The twenty-first century role of Piver-Rutledge type III radical hysterectomy and FIGO stage IA, IB1, and IB2 cervical cancer in the era of robotic surgery: A personal perspective

Journal of Gynecologic Oncology

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 219-224

  Piver, M Steven ^a   Ghomi, Ali ^a  

^a SISTERS OF CHARITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Cervix cancer; Robotic surgey; Type III radical hysterectomy

Indexed keywords

CANCER SIZE; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURVIVAL; DISEASE SEVERITY; ENDOMETRIUM CANCER; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; REVIEW; ROBOTIC SURGERY; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA;

EID: 79952430919     PISSN: 20050380     EISSN: 20050399     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2010.21.4.219     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Moore DH. Cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 1152-61.
2. Pecorelli S, Zigliani L, Odicino F. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009; 105: 107-8.
3. Piver MS, Lee JY. The 21st century role of Piver type II hysterectomy in FIGO stage IA, IB cervical cancer: a personal perspective. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2008; 29: 109-13. (Pubitemid 351498390)
4. Piver MS, Chung WS. Prognostic significance of cervical lesion size and pelvic node metastases in cervical carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 1975; 46: 507-10.
5. Piver MS, Rutledge F, Smith JP. Five classes of extended hysterectomy for women with cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 1974; 44: 265-72.
6. Pikaart DP, Holloway RW Ahmad S, Finkler NJ, Bigsby GE 4th, Ortiz BH, et al. Clinical-pathologic and morbidity analyses of Types 2 and 3 abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 107: 205-10. (Pubitemid 47575729)
7. Wertheim E. Zur frage der radicaloperation beim uteruskrebs. Arch Gynecol 1900; 61: 627-68.
8. Meigs JV. Radical hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissections: a report of 100 patients operated on five or more years ago. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1951; 62: 854-70.
9. Querleu D, Leblanc E, Castelain B. Pelvic lymphadenectomy under celioscopic guidance. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 1990; 19: 576-8.
10. Nezhat CR, Burrell MO, Nezhat FR, Benigno BB, Welander CE. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with paraaortic and pelvic node dissection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 166: 864-5.
11. Magrina JF. Robotic surgery in gynecology. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2007; 28: 77-82. (Pubitemid 46697774)
12. Zakashansky K, Bradley WH, Nezhat FR. New techniques in radical hysterectomy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2008; 20: 14-9.
13. Zakashansky K, Bradley WH, Chuang L, Rahaman J, Dottino P. Recent advances in the surgical management of cervical cancer. Mt Sinai J Med 2009; 76: 567-76.
14. Ercoli A, Iannone V, Legge F, Fagotti A, Fanfani F, Carone V, et al. Advances in surgical management of cervical cancer. Minerva Ginecol 2009; 61: 227-37.
15. Ramirez PT. Robotic radical hysterectomy: a new standard of care? Future Oncol 2009; 5: 23-5.
16. Fanning J, Hojat R, Johnson J, Fenton B. Robotic radical hysterectomy. Minerva Ginecol 2009; 61: 53-5.
17. Magrina JF, Kho R, Magtibay PM. Robotic radical hysterectomy: technical aspects. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 113: 28-31.
18. Bandera CA, Magrina JF. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2009; 21: 25-30.
19. Magrina JF, Zanagnolo VL. Robotic surgery for cervical cancer. Yonsei Med J 2008; 49: 879-85.
20. Sert BM, Abeler VM. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (Piver type III) with pelvic node dissection: case report. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2006; 27: 531-3.
21. Sert B, Abeler V. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stag ecervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total lapa- roscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now? Int J Med Robot 2007; 3: 224-8. (Pubitemid 350033311)
22. Kim YT, Kim SW, Hyung WJ, Lee SJ, Nam EJ, Lee WJ. Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: a pilot study. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 108: 312-6. (Pubitemid 351174289)
23. Magrina JF, Kho RM, Weaver AL, Montero RP, Magtibay PM. Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 109: 86-91.
24. Fanning J, Fenton B, Purohit M. Robotic radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198: 649.e1-4.
25. Nezhat FR, Datta MS, Liu C, Chuang L, Zakashansky K. Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer. JSLS 2008; 12: 227-37.
26. Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, Shafer A, Ridgway M, Skinner EN, et al. A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199: 357.e1-7.
27. Geisler JP, Orr CJ, Khurshid N, Phibbs G, Manahan KJ. Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy compared with open radical hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2010; 20: 438-42.
28. Piver MS, Marchetti DL, Patton T, Halpern J, Blumenson L, Driscoll DL. Radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy versus radiation therapy for small (less than or equal to 3 cm) stage IB cervical carcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol 1988; 11: 21-4. (Pubitemid 18061716)
29. Hopkins MP, Morley GW. Radical hysterectomy versus radiation therapy for stage IB squamous cell cancer of the cervix. Cancer 1991; 68: 272-7.
30. Landoni F, Maneo A, Colombo A, Placa F, Milani R, Perego P, et al. Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Lancet 1997; 350: 535-40. (Pubitemid 27348428)
31. Cantrell LA, Mendivil A, Gehrig PA, Boggess JF. Survival outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a 3-year experience. Gynecol Oncol 2010; 117: 260-5.