Confronting the Dilemma of Mixed Methods

Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 44-60

  Wiggins, Bradford J ^a  

^a BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Incompatibility; Mixed methods research; Philosophy of science; Pluralism

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952464317     PISSN: 10688471     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0022612     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. Aluko F.S. Social science research: A critique of quantitative and qualitative methods and proposal for an eclectic approach. IFE Psychologia: An International Journal 2006, 14:198-210. Retrieved from http://ajol.info/index.php/ifep/index.
2. Evidence-based practice in psychology. American Psychologist 2006, 61:271-285. American Psychological Association Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice, doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.4.271.
3. Annells M. Triangulation of qualitative approaches: Hermeneutical phenomenology and grounded theory. JAN Journal of Advanced Nursing 2006, 56:55-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03979.x.
4. Barbour R.S. The newfound credibility of qualitative research? Tales of technical essentialism and co-option. Qualitative Health Research 2003, 13:1019-1027. doi: 10.1177/1049732303253331.
5. Barrett P. Beyond psychometrics: Measurement, non-quantitative structure, and applied numerics. Journal of Managerial Psychology 2003, 18:421-439. doi: 10.1108/02683940310484026.
6. Bednarz D. Quantity and quality in evaluation research: A divergent view. Evaluation and Program Planning 1985, 8:289-306. doi: 10.1016/0149-7189(85)90024-2.
7. Bishop R. The philosophy of the social sciences: An introduction 2007, Continuum, London, England.
8. Brannen J. Mixing methods: The entry of qualitative and quantitative approaches into the research process. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory & Practice 2005, 8:173-184. doi: 10.1080/13645570500154642.
9. Bryman A. The debate about quantitative and qualitative research: A question of method or epistemology?. British Journal of Sociology 1984, 35:75. doi: 10.2307/590553.
10. Bryman A. Triangulation. The Sage encyclopedia of social science research methods 2003, 3. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. M.S. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman, T.F. Liao (Eds.).
11. Bryman A. Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done?. Qualitative Research 2006, 6:97-113. doi: 10.1177/1468794106058877.
12. Buchanan D.R. An uneasy alliance: Combining qualitative and quantitative research methods. Health Education Quarterly 1992, 19:117-135. doi: 10.1177/109019819201900108.
13. Carey J.W. Linking qualitative and quantitative methods: Integrating cultural factors into public health. Qualitative Health Research 1993, 3:298-318. doi: 10.1177/104973239300300303.
14. Creswell J.W., Plano Clark V.L. Designing and conducting mixed methods research 2007, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
15. Curlette W.L. A framework for research studies: Mixed methods through combining Bayesian statistics and qualitative research in individual psychology. Journal of Individual Psychology 2006, 62:338-349. Retrieved from http://www.utexas.edu/utpress/journals/jip.html.
16. Danziger K. The methodological imperative in psychology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 1985, 15:1-13. doi: 10.1177/004839318501500101.
17. Dawson T.L., Fischer K.W., Stein Z. Reconsidering qualitative and quantitative research approaches: A cognitive developmental perspective. New Ideas in Psychology 2006, 24:229-239. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2006.10.001.
18. Denzin N.K., Lincoln Y.S. Handbook of qualitative research 1994, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
19. de Vries H., Weijts W., Dijkstra M., Kok G. The utilization of qualitative and quantitative data for health education program planning, implementation, and evaluation: A spiral approach. Health Education Quarterly 1992, 19:101-115. doi: 10.1177/109019819201900107.
20. DeWitt R. Worldviews: An introduction to the history and philosophy of science 2009, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, England. 2nd ed.
21. Dixon-Woods M., Agarwal S., Young B., Jones D., Sutton A. Integrative approaches to qualitative and quantitative evidence 2004, Health Development Agency, London, Retrieved from https://www.nice.org.uk/niceMedia/pdf/Integrative_approaches_evidence.pdf.
22. Dixon-Woods M., Bonas S., Booth A., Jones D.R., Miller T., Sutton A.J., Young B. How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Qualitative Research 2006, 6:27-44. doi: 10.1177/1468794106058867.
23. Dzurec L.C., Abraham I.L. The nature of inquiry: Linking quantitative and qualitative research. Advances in Nursing Science 1993, 16:73-79. Retrieved from http://journals.lww.com/advancesinnursingscience/pp./default.aspx.
24. Feyerabend P. Against method 1993, Verso, London, England. 3rd ed.
25. Forshaw M.J. Free qualitative research from the shackles of method. The Psychologist 2007, 20:478-479. Retrieved from http://www.thepsychologist.org.uk/thepsychologist_home.cfm.
26. Gadamer, H. G. (2004). Truth and method (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans. 2nd, rev. Ed.). London, England: Continuum.
27. Gage N.L. The paradigm wars and their aftermath: A " historical" sketch of research on teaching since 1989. Educational Researcher 1989, 18(7):4-10. doi: 10.3102/0013189X018007004.
28. Giddings L.S., Grant B.M. Mixed methods research for the novice researcher. Contemporary Nurse 2006, 23:3-11. Retrieved from http://www.contemporarynurse.com/.
29. Greene J.C., Benjamin L., Goodyear L. The merits of mixing methods in evaluation. Evaluation: The International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice 2001, 7:25-44. doi: 10.1177/13563890122209504.
30. Guba E.G., Lincoln Y.S. Do inquiry paradigms imply inquiry methodologies?. Qualitative approaches to evaluation in education: The silent scientific revolution 1988, 89-115. Praeger, New York, NY. D.M. Fetterman (Ed.).
31. Gürtler L., Huber G.L. The ambiguous use of language in the paradigms of QUAN and QUAL. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2006, 3:313-328. doi: 10.1177/1478088706070840.
32. Haight W.L. Integrating 'quanta' and 'qualia' in the study of human development. PsycCRITIQUES 1997, 42(11):1029-1030. doi: 10.1037/001411.
33. Hammersley M. The relationship between qualitative and quantitative research: Paradigm loyalty versus methodological eclecticism. Handbook of qualitative research methods for psychology and the social sciences 1996, 159-174. BPS Blackwell, Oxford, England. J.T.E. Richardson (Ed.).
34. Hanson W.E., Creswell J.W., Plano Clark V.L., Petska K.S., Creswell J.D. Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology 2005, 52:224-235. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.224.
35. Harden A., Thomas J. Methodological issues in combining diverse study types in systematic reviews. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory & Practice 2005, 8:257-271. doi: 10.1080/13645570500155078.
36. Hayward P., Peck E., Smith H. Qualitative and quantitative approaches to needs assessment in mental health: Creating a common currency. Journal of Mental Health 1993, 2:287-294. doi: 10.3109/09638239309016963.
37. Henderson K.A., Bedini L.A. Notes on linking qualitative and quantitative data. Therapeutic Recreation Journal 1995, 29:124-130. doi: 10.1080/014904099273138.
38. Hill C.E., Lambert M.J. Methodological issues in studying psychotherapy processes and outcomes. Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change 2004, 84-135. Wiley, New York, NY. 5th ed. M.J. Lambert (Ed.).
39. Hoshmand L.T. Alternate research paradigms: A review and teaching proposal. The Counseling Psychologist 1989, 17:3-79. doi: 10.1177/0011000089171001.
40. Hoshmand L.T., Polkinghorne D. Redefining the science-practice relationship and professional training. American Psychologist 1992, 47:55. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.47.1.55.
41. Howe K.R. Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatibility thesis or dogmas die hard. Educational Researcher 1988, 17:10. doi: 10.3102/0013189X017008010.
42. Howe K.R. Getting over the quantitative-qualitative debate. American Journal of Education 1992, 100:236-256. doi: 10.1086/444015.
43. Johnson B., Turner L.A. Data collection strategies in mixed methods research. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral sciences 2003, 297-319. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. A. Tashakkori, C. Teddlie (Eds.).
44. Johnstone P.L. Mixed methods, mixed methodology health services research in practice. Qualitative Health Research 2004, 14:259-271. doi: 10.1177/1049732303260610.
45. Kazdin A.E. Research design in clinical psychology 2003, Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA. 4th ed.
46. Kelle U. Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in research practice: Purposes and advantages. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2006, 3:293-311. doi: 10.1177/1478088706070839.
47. Kelley K.N. A textbook case for mixing methods. PsycCRITIQUES 2007, 52(10). doi: 10.1037/a0006641.
48. Kuhn T.S. The structure of scientific revolutions 1962, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
49. Lambert M.J., Garfield S.L., Bergin A.E. Overview, trends, and future issues. Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change 2004, 805-821. Wiley, New York, NY. 5th ed. M.J. Lambert (Ed.).
50. Looker E.D., Denton M.A., Davis C.K. Bridging the gap: Incorporating qualitative data into quantitative analyses. Social Science Research 1989, 18:313-330. doi: 10.1016/0049-089X(89)90011-2.
51. Lund T. The qualitative-quantitative distinction: Some comments. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 2005, 49:115-132. doi: 10.1080/00313830500048790.
52. Mason J. Mixing methods in a qualitatively driven way. Qualitative Research 2006, 6:9-25. doi: 10.1177/1468794106058866.
53. Mays N., Pope C. Qualitative research: Rigour and qualitative research. British Medical Journal 1995, 311(6997):109-112.
54. McGrath J.E., Johnson B.A. Methodology makes meaning: How both qualitative and quantitative paradigms shape evidence and its interpretation. Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design 2003, 31. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. P.M. Camic, J.E. Rhodes, L. Yardley (Eds.).
55. McKeganey N. Quantitative and qualitative research in the addictions: An unhelpful divide. Addiction 1995, 90:749-751. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1995.tb02214.x.
56. Michell J. The quantitative imperative: Positivism, naive realism and the place of qualitative methods in psychology. Theory & Psychology 2003, 13:5-31. doi: 10.1177/0959354303013001758.
57. Morgan D.L. Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: Applications to health research. Qualitative Health Research 1998, 8:362-376. doi: 10.1177/104973239800800307.
58. Morgan D.L. Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 2007, 1:48-76. doi: 10.1177/2345678906292462.
59. Morse J.M. Editorial: Qualitative research is not a modification of quantitative research. Qualitative Health Research 2005, 15:1003-1005. doi: 10.1177/1049732305280771.
60. Morse J.M., Niehaus L., Wolfe R.R., Wilkins S. The role of the theoretical drive in maintaining validity in mixed-method research. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2006, 3:279-291. doi: 10.1177/1478088706070837.
61. Ogborne A.C. Unhelpful divide but important distinction. Addiction 1995, 90:755-757. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1995.tb02216.x.
62. Onwuegbuzie A.J., DaRos-Voseles D.A. The role of cooperative learning in research methodology courses: A mixed-methods analysis. Research in the Schools 2001, 8:61-75. Retrieved from http://www.msera.org/rits.htm.
63. Onwuegbuzie A.J., Leech N.L. On becoming a pragmatic researcher: The importance of combining quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory & Practice 2005, 8:375-387. doi: 10.1080/13645570500402447.
64. Onwuegbuzie A.J., Leech N.L. Taking the 'Q' out of research: Teaching research methodology courses without the divide between quantitative and qualitative paradigms. Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology 2005, 39:267-296. doi: 10.1007/s11135-004-1670-0.
65. Payne G., Williams M., Chamberlain S. Methodological pluralism, British sociology and the evidence-based state: A reply to May. Sociology 2005, 39:529-533. doi: 10.1177/0038038505053107.
66. Perlesz A., Lindsay J. Methodological triangulation in researching families: Making sense of dissonant data. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory & Practice 2003, 6(1):25-40. doi: 10.1080/13645570305056.
67. Pernice R. Methodological issues in unemployment research: Quantitative and/or qualitative approaches?. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 1996, 69:339-349. Retrieved from http://www.bpsjournals.co.uk/journals/joop/.
68. Plewis I., Mason P. What works and why: Combining quantitative and qualitative approaches in large-scale evaluations. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory & Practice 2005, 8:185-194. doi: 10.1080/13645570500154659.
69. Polkinghorne D.E. Methodology for the human sciences: Systems of inquiry 1983, SUNY Press, Albany, NY.
70. Priola V., Smith J.L., Armstrong S.J. Group work and cognitive style: A discursive investigation. Small Group Research 2004, 35:565-595. doi: 10.1177/1046496404265143.
71. Richards P.S., Bergin A.E. A theistic, spiritual view of science and research methods 1997, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
72. Richards P.S., Bergin A.E. A theistic, spiritual view of science and research methods 2005, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
73. Sechrest L., Sidani S. Quantitative and qualitative methods: Is there an alternative?. Evaluation and Program Planning 1995, 18:77-87. doi: 10.1016/0149-7189(94)00051-X.
74. Shadish W.R. Philosophy of science and the quantitative-qualitative debates: Thirteen common errors. Evaluation and Program Planning 1995, 18:63-75. doi: 10.1016/0149-7189(94)00050-8.
75. Shadish W.R., Cook T.D., Campbell D.T. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference 2002, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.
76. Shah S.K., Corley K.G. Building better theory by bridging the quantitative-qualitative divide. Journal of Management Studies 2006, 43:1821-1835. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00662.x.
77. Shank G. Six alternatives to mixed methods in qualitative research. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2006, 3:346-356. doi: 10.1177/1478088706070842.
78. Simpson R.G., Eaves R.C. Do we need more qualitative research or more good research? A reaction to Stainback and Stainback. Exceptional Children 1985, 51:325-329. Retrieved from http://www.cec.sped.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Publications2/ExceptionalChildren/default.htm.
79. Slife B.D. Time and psychological explanation 1993, SUNY Press, Albany, NY.
80. Slife B.D. Are discourse communities incommensurable in a fragmented psychology? The possibility of disciplinary coherence. Journal of Mind & Behavior 2000, 21:261-272. Retrieved from http://www.umaine.edu/jmb/.
81. Slife B.D., Gantt E.E. Methodological pluralism: A framework for psychotherapy research. Journal of Clinical Psychology 1999, 55:1453. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199912)55:12::AID-JCLP43.0.CO;2-C.
82. Slife B.D., Williams R.N. What's behind the research? Discovering hidden assumptions in the behavioral sciences 1995, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
83. Spackman M.P., Williams R.N. The affiliation of methodology with ontology in a scientific psychology. The Journal of Mind and Behavior 2001, 22:389-406. Retrieved from http://www.umaine.edu/jmb/.
84. Stainback S., Stainback W. Quantitative and qualitative methodologies: Competitive or complementary? A response to Simpson and Eaves. Exceptional Children 1985, 51:330-334. Retrieved from http://www.cec.sped.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Publications2/ExceptionalChildren/default.htm.
85. Stam H.J. Pythagoreanism, meaning and the appeal to number. New Ideas in Psychology 2006, 24:240-251. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2006.10.002.
86. Stange K.C., Crabtree B.F., Miller W.L. Editorial: Publishing multimethod research. Annals of Family Medicine 2006, 4:292-294. doi: 10.1370/afm.615.
87. Steckler A., McLeroy K.R., Goodman R.M., Bird S.T. Toward integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: An introduction. Health Education Quarterly 1992, 19:1-8. doi: 10.1177/109019819201900101.
88. Stiles W.B. Numbers can be enriching. New Ideas in Psychology 2006, 24:252-262. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2006.10.003.
89. Sugarman J., Martin J. Toward an alternative psychology. Critical thinking about psychology: Hidden assumptions and plausible alternatives 2005, 251-266. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. B.D. Slife, J.S. Reber, F.C. Richardson (Eds.).
90. Tashakkori A., Teddlie C. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research 2003, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
91. Waller R., Gilbody S. Barriers to the uptake of computerized cognitive behavioural therapy: A systematic review of the quantitative and qualitative evidence. Psychological Medicine: A Journal of Research in Psychiatry and the Allied Sciences 2009, 39:705-712. doi: 10.1017/s0033291708004224.
92. Webb E.J. Unobtrusive measures: Nonreactive research in the social sciences 1966, Rand McNally, Chicago, IL.
93. Wendt D.C., Slife B.D. Is evidence-based practice diverse enough? Philosophy of science considerations. American Psychologist 2007, 62:613-614. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X62.6.613.
94. Wiggins B.J. William James and methodological pluralism: Bridging the qualitative and quantitative divide. Journal of Mind and Behavior 2009, 30:165-183. Retrieved from http://www.umaine.edu/jmb/.
95. Williams R.N. The language and methods of science: Common assumptions and uncommon conclusions. Critical thinking about psychology: Hidden assumptions and plausible alternatives 2005, 235-249. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. B.D. Slife, J.S. Reber, F.C. Richardson (Eds.).
96. Wittink M.N., Barg F.K., Gallo J.J. Unwritten rules of talking to doctors about depression: Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods. Annals of Family Medicine 2006, 4:302-309. doi: 10.1370/afm.558.
97. Yanchar S.C. William James and the challenge of methodological pluralism. Journal of Mind and Behavior 1997, 18:425-442. Retrieved from http://www.umaine.edu/jmb/.
98. Yanchar S.C., Williams D.D. Reconsidering the compatibility thesis and eclecticism: Five proposed guidelines for method use. Educational Researcher 2006, 35(9):3. doi: 10.3102/0013189X035009003.