Quality control in LC-MS/MS

Proteomics

Volumn 11, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1026-1030

  Köcher, Thomas ^a   Pichler, Peter ^b   Swart, Remco ^c   Mechtler, Karl ^a,d  

^a RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^c Dionex Corporation   (Netherlands)

^d INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR BIOTECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

LC MS MS; Quality control; Systems Biology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; LABORATORY TEST; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; QUALITY CONTROL; REPRODUCIBILITY;

CHROMATOGRAPHY, LIQUID; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; PROTEOMICS; QUALITY CONTROL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 79952296069     PISSN: 16159853     EISSN: 16159861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201000578     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Aebersold, R., Mann, M., Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 2003, 422, 198-207.
2. Domon, B., Aebersold, R., Review - mass spectrometry and protein analysis. Science 2006, 312, 212-217.
3. Han, X. M., Aslanian, A., Yates, J. R., Mass spectrometry for proteomics. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2008, 12, 483-490.
4. Nesvizhskii, A. I., Vitek, O., Aebersold, R., Analysis and validation of proteomic data generated by tandem mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 2007, 4, 787-797.
5. Rappsilber, J., Mann, M., What does it mean to identify a protein in proteomics? Trends Biochem. Sci. 2002, 27, 74-78.
6. Nesvizhskii, A. I., Aebersold, R., Interpretation of shotgun proteomic data - the protein inference problem. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2005, 4, 1419-1440.
7. de Godoy, L. M. F., Olsen, J. V., Cox, J., Nielsen, M. L. et al., Comprehensive mass-spectrometry-based proteome quantification of haploid versus diploid yeast. Nature 2008, 455, U1251-U1260.
8. Brunner, E., Ahrens, C. H., Mohanty, S., Baetschmann, H. et al., A high-quality catalog of the Drosophila melanogaster proteome. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007, 25, 576-583.
9. Mann, M., Comparative analysis to guide quality improvements in proteomics. Nat. Methods 2009, 6, 717-719.
10. Bell, A. W., Deutsch, E. W., Au, C. E., Kearney, R. E. et al., A HUPO test sample study reveals common problems in mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat. Methods 2009, 6, U423-U440.
11. Bradshaw, R. A., Burlingame, A. L., Carr, S., Aebersold, R., Reporting protein identification data - the next generation of guidelines. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2006, 5, 787-788.
12. Wilkins, M. R., Appel, R. D., Van Eyk, J. E., Chung, M. C. M. et al., Guidelines for the next 10 years of proteomics. Proteomics 2006, 6, 4-8.
13. Elias, J. E., Gygi, S. P., Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 2007, 4, 207-214.
14. Moore, R. E., Young, M. K., Lee, T. D., Qscore: an algorithm for evaluating SEQUEST database search results. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2002, 13, 378-386.
15. Ahmed, F. E., Sample preparation and fractionation for proteome analysis and cancer biomarker discovery by mass spectrometry. J. Sep. Sci. 2009, 32, 771-798.
16. Mitulovic, G., Smoluch, M., Chervet, J. P., Steinmacher, I. et al., An improved method for tracking and reducing the void volume in nano HPLC-MS with micro trapping columns. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2003, 376, 946-951.
17. Mitulovic, G., Stingl, C., Steinmacher, I., Hudecz, O. et al., Preventing carryover of peptides and proteins in nano LC-MS separations. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 5955-5960.
18. Makarov, A., Denisov, E., Kholomeev, A., Baischun, W. et al., Performance evaluation of a hybrid linear ion trap/orbitrap mass spectrometer. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 2113-2120.
19. Nesvizhskii, A. I., Keller, A., Kolker, E., Aebersold, R., A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 4646-4658.