The Biopsycho-ecological Paradigm: A Foundational Theory for Medicine

PM and R

Volumn 2, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1035-1045

  Stineman, Margaret Grace ^a   Streim, Joel E ^b  

^a Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOPSYCHOECOLOGICAL PARADIGM; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DISABILITY; HUMAN; INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH; PHYSICAL MEDICINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOSOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; PSYCHOSOCIAL REHABILITATION; REVIEW; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISABLED PERSONS; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MIND-BODY RELATIONS, METAPHYSICAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PHYSICAL MEDICINE; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

EID: 78549254146     PISSN: 19341482     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.06.013     Document Type: Review

References (95)

1. De Vreese L. Causal (mis)understanding and the search for scientific explanations: A case study from the history of medicine. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 2008, 39:14-24.
2. Gradmann C. A matter of methods: The historicity of Koch's postulates 1840-2000 [in German]. Medizinhist J 2008, 43:121-148.
3. Hewa S., Hetherington R.W. Specialists without spirit: Limitations of the mechanistic biomedical model. Theor Med 1995, 16:129-139.
4. Weiner B.K. Difficult medical problems: On explanatory models and a pragmatic alternative. Med Hypotheses 2007, 68:474-479.
5. A century of public health: From fluoridation to food safety: CDC celebrates Public Health Week Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Accessed December 31, 2009. http://www.cdc.gov/media/pressrel/a990401.htm.
6. Engel G.L. The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science 1977, 196:129-136.
7. McEwen B.S. Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators. N Engl J Med 1998, 338:171-179.
8. Ryff C.D., Singer B. Psychological well-being: Meaning, measurement, and implications for psychotherapy research. Psychother Psychosom 1996, 65:14-23.
9. Fava G.A., Sonino N. The biopsychosocial model thirty years later. Psychother Psychosom 2008, 77:1-2.
10. Stineman M.G. The spheres of self fulfillment. Designing and Using Assistive Technology: A Human Perspective 1998, 51-74. Paul H. Brooks, Baltimore, MD. D.B. Gray, L.A. Quatrano, M.L. Lieberman (Eds.).
11. Stineman M., Strasser D. Team process and effectiveness: Patients, families and staff. Topic Stroke Rehabil 1977, 4:21-33.
12. Guarini G. The application of the theory of systems in internal medicine. State of the art and perspectives. Ann Ital Med Int 1991, 6:156-161.
13. Sudakov K.V. The theory of functional systems: General postulates and principles of dynamic organization (dedicated to the Anokhin Centenary). Integr Physiol Behav Sci 1997, 32:392-414.
14. Stineman G., Ross R., Maislin G., Gray D. Population-based study of home accessibility features and the activities of daily living: Clinical and policy implications. Disabil Rehabil 2007, 29:1165-1175.
15. Stineman M.G. A model of health environmental integration. Top Stroke Rehabil 2001, 8:34-45.
16. Stineman M.G., Ross R.N., Maislin G., Marchuk N., Hijirida S., Weiner M.G. Recovery preference exploration: Analysis of patient feedback after imagined scenarios. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2007, 86:272-281.
17. Granger C.V., Hamilton B.B., Keith R.A., Zielezny M., Sherwin F. Advances in functional assessment for medical rehabilitation. Top Geriatr Rehabil 1986, 1:59-74.
18. Stineman M.G., Ross R.N., Fiedler R., Granger C.V., Maislin G. Staging functional independence validity and applications. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003, 84:38-45.
19. Stineman M.G. Defining the population, treatments, and outcomes of interest: Reconciling the rules of biology with meaningfulness. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001, 80:147-159.
20. A Dictionary of Public Health. "Theory." Accessed May 2, 2010. http://www.oxfordreference.com/views/ENTRY.html?subview=Main%26entry=t235.e4432.
21. Verville R.E., Thomas P.W. A new era in health care: Opportunities and challenges. PM R 2009, 1:511-515.
22. Kirschner K.L., Breslin M.L., Iezzoni L.I., Sandel E. Attending to inclusion: People with disabilities and health-care reform. PM R 2009, 1:957-963.
23. Stineman M., Rist P., Kurichi J., Maislin G. Disability meanings according to patients & clinicians imagined recovery choice pathway. Qual Life Res 2009, 18:389-398.
24. Astin J.A., Sierpina V.S., Forys K., Clarridge B. Integration of the biopsychosocial model: Perspectives of medical students and residents. Acad Med 2008, 83:20-27.
25. Avlund K., Lund R., Holstein B.E., Due P. Social relations as determinant of onset of disability in aging. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2003, 38:85-99.
26. Bakal D., Steiert M., Coll P., Schaefer J. An experiential mind-body approach to the management of medically unexplained symptoms. Med Hypotheses 2006, 67:1443-1447.
27. Braun J.V., Wykle M.H., Cowling W.R. Failure to thrive in older persons: A concept derived. Gerontologist 1988, 28:809-812.
28. Cohen D.A., Inagami S., Finch B. The built environment and collective efficacy. Health Place 2008, 14:198-208.
29. Comfort A. Reality and Empathy: Physics, Mind, and Science in the 21st Century 1984, State University of New York Press Albany, Albany, NY.
30. DeJong G. Independent living: from social movement to analytic paradigm. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1979, 60:435-446.
31. Denman A.M., Rager-Zisman B. Viruses and autoimmune diseases-adapting Koch's postulates. Autoimmun Rev 2004, 3:355-361.
32. Ebers G.C. Environmental factors and multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 2008, 7:268-277.
33. Fougeyrollas P.C.R., Cloutier H., Bergeron J., Cote G. The Quebec classification: Disability creation process 1998, NDCP/CSICIDH, Lac St-Charles, Quebec.
34. Freedman A.M. The biopsychosocial paradigm and the future of psychiatry. Compr Psychiatry 1995, 36:397-406.
35. Fried L.P., Ferrucci L., Darer J., Williamson J.D., Anderson G. Untangling the concepts of disability, frailty, and comorbidity: Implications for improved targeting and care. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2004, 59:255-263.
36. Fries J.F. Successful aging-an emerging paradigm of gerontology. Clin Geriatr Med 2002, 18:371-382.
37. Giorgi A. The phenomenological movement and research in the human sciences. Nurs Sci Q 2005, 18:75-82.
38. Gradmann C. Robert Koch and tuberculosis: The beginning of medical bacteriology [in German]. Pneumologie 2009, 63:702-708.
39. Hu P., Wagle N., Goldman N., Weinstein M., Seeman T.E. The associations between socioeconomic status, allostatic load and measures of health in older Taiwanese persons: Taiwan social environment and biomarkers of aging study. J Biosoc Sci 2007, 39:545-556.
40. Jackson R.J. The impact of the built environment on health: An emerging field. Am J Public Health 2003, 93:1382-1384.
41. Jette A.M., Norweg A., Haley S.M. Achieving meaningful measurements of ICF concepts. Disabil Rehabil 2008, 30:963-969.
42. Lichtenberg P.A., MacNeill S.E., Mast B.T. Environmental press and adaptation to disability in hospitalized live-alone older adults. Gerontologist 2000, 40:549-556.
43. Northridge M.E., Sclar E.D., Biswas P. Sorting out the connections between the built environment and health: A conceptual framework for navigating pathways and planning healthy cities. J Urban Health 2003, 80:556-568.
44. Nosek M.A. Women with disabilities and the delivery of empowerment medicine. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997, 78(suppl 5):S1-S2.
45. Perdue W.C., Gostin L.O., Stone L.A. Public health and the built environment: Historical, empirical, and theoretical foundations for an expanded role. J Law Med Ethics 2003, 31:557-566.
46. Saleebey D. Human Behavior and Social Environments: A Biopsychosocial Approach 2001, Columbia University Press, New York, Chapter 4.
47. Stineman M.G. Medical humanism and empowerment in medicine. Disabil Studies Q 2000, 20:11-16.
48. Whyte J., Hart T. It's more than a black box; it's a Russian doll: Defining rehabilitation treatments. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003, 82:639-652.
49. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF 2001, World Health Organization, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
50. Qualitative methods in health research: Opportunities and considerations in application and review, organized by the NIH Culture and Qualitative Research Interest Group National Institutes of Health Office of Behavioral and Social Science Research, Accessed October 18, 2004. http://obssr.od.nih.gov/Documents/Publications/Qualitative.PDF.
51. Kopec K.A. Concepts of disability: The activity space model. Soc Sci Med 1995, 40:649-656.
52. Frumkin H. Healthy places: Exploring the evidence. Am J Public Health 2003, 93:1451-1456.
53. Galea S., Ahern J., Rudenstine S., Wallace Z., Vlahov D. Urban built environment and depression: A multilevel analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health 2005, 59:822-827.
54. Gordon-Larsen P., Nelson M.C., Page P., Popkin B.M. Inequality in the built environment underlies key health disparities in physical activity and obesity. Pediatrics 2006, 117:417-424.
55. Hood E. Dwelling disparities: How poor housing leads to poor health. Environ Health Perspect 2005, 113:A310-A317.
56. Kochtitzky C.S., Frumkin H., Rodriguez R., et al. Urban planning and public health at CDC. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2006, 55(suppl 2):34-38.
57. Leyden K.M. Social capital and the built environment: The importance of walkable neighborhoods. Am J Public Health 2003, 93:1546-1551.
58. Rao M., Prasad S., Adshead F., Tissera H. The built environment and health [see comment]. Lancet 2008, 371(9609):302.
59. Retting R.A., Ferguson S.A., McCartt A.T. A review of evidence-based traffic engineering measures designed to reduce pedestrian-motor vehicle crashes. Am J Public Health 2003, 93:1456-1463.
60. Rosenthal J.K., Sclar E.D., Kinney P.L., Knowlton K., Crauderueff R., Brandt-Rauf P.W. Links between the built environment, climate and population health: Interdisciplinary environmental change research in New York City. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2007, 36:834-846.
61. Keysor J.J., Jette A.M., Lavalley M.P., et al. Community environmental factors are associated with disability in older adults with functional limitations: The MOST Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2009.
62. Shumway-Cook A., Patla A., Stewart A., Ferrucci L., Ciol M.A., Guralnik J.M. Environmental components of mobility disability in community-living older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 2003, 51:393-398.
63. Stineman M.G., Qu W. Untangling function: Measuring the severity, type and meaning of disabilities. Eura Medicophys 2007, 43:543-549.
64. Joyce C.R., Hickey A., McGee H.M., O'Boyle C.A. A theory-based method for the evaluation of individual quality of life: The SEIQoL. Qual Life Res 2003, 12:275-280.
65. Manchikanti L., Derby R., Wolfer L., Singh V., Datta S., Hirsch J.A. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: Part 7: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy studies. Pain Physician 2009, 12:929-963.
66. Chung K.C., Shauver M.J. Crafting practice guidelines in the world of evidence-based medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009, 124:1349-1354.
67. Withers R. Descartes' dreams. J Anal Psychol 2008, 53:691-709.
68. Porcelli P., Todarello O. Psychological factors affecting functional gastrointestinal disorders. Adv Psychosom Med 2007, 28:34-56.
69. Hayes A.M. Dynamic systems theory as a paradigm for the study of change in psychotherapy: An application to cognitive therapy for depression. J Consult Clin Psychol 1998, 66:939-947. JL. S.
70. Garcia-Toro M., Aguirre I. Biopsychosocial model in depression revisited. Med Hypotheses 2007, 68:683-691.
71. Kable J.W., Glimcher P.W. The neurobiology of decision: consensus and controversy. Neuron 2009, 63:733-745.
72. Chow J.Y., Davids K., Button C., Rein R., Hristovski R., Koh M. Dynamics of multi-articular coordination in neurobiological systems. Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci 2009, 13:27-55.
73. Kim H.K., Park S., Srinivasan M.A. Developments in brain-machine interfaces from the perspective of robotics. Hum Mov Sci 2009, 28:191-203.
74. Stineman M.G., Jette A., Fiedler R., Granger C. Impairment-specific dimensions within the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997, 78:636-643.
75. Katz S., Ford A.B., Moskowitz R.W., Jackson B.A., Jaffe M.W. Studies of illness in the aged. The index of ADL: A standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA 1963, 185:914-919.
76. Reisberg B., Franssen E.H., Hasan S.M., et al. Retrogenesis: Clinical, physiologic, and pathologic mechanisms in brain aging, Alzheimer's and other dementing processes. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 1999, 249(suppl 3):28-36.
77. Stineman M.G., Ross R.N., Fiedler R., Granger C.V., Maislin G. Functional independence staging: Conceptual foundation, face validity, and empirical derivation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003, 84:29-37.
78. Tao W., Haley S.M., Coster W.J., Ni P., Jette A.M. An exploratory analysis of functional staging using an item response theory approach. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008, 89:1046-1053.
79. Goering S. Revisiting the relevance of the social model of disability. Am J Bioeth 10:54-55.
80. Hofkamp S.E., Henrikson C.A., Wegener S.T. An interactive model of pain and myocardial ischemia. Psychosom Med 2007, 69:632-639.
81. Raichle K.A., Hanley M., Jensen M.P., Cardenas D.D. Cognitions, coping, and social environment predict adjustment to pain in spinal cord injury. J Pain 2007, 8:718-729.
82. Wilz G., Barskova T. Predictors of psychological and somatic components of poststroke depression: A longitudinal study. Top Stroke Rehabil 2007, 14:25-40.
83. May D., Nayak U.S., Isaacs B. The life-space diary: a measure of mobility in old people at home. Int Rehabil Med 1985, 7:182-186.
84. Jette A.M., Haley S.M., Ni P., Olarsch S., Moed R. Creating a computer adaptive test version of the late-life function and disability instrument. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2008, 63:1246-1256.
85. Linacre J.M., Heinemann A.W., Wright B.D., Granger C.V., Hamilton B.B. The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994, 75:127-132.
86. Stineman M.G. A model of health environmental integration. Top Stroke Rehabil 2001, 8:34-45.
87. Stineman M.G., Ross R.N., Maislin G., Marchuk N., Hijirida S., Weiner M. Recovery preference exploration. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2007, 86:272-281.
88. Kurz A.E., Saint-Louis N., Burke J.P., Stineman M.G. Exploring the personal reality of disability and recovery: A tool for empowering the rehabilitation process. Qual Health Res 2008, 18:90-105.
89. Stineman M.G., Maislin G., Nosek M., Fiedler R., Granger C.V. Comparing consumer and clinician values for alternative functional states: Application of a new feature trade-off consensus building tool. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998, 79:1522-1529.
90. Rist P.M., Freas D.W., Maislin G., Stineman M.G. Recovery from disablement: What functional abilities do rehabilitation professionals value the most?. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008, 89:1600-1606.
91. Mukherjee D., Brashler R., Savage T.A., Kirschner K.L. Moral distress in rehabilitation professionals: Results from a hospital ethics survey. PM R 2009, 1:450-458.
92. Hughes M.D. The holistic way: John Wesley's practical piety as a resource for integrated healthcare. J Relig Health 2008, 47:237-252.
93. Siebens H. The domain management model-a tool for teaching and management of older adults in emergency departments. Acad Emerg Med 2005, 12:162-168.
94. FY 2010 IRF PPS Final Rule. 74 Fed Reg 2010;39762:39788-39788.
95. New coverage policies for inpatient rehabilitation services November 2009, Department of Human Services, CMS Medicare Learning Network, Washington, DC.