Six alternatives to mixed methods in qualitative research

Qualitative Research in Psychology

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 346-356

  Shank, Gary ^a,b  

^a Daquesne University   (United States)

^b DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Abductive logic; Mixed methods; Qualitative research; Semiotics

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846313949     PISSN: 14780887     EISSN: 14780895     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1478088706070842     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bettoni, E., 1946/1961: Duns Scotus: the basic principles of his philosophy. Catholic University of America Press.
2. Crotty, M. 1998: The foundations of social research: meaning and perspective in the research process. Sage.
3. Cuba, E.G. and Lincoln, Y.S. 1994: Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S., editors, Handbook of qualitative research. Sage.
4. Ingham, M.B. 2003: Scotus for dunces: an introduction to the subtle doctor. Franciscan Institute Publications.
5. Janesick, V.J. 1998: 'Stretching' exercises for qualitative researchers. Sage.
6. Johnson, R.B. and Onwuegbuzie, A.J. 2004: Mixed method research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Hesearcher 33, 14-26.
7. Nelson, T.K and Shank, G.D. 1985: Comparison types and paraphrase style in metaphor. Metaphor Research Newsletter 4, 13-14.
8. Pekarik, A.J. and Shank, G. 2000: Convergence, divergence and complexity: three approaches to qualitative inquiry in museum settings. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Visitors Studies Association, Boston, MA, August.
9. Scotus, John Duns. ca. 1300/1962: Philosophical writings: a selection (Woher, A., trans.). Bobbs-Merrill.
10. Shank, G. 1985: Metaphor analysis as a semiotic research tool. In Deely, J., editor, Semiotics: 1984. University Press of America.
11. Shank, G. 1987a: Abductive strategies in educational research. American Journal of Semiotics 5, 275-90.
12. Shank, G. 1987b: On the role of the bestiary in educational research. Invited presidential address for the Special Interest Group: Semiotics in Education, presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC, April.
13. Shank, G. 1988: Three into two will go: the juxtapositional method of research in empirical semiotics. In Deely, J., editor, Semiotics: 1987. University Press of America.
14. Shank, G. 1990: Qualitative vs. quantitative research: a semiotic non-prohlem. In Prewitt T., Deely, J. and Haworth, K, editors, Semiotics: 1989. University Press of America.
15. Shank, G. 1994: Shaping qualitative research in educational psychology. Contemporary Educational Psychology 19, 340-59.
16. Shank, G. 1996: If O-ring booster seals were alive. Mind, Culture, and Activity 3, 203-12.
17. Shank, G. 1998a: The extraordinary ordinary powers of abductive reasoning. Theory and Psychology 8, 841-60.
18. Shank, G.1998b: The lesson of the bestiary. In Ledgerwood, M.D, editor, New approaches to medieval textuality. Lang.
19. Shank, G. 1998c: Rhetorical differences between qualitative and quantitative writing and thinking. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of AERA, San Diego, CA, April.
20. Shank, G. 1999: Qualitative research, semiotics, North Beach, South of Market, Jack London, & the Grateful Dead. International Journal of Applied Semiotics 1, 129-40.
21. Shank, G. 2001: It's logic in practice, my dear Watson: an imaginary memoir from beyond the grave. Forum for Qualitative Studies 2. Retrieved from http://qualitative-research.net/fqs/fqs-eng.htm
22. Shank, G.D. 2002: Qualitative research: a personal skills approach. Prentice-Hall.
23. Shank, G. (in press): Praxical reasoning and the logic of field research. In The handbook of fieldwork. Sage.
24. Shank, G. and Cunningham, D.J., 1996a: Mediated phosphor dots: toward a Post-Cartesian model of computer mediated communication via the semiotic superhighway. In Ess, C., editor, Philosophical issues in computer-mediated communication. SUNY Press.
25. Shank, G. and Cunningham, D.J. 1996b: Modeling the six modes of Peircean abduction for educational purposes. In MAICS 1996 Proceedings. Retrieved from http://www.cs.indiana.edu/event/maics96/Proceedings/shank.html
26. Shank, G. and Gleber, C. 2002: Six metaphors in search of the Internet. Teaching and Learning 17, 55-67.
27. Shank, G.D. and Pekarik, A.J. 2005: Is there a narrative morphology of museum learning? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of AERA, Montreal, Quebec, April.
28. Shank, G. and Villella, O. 2004: Building on new foundations: core principles and new directions for qualitative research - review and commentary. Journal of Educational Hesearch 98, 46-55.
29. Skaggs, S. and Shank, G. 1998: Codification, inference, and specificity in visual communication design. Zed 4, 54-69.