Intrinsic plagiarism analysis

Language Resources and Evaluation

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 63-82

  Stein, Benno ^a   Lipka, Nedim ^a   Prettenhofer, Peter ^a  

^a BAUHAUS UNIVERSITY WEIMAR   (Germany)

Author keywords

Authorship verification; One class classification; Plagiarism detection; Stylometry

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952311058     PISSN: 1574020X     EISSN: 15728412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10579-010-9115-y     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Argamon S.Šarić, M. Stein S.S.
2. Bernstein, Y., & Zobel, J. (2004). A scalable system for identifying co-derivative documents. In A. Apostolico & M. Melucci (Eds.), Proceedings of the string processing and information retrieval symposium (SPIRE) (pp. 55-67). Padova, Italy: Springer. Published as LNCS 3246.
3. Brin, S., Davis, J., & Garcia-Molina, H. (1995). Copy detection mechanisms for digital documents. In SIGMOD '95 (pp. 398-409). New York, NY, USA: ACM Press. ISBN 0-89791-731-6.
4. Broder, A. Z., Eiron, N., Fontoura, M., Herscovici, M., Lempel, R., McPherson, J., et al. (2006). Indexing shared content in information retrieval systems. In EDBT '06 (pp. 313-330).
5. Chall, J. S., & Dale, E. (1995). Readability revisited: The new Dale-Chall readability formula. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
6. Chaski, C. E. (2005). Who's at the keyboard? authorship attribution in digital evidence investigations. IJDE, 4(1), 1-14.
7. Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Kegelmeyer, P. W. (2002). Smote: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 16, 321-357.
8. Choi, F. Y. Y. (2000). Advances in domain independent linear text segmentation. In Proceedings of the first conference on North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics (pp. 26-33). San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
9. Dale, E., & Chall, J. S. (1948). A formula for predicting readability. Educational Research Bulletin, 27, 11-20.
10. Finkel, R. A., Zaslavsky, A., Monostori, K., & Schmidt, H. (2002). Signature extraction for overlap detection in documents. In Proceedings of the 25th Australian conference on Computer science (pp. 59-64). Australian Computer Society, Inc. ISBN 0-909925-82-8.
11. Flesch, R. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32, 221-233.
12. Gionis, A., Indyk, P., & Motwani, R. (1999). Similarity search in high dimensions via hashing. In Proceedings of the 25th VLDB conference Edinburgh, Scotland (pp. 518-529).
13. Graham, N., Hirst, G., & Marthi, B. (2005). Segmenting a document by stylistic character. Natural Language Engineering, 11(4), 397-415. Supersedes August 2003 workshop version.
14. Gunning, R. (1952). The technique of clear writing. New York: McGraw-Hill.
15. Henzinger, M. (2006). Finding near-duplicate web pages: A large-scale evaluation of algorithms. In SIGIR '06: Proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval (pp. 284-291). New York, NY, USA: ACM Press. ISBN 1-59593-369-7. doi: 10. 1145/1148170. 1148222.
16. Hilton, M. L., & Holmes, D. I. (1993). An assessment of cumulative sum charts for authorship attribution. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 8(2), 73-80.
17. Hinton, G. E., & Salakhutdinov, R. R. (2006). Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science, 313, 504-507.
18. Hoad, T. C., & Zobel, J. (2003). Methods for identifying versioned and plagiarised documents. American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(3), 203-215.
19. Holmes, D. I. (1998). The evolution of stylometry in humanities scholarship. Literary and Linguistic, 13(3), 111-117. doi: 10. 1093/llc/13. 3. 111.
20. Honore, A. (1979). Some simple measures of richness of vocabulary. Association for Literary and Linguistic Computing Bulletin, 7(2), 172-177.
21. Indyk, P., & Motwani, R. (1998). Approximate nearest neighbor-Towards removing the curse of dimensionality. In Proceedings of the 30th symposium on theory of computing (pp. 604-613).
22. Juola, P. (2006). Authorship attribution. Foundation Trends Information Retrieval 1(3), 233-334, ISSN 1554-0669. doi: 10. 1561/1500000005.
23. Kacmarcik, G., & Gamon, M. (2006). Obfuscating document stylometry to preserve author anonymity. In Proceedings of the COLING/ACL on main conference poster sessions (pp. 444-451). Morristown, NJ, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
24. Kincaid, J., Fishburne, R. P., Rogers, R. L., & Chissom, B. S. (1975). Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, fog count and flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel. Research branch report 8-75. Millington TN: Naval Technical Training US Naval Air Station.
25. Kjell, B., Woods Addison, W., & Frieder, O. (1994). Discrimination of authorship using visualization. Information Processing and Management, 30(1), 141-150. ISSN 0306-4573. doi: 10. 1016/0306-4573(94)90029-9.
26. Kleinberg, J. (1997). Two algorithms for nearest-neighbor search in high dimensions. In STOC '97: Proceedings of the twenty-ninth annual ACM symposium on theory of computing.
27. Koppel, M., & Schler, J. (2003). Exploiting stylistic idiosyncrasies for authorship attribution. In Proceedings of IJCAI'03 workshop on computational approaches to style analysis and synthesis. Mexico: Acapulco.
28. Koppel, M., & Schler, J. (2004a). Authorship verification as a one-class classification problem. In ICML '04: Proceedings of the twenty-first international conference on Machine learning (pp. 62). New York, NY, USA: ACM. ISBN 1-58113-828-5. doi:10.1145/1015330.1015448.
29. Koppel, M., & Schler, J. (2004b). Authorship verification as a one-class classification problem. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on machine learning. Banff, Canada: ACM Press.
30. Koppel, M., Schler, J., Argamon, S., & Messeri, E. (2006). Authorship attribution with thousands of candidate authors. In Proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval (pp. 659-660). New York, NY, USA: ACM. ISBN 1-59593-369-7. doi: 10. 1145/1148170. 1148304.
31. Koppel, M., Schler, J., & Bonchek-Dokow, E. (2007). Measuring differentiability: Unmasking pseudonymous authors. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 8, 1261-1276. ISSN 1533-7928.
32. Koppel, M., Schler, J., & Argamon, S. (2009). Computational methods in authorship attribution. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 9-26.
33. Malyutov, M. B. (2006). Authorship attribution of texts: A review. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2063, 362-380.
34. Manevitz, L. M., & Yousef, M. (2001). One-class SVMs for document classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2, 139-154.
35. Mansfield, J. S. (2004). Textbook plagiarism in psy101 general psychology: incidence and prevention. In Proceedings of the 18th annual conference on undergraduate teaching of psychology: Ideas and innovations. New York, USA: SUNY Farmingdale.
36. Meyer zu Eissen, S., & Stein, B. (2004). Genre classification of web pages: User study and feasibility analysis. In S. Biundo, T. Frühwirth, & G. Palm (Eds.), KI 2004: Advances in artificial intelligence, vol. 3228 LNAI of Lecture Notes in artificial intelligence (pp. 256-269). Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer. ISBN 0302-9743.
37. Meyer zu Eissen, S., & Stein, B. (2006). Intrinsic plagiarism detection. In M. Lalmas, A. MacFarlane, S. M. Rüger, A. Tombros, T. Tsikrika, & A. Yavlinsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the European conference on information retrieval (ECIR 2006), vol. 3936 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 565-569). New York: Springer. ISBN 3-540-33347-9.
38. Meyer zu Eissen, S., Stein, B., & Kulig, M. (2007). Plagiarism detection without reference collections. In R. Decker & H. J. Lenz (Eds.), Advances in data analysis (pp. 359-366). New York: Springer. ISBN 978-3-540-70980-0.
39. Morton, A. Q., & Michaelson, S. (1990). The qsum plot. Technical report, University of Edinburg.
40. Mosteller, F., & Wallace, D. L. (1964). Inference and disputed authorship: Federalist papers. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc, 1964. ISBN 0201048655.
41. Pavelec, D., Oliveira, L. S., Justino, E. J. R., & Batista, L. V. (2008). Using conjunctions and adverbs for author verification. Journal of UCS, 14(18), 2967-2981.
42. Potthast, M., Eiselt, A., Stein, B., Barròn Cedeño, A., & Rosso, P. (Eds.). (2009). Webis at Bauhaus-Universität Weimar and NLEL at Universidad Polytécnica de Valencia. PAN Plagiarism Corpus 2009 (PAN-PC-09). http://www. webis. de/research/corpora.
43. Rätsch, G., Mika, S., Schölkopf, B., & Müller, K.-R. (2002). Constructing boosting algorithms from SVMs: An application to one-class classification. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 24(9), 1184-1199. ISSN 0162-8828. doi: 10. 1109/TPAMI. 2002. 1033211.
44. Reynar, J. C. (1998). Topic segmentation: Algorithms and applications. Ph. D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
45. Rudman, J. (1997). The state of authorship attribution studies: Some problems and solutions. Computers and the Humanities, 31, 351-365.
46. Russel, S. J., & Norvig, P. (1995). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
47. Sanderson, C., & Guenter, S. (2006a). On authorship attribution via markov chains and sequence kernels. In Pattern recognition, 2006. ICPR 2006. 18th international conference on (vol. 3, pp. 437-440). doi: 10. 1109/ICPR. 2006. 899.
48. Sanderson, C., & Guenter, S. (2006b). Short text authorship attribution via sequence kernels, markov chains and author unmasking: An investigation. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 482-491). URL http://acl. ldc. upenn. edu/W/W06/W06-1657. pdf.
49. Stamatatos, E. (2007). Author identification using imbalanced and limited training texts. In A. M. Tjoa & R. R. Wagner (Eds.), 18th international conference on database and expert systems applications (DEXA 07) (pp. 237-241). IEEE, September 2007. ISBN 0-7695-2932-1. doi: 10. 1109/DEXA. 2007. 37.
50. Stamatatos, E. (2009). A survey of modern authorship attribution methods. Journal of American Society for Information Science & Technology, 60(3), 538-556. ISSN 1532-2882. doi: 10. 1002/asi. v60: 3.
51. Stamatatos, E., Fakotakis, N., & Kokkinakis, G. (2001). Computer-based authorship attribution without lexical measures. Computers and the Humanities, 35, 193-214.
52. Stefik, M. (1995). Introduction to knowledge systems. San Mateo, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann.
53. Stein, B. (2005). Fuzzy-fingerprints for text-based information retrieval. In K. Tochtermann & H. Maurer (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th international conference on knowledge management (I-KNOW 05), Graz, Journal of Universal Computer Science (pp. 572-579). Know-Center.
54. Stein, B. (2007). Principles of hash-based text retrieval. In C. Clarke, N. Fuhr, N. Kando, W. Kraaij, & A. de Vries (Eds.), 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference (pp. 527-534). ACM, July 2007. ISBN 987-1-59593-597-7.
55. Stein, B., & Meyer zu Eissen, S. (2007). Intrinsic plagiarism analysis with meta learning. In B. Stein, M. Koppel, & E. Stamatatos (Eds.), SIGIR workshop workshop on plagiarism analysis, authorship identification, and near-duplicate detection (PAN 07) (pp. 45-50). CEUR-WS. org, July 2007. URL http://ceur-ws. org/Vol-276.
56. Stein, B., & Meyer zu Eissen, S. (2007). Topic-identifikation: Formalisierung, analyse und neue Verfahren. KI-Künstliche Intelligenz, 3, 16-22. ISSN 0933-1875. URL http://www. kuenstliche-intelligenz. de/index. php?id=7758.
57. Stein, B., Lipka, N., & Meyer zu Eissen, S. (2008). Meta analysis within authorship verification. In A. M. Tjoa & R. R. Wagner (Eds.), 19th international conference on database and expert systems applications (DEXA 08) (pp. 34-39). IEEE, September 2008. ISBN 978-0-7695-3299-8. doi: 10. 1109/DEXA. 2008. 20.
58. Surdulescu R. (2004). Verifying authorship. Final project report CS391L, University of Texas at Austin.
59. Tax, D. M. J. (2001). One-class classification. Ph. D. thesis, Technische Universiteit Delft.
60. Tax D. M. J., & Duin, R. P. W. (2001). Combining one-class classifiers. In Proceedings of the second international workshop on multiple classifier systems (pp. 299-308). New York: Springer. ISBN 3-540-42284-6.
61. Tweedie, F. J., & Baayen, H. R. (1998). How variable may a constant be? measures of lexical richness in perspective. Computers and the Humanities 32(5): 323-352. doi: 10. 1023/A: 1001749303137.
62. van Halteren, H. (2004). Linguistic profiling for author recognition and verification. In ACL '04: Proceedings of the 42nd annual meeting on association for computational linguistics (pp. 199). Morristown, NJ, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10. 3115/1218955. 1218981.
63. van Halteren, H. (2007). Author verification by linguistic profiling: An exploration of the parameter space. ACM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing, 4(1), 1. ISSN 1550-4875. doi: 10. 1145/1187415. 1187416.
64. Yang, H., & Callan, J. P. (2006). Near-duplicate detection by instance-level constrained clustering. In E. N. Efthimiadis, S. Dumais, D. Hawking, & K. Järvelin (Eds.), SIGIR '06: Proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval (pp. 421-428). ISBN 1-59593-369-7.
65. Yule, G. (1944). The statistical study of literary vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66. Zheng, R., Li, J., Chen, H., & Huang, Z. (2006). A framework for authorship identification of online messages: Writing-style features and classification techniques. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 378-393. doi: 10. 1002/asi. 20316.
67. Zipf, G. K. (1932). Selective studies and the principle of relative frequency in language.