Are discourse communities incommensurable in a fragmented psychology? The possibility of disciplinary coherence

Journal of Mind and Behavior

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 26127-27238

  Slife, B D ^a  

^a BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; COMMUNITY; HUMANITIES; LOGIC; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PHILOSOPHY; PSYCHOLOGY; REVIEW; SCIENCE; STANDARDIZATION;

EID: 0033638957     PISSN: 02710137     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Contextualism in psychological research? A critical review
2. On the very idea of a conceptual scheme
3. Changing patterns of reconstruction
4. Psychology or The Psychological Studies?
5. On what basis are evaluations possible in a fragmented psychology? An alternative to objectivism and relativism
6. Normal science and its dangers
7. A suggested principle of complimentarity for psychology: In theory, not method
8. Free will and time: That 'stuck' feeling
9. Raising the consciousness of researchers: Hidden assumptions in the behavioral sciences
10. Values in Christian families: Do they come from unrecognized idols?
11. Modern and postmodern approaches to the free will/determinism dilemma in psychology
12. Conceptions of determinism in radical behaviorism: A taxonomy
13. Humanistic volition versus behavioristic determinism: Disunified psychology's schism problem and its solution
14. Obstacles to the integration of competing theories in psychology
15. Progress, unity, and three questions about incommensurability
16. Pursuing unity in a fragmented psychology: Problems and prospects