Differences between patient and proxy reports in the assessment of disability after stroke

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 351-356

  Chen, Mei Hsiang ^a   Hsieh, Ching Lin ^b   Mao, Hui Fen ^b   Huang, Sheau Ling ^b  

^a CHUNG SHAN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BARTHEL INDEX; CAREGIVER; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABILITY; FEMALE; FRENCHAY ACTIVITIES INDEX; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SELF REPORT; STUDENT T TEST;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; CAREGIVERS; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROXY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SELF ASSESSMENT (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 34447523514     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0269215507072544     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. McHorney CA. Use of item response theory to link 3 modules of functional status items from the asset and health dynamics among the oldest old study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 383-94.
2. Duncan PW, Jorgensen HS, Wade DT. Outcome measures in acute stroke trials: A systematic review and some recommendations to improve practice. Stroke 2000; 31: 1429-38.
3. Sinoff G, Ore L. The barthel activities of daily living index: Self-reporting versus actual performance in the old-old (> or = 75 years). J Am Geriatr Soc 1997; 45: 832-36.
4. Rubenstein LZ, Schairer C, Wieland GD, Kane R. Systematic biases in functional status assessment of elderly adults: Effects of different data sources. J Gerontol 1984; 39: 686-91.
5. Ostbye T, Tyas S, McDowell I, Koval J. Reported activities of daily living: Agreement between elderly subjects with and without dementia and their caregivers. Age Ageing 1997; 26: 99-106.
6. Wyller TB, Sveen U, Bautz-Holter E. The Frenchay Activities Index in stroke patients: Agreement between scores by patients and by relatives. Disabil Rehabil 1996; 18: 454-59.
7. Tooth LR, McKenna KT, Smith M, O'Rourke P. Further evidence for the agreement between patients with stroke and their proxies on the frenchay activities index. Clin Rehabil 2003; 17: 656-65.
8. Dorman PJ, Waddell F, Slattery J, Dennis M, Sandercock P. Are proxy assessments of health status after stroke with the Euroqol questionnaire feasible, accurate, and unbiased? Stroke 1997; 28: 1883-87.
9. Knapp P, Hewison J. Disagreement in patient and caret assessment of functional abilities after stroke. Stroke 1999; 30: 934-38.
10. Segal ME, Schall RR. Determining functional/health status and its relation to disability in stroke survivors. Stroke 1994; 25: 2391-97.
11. Siemiatycki J. A comparison of mail, telephone, and home interview strategies for household health surveys. Am J Public Health 1979; 69: 238-45.
12. Hachisuka K, Ogata H, Ohkuma H, Tanaka S, Dozono K. Test-retest and inter-method reliability of the self-rating barthel index. Clin Rehabil 1997; 11: 28-35.
13. Wade D. Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. Oxford University Press, 1992.
14. Hsueh IP, Lee MM, Hsieh CL. Psychometric characteristics of the barthel activities of daily living index in stroke patients. J Formos Med Assoc 2001; 100: 526-32.
15. Hsueh IP, Lin JH, Jeng JS, Hsieh CL. Comparison of the psychometric characteristics of the functional independence measure, 5 item barthel index, and 10 item Barthel Index in patients with stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 73: 188-90.
16. Holbrook M, Skilbeck CE. An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age Ageing 1983; 12: 166-70.
17. Wade DT, Leigh-Smith J, Langton Hewer R. Social activities after stroke: Measurement and natural history using the frenchay activities index. Int Rehabil Med 1985; 7: 176-81.
18. Carter J, Mant F, Mant J, Wade D, Winner S. Comparison of postal version of the frenchay activities index with interviewer-administered version for use in people with stroke. Clin Rehabil 1997; 11: 131-38.
19. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975; 7: 13-31.
20. Duncan PW, Propst M, Nelson SG. Reliability of the fugl-meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. Phys Ther 1983; 63: 1606-10.
21. Lezak M. Neuropsychological assessment. Oxford University Press, 1995.
22. Nelson A, Fogel BS, Faust D. Bedside cognitive screening instruments. A critical assessment. J Nerv Ment Dis 1986; 174: 73-83.
23. Wyller TB, Sveen U, Bautz-Holter E. The barthel adl index one year after stroke: Comparison between relatives' and occupational therapist's scores. Age Ageing 1995; 24: 398-401.
24. Zanetti O, Geroldi C, Frisoni GB, Bianchetti A, Trabucchi M. Contrasting results between caregiver's report and direct assessment of activities of daily living in patients affected by mild and very mild dementia: The contribution of the caregiver's personal characteristics. J Am Geriatr Soc 1999; 47: 196-202.