Predicting the Achievement of 6 Grades of Physical Independence from Data Routinely Collected at Admission to Rehabilitation

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 84, Issue 11, 2003, Pages 1647-1656

  Stineman, Margaret G ^a,c   Ross, Richard N ^a   Granger, Carl V ^b   Maislin, Greg ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^c 101 Ralston Penn Center ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Prognosis; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DISABILITY; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; INSTRUMENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

EID: 0242551184     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/S0003-9993(03)00317-4     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Keith RA, Zielezny M, Sherwin ES. Advances in functional assessment for medical rehabilitation. Top Geriatr Rehabil 1986;1(3):59-74
2. Guide for the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation (including the FIM instrument), version 5. Buffalo: State Univ of New York; 1996.
3. Hamilton BB, Granger CV, Sherwin FS, Zielezny M, Tashman JS. A uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation. In: Fuhrer M, editor. Rehabilitation outcomes: analysis and measurement. Baltimore: Brookes; 1987. p 137-47.
4. Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD, Granger CV, Hamilton BB. The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:127-32.
5. Stineman M, Shea J, Jette A, et al. The Functional Independence Measure: tests of scaling assumptions, structure, and reliability across 20 diverse impairment categories. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:1101-8.
6. Stineman MG, Jette A, Fiedler RC, Granger CV. Impairment-specific dimensions within the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;78:636-43.
7. Fischer D, Stewart AL, Bloch DA, Lorig K, Laurent D, Holman H. Capturing the patient's view of change as a clinical outcome measure. JAMA 1999;282:1157-62.
8. Stineman MG, Ross RG, Fiedler R, Granger CV, Maislin G. Functional independence staging: conceptual foundation, face validity, and empirical derivation, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:29-37.
9. Stineman MG, Ross RG, Fiedler R, Granger CV, Maislin G. Staging functional independence: validity and applications. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:38-45.
10. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged: the Index of ADL, a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA 1963;185:914-9.
11. Cifu CL, Stewart DG. Factors affecting functional outcome after stroke. A critical review of rehabilitation interventions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80(5 Suppl 1):S35-9.
12. Harada N, Sofaer S, Kominski G. Functional status outcomes in rehabilitation. Implications for prospective payment. Med Care 1993;31:345-57.
13. Macciocchi SN, Diamond PT, Alves WM, Mertz T. Ischemic stroke: relation of age, lesion location, and initial neurologic deficit to functional outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:1255-7.
14. McKinley WO, Seel RT, Hardman JT. Nontraumatic spinal cord injury: incidence, epidemiology and functional outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:619-23.
15. O'Donnell JC, Hamilton BB. Stroke rehabilitation management in the Department of Veterans Affairs: impact of patient referral source on outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;78:929-37.
16. Stineman MG, Maislin G, Fiedler RC, Granger CV. A prediction model for functional recovery in stroke. Stroke 1997;28:550-6.
17. World Health Organization. 1CIDH-2: international classification of functioning and disability - a manual of dimensions of disablement and functioning. Beta-2 draft. Geneva: WHO; 1999.
18. World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
19. Hamilton BB, Laughlin JA, Fiedler RC, Granger CV. Interrater reliability of the 7-level Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Scand J Rehabil 1994;26:115-9.
20. Stineman MG. Defining the population, treatments, and outcomes of interest. Reconciling the rules of biology with meaningfulness. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001;80:147-59.
21. Carmines EG, Zeller RA. Reliability and validity assessment. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. No. 07-917. Newbury Park (CA): Sage Publications; 1979.
22. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1989.
23. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Morgenstern H. Epidemiologic research: principles and quantitative methods, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1982.
24. Harrell FE, Lee KL, Mark DB. Tutorial in biostatistics: issues developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 1996;15:361-87.
25. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). Radiology 1982;143:29-36.
26. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, Mackenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373-83.
27. Gonnella JS, Hornbrook MC, Louis DZ. Staging of disease: a case-mix measurement. JAMA 1984;251:637-44.
28. Hannan EL, Kilbum H, Bernard H, O'Donnell JF, Lukacik G, Shields EP. Coronary artery bypass surgery: the relationship between inhospital mortality rate and surgical volume after controlling for clinical risk factors. Med Care 1991;29:1094-107.
29. Horn SD, Chambers AF, Sharkey PD, Horn RA. Psychiatric severity of illness: a case mix study. Med Care 1989;27:69-84.
30. Horn SD, Horn RA. The computerized severity index. A new tool for case-mix management. J Med Syst 1986;10:73-8.
31. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985;13:818-29.
32. Stineman MG, Granger CV. Outcome, efficiency, and time-trend analysis for stroke rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1998;77:192-201.
33. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Report to the Congress: applying quality improvement standards in Medicare. Washington (DC): MedPAC; Jan 2002.
34. US Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. 42 CFR Parts 412 and 413. Medicare program; prospective payment system for inpatient rehabilitation facilities; final rule. 66 Fed Regist 41315 (2001).
35. Davis RB, Iezzoni LI, Phillips RS, Reiley P, Coffman GA, Safran C. Predicting in-hospital mortality. The importance of functional status information. Med Care 1995;33:906-21.
36. Inouye SK, Peduzzi PN, Robinson JT, Hughes JS, Horwitz RI, Concato J. Importance of functional measures in predicting mortality among older hospitalized patients. JAMA 1998;279:1187-93.
37. Tsuji I, Whalen S, Finucane TE. Predictors of nursing home placement in community-based long-term care. J Am Geriatr Soc 1995;43:761-6.
38. Weissert WG, Cready CM. Toward a model for improved targeting of aged at risk of institutionalization. Health Serv Res 1989;24:485-510.
39. Winograd CH, Gerety MB, Chung M, Goldstein MA, Dominguez F, Vallone R. Screening for frailty: criteria and predictors of outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991;39:778-84.
40. US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2010. Washington (DC): US Department of Health and Human Services; 2000.
41. Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med 1993;118:622-9.
42. Stineman MG. A model of health environmental integration. Top Stroke Rehabil 2001;8(2):34-45.
43. Brandt EN, Pope AM, editors. Enabling America: assessing the role of rehabilitation science and engineering. Washington (DC): Natl Acad Pr; 1997.
44. Heinemann AW, Linacre JM, Wright BD, Hamilton BB, Granger CV. Prediction of rehabilitation outcomes with disability measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:133-43.
45. Stineman MG, Goin JE, Granger CV, Fiedler RC, Williams SV. Discharge motor FIM-function related groups. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;78:980-5.
46. Glass TA, De Leon CM, Marottoli RA, Berkman LF. Population based study of social and productive activities as predictors of survival among elderly Americans, BMJ 1999;319:478-83.
47. Pomeroy VM, Tallis RC. Need to focus research in stroke rehabilitation. Lancet 2000:355:836-7.