of self assessed general, physical, andmental health on functional decline and mortality in older adults. J Epidemiol Commun Health 2000;54:123-129. (Pubitemid 30066246)
34. Leinonen R, Heikkinen E, Jylha M. A path analysis model of self-rated health among older people. Aging (Milano) 1999;11:209-220.
35. Maddox GL, Douglass EB. Self-assessment of health: A longitudinal study of elderly subjects. J Health Soc Behav 1973;14:87-93.
36. Winter L, Lawton MP, Langston CA et al. Symptoms, affects, and self-rated health: Evidence for a subjective trajectory of health. J Aging Health 2007;19:453-469. (Pubitemid 46743756)
37. Freedman VA, Martin LG, Schoeni RF. Recent trends in disability and functioning among older adults in the United States: A systematic review. JAMA 2002;288:3137-3146. (Pubitemid 36014131)
38. Schoeni RF, Freedman VA, Martin LG. Why is late-life disability declining? Milbank Q 2008;86:47-89.
39. Table 12. Projections of the Population by Age and Sex for the United States: 2010 to 2050 (NP2008-T12) [on-line]. Available at http://wwew.cnsus.gov/ population/www/projections/summarytables.htm Accessed June 14, 2010.
40. Boult C, Christmas C, Durso SC et al. Perspective: Transforming chronic care for older persons. Acad Med 2008;83:627-631.
41. US Department ofHealth and Human Services.Office of Disease prevention& Health Promotion, Healthy people 2020 proposed objectives [on-line]. October 30, 2009; Available at http://www.healthypeople.gov/hp2020/ objectives/TopicArea.aspx?id=17&TopicArea= Disability+and+Secondary+Conditions Accessed March 23, 2010.
42. Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Dynamic Tools to Measure Health from the Patient Perspective [on-line]. Available at http://www.nihpromis.org/default.aspx Accessed January 15, 2010.
43. Todorov A, Kirchner C. Bias in proxies' reports of disability: Data from the National Health Interview Survey on disability. Am J Public Health 2000;90:1248-1253. (Pubitemid 30497378)
44. Chen MH, Hsieh CL, Mao HF et al. Differences between patient and proxy reports in the assessment of disability after stroke. Clin Rehabil 2007;21:351-356.
45. Dorevitch MI, Cossar RM, Bailey FJ et al. The accuracy of self and informant ratings of physical functional capacity in the elderly. J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45:791-798.
46. Rothman ML, Hedrick SC, Bulcroft KA et al. The validity of proxy-generated scores as measures of patient health status. Med Care 1991;29:115-124.
47. Stineman MG, Ross RN, Maislin G et al. Estimating health-related quality of life in populations through cross-sectional surveys. Med Care 2004;42:569-578.
48. US Department of Health & Human Services. Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) [on-line]. Available at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/MCBS/ Accessed March 26, 2010.