Digital breast imaging: Tomosynthesis and digital subtraction mammography

Breast Disease

Volumn 10, Issue 3-4, 1998, Pages 151-164

  Niklason, Loren T ^a   Kopans, Daniel B ^a   Hamberg, Leena M ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; IODINE;

ANGIOGRAPHY; BREAST; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; DENSITY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION MAMMOGRAPHY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TOMOGRAPHY; TOMOSYNTHESIS;

EID: 0031714418     PISSN: 08886008     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/BD-1998-103-415     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Holland R, Mravunac M, Hendriks JHCL, Bekker BV. So-called interval cancers of the breast. Cancer 1982; 49:2527-2533.
2. Martin J, Moskowitz M, Milbrath JR. Breast cancers missed by mammography. AJR 1979; 132:737-739.
3. Holland R, Hendriks JHCL, Mravunac M. Mammographically occult breast cancer: a pathologic and radiologie study. Cancer 1983; 52:1810-1819.
4. Feig S, Shaber G, Patchefsky A, et al. Analysis of clinically occult and mammographically occult breast tumors. AJR 1977; 128:403-408.
5. Ma L, Fishell E, Wright B, Hanna W, Allan S, Boyd NF. Case-control study of factors associated with failure to detect breast cancer by mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 1992; 84:781-785.
6. Jackson, VP, Hendrick RE, Feig SA, Kopans DB. Imaging of the radiographically dense breast. Radiology 1993; 188: 297-301.
7. Bird R, Wallace T, Yankaskas B. Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology 1992; 184:613-617.
8. Williams MB, Schnall MD, Fajardo LL. Future directions in imaging of breast diseases. Radiology 1998; 206:297-300.
9. Bassett L. Incorporating new technologies into clinical practice. Radiology 1998; 206:301-303.
10. Schmidt RA, Nishikawa RM. Clinical use of digital mammography: the present and the prospects. J Digital Imaging 1995; 8(S-1):74-79.
11. Ravin CE. Future directions in pulmonary imaging. Radiology 1998; 206:9-10.
12. Niklason LT, Christian BT, Niklason LE, et al. Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging, Radiology 1997; 205:399-406
13. Ziedses des Plantes BG. Eine neue methode zur diffenzierung in der rontgenographie (planigraphie). Acta Radiol 1932; 13:182-192.
14. Miller ER, McCurry EM, Hruka B. An infinite number of laminagrams from a finite number of radiographs. Radiology 1971; 98:249-255.
15. Garrison JB, Grant DG, Guier WH, Johns RJ. Three dimensional roentgenography. AJR 1969; 105:903-908.
16. Richards AG. Variable depth laminagraphy. Biomed Sci Instrum 1969; 6:194-199.
17. Chakraborty DP, Yester MV, Barnes GT, Lakshminarayanan AV. Self-masking subtraction tomosynthesis. Radiology 1984; 150:225-229.
18. Edholm PR, Quiling L. Reduction of linear blurring in tomography. Radiology 1969; 92:1115-1118.
19. Edholm P, Quiding L. Elimination of blur in linear tomography. Acta Radiol 1970; 10:441-447.
20. Kolitsi Z, Panayiotakis G, Pallikarakis N. A method for selective removal of out-of-plane structures in digital tomosynthesis. Med Phys 1993; 20(1):47-50.
21. Ghosh Roy DN, Kruger RA, Yih B, Del Rio P. Selective plane removal in limited angle tomographic imaging. Med Phys 1985; 12:65-70.
22. Ruttiman UE, Qi XL, Webber RL. An optimal synthetic aperture for circular tomosynthesis. Med Phys 1989; 16:398-405.
23. Sone S, Kasuga T, Sakai F, et al. Chest imaging with dual-energy subtraction digital tomosynthesis. Acta Radiol 1993; 34:346-349.
24. Sone S, Kasuga T, Sakai F, et al. Development of a high-resolution digital tomosynthesis system and its clinical application. Radiographies 1991; 11(5):807-822.
25. Kruger RA, Sedaghati M, Roy DG, et al. Tomosynthesis applied to digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 1984; 152:805-808.
26. deVries N, Miller FJ, Wojtowycz MM, et al. Tomographic digital subtraction angiography: initial clinical studies using tomosynthesis. Radiology 1985; 157:239-241.
27. Baily NA, Lasser EC, Crepeau RL. Electrofluoroplanigraphy. Radiology 1973; 107:669-671.
28. Baily NA, Crepeau RL, Lasser EC. Fluoroscopic tomography. Invest Radiol 1981; 16:126-132.
29. Maravilla KR, Murry RC, Horner S. Digital tomosynthesis: technique for electronic reconstructive tomography. AJR 1983; 141:497-502.
30. Maravilla KR, Murry RC, Diehl J, et al. Digital tomosynthesis: technique modification and clinical application for neurovascular anatomy. Radiology 1984; 152:719-724.
31. Kopans DB. The positive predictive value of mammography. AJR 1992; 158:521-526.
32. Hall FM, Storella JM, Silverstone DZ, Wyshak G. Nonpalpable breast lesions: recommendation for biopsy based on suspicion of carcinoma at mammography. Radiology 1988; 167:353-358.
33. Sickles EA. Mammographic features of 300 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers. AJR 1986; 146:661-663.
34. Ng K-H, Looi L-M, Bradley DA. Microcalcification clustering parameters in breast disease: a morphometric analysis of radiographs of excision specimens. Br J Radiol 1996; 69:326-334.
35. Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL, et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology 1993; 187:493-501.
36. Folkman J, Klagsbrun M. Angiogenic Factors. Science 1987; 235:442-447.
37. Macchiarini P, Fontanini G, Hardin MJ, Squartini F, Angeletti CA. Relation of neovascularisation to metastasis of non-small lung cancer. Lancet 1992; 340: 145-146.
38. Macchiarini P, Fontanini G, Dulmet E, et al. Angiogenesis: an indicator of metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer invading the thoracic inlet. Ann Thoracic Surg 1994; 57: 1534-1539.
39. Gasparini G, Harris AL. Clinical importance of the determination of tumor angiogenesis in breast caracinoma: much more than a new prognostic tool. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13: 765-782.
40. Kaiser WA, Zeitler E. MR, Imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Radiology 1989; 170: 681-686.
41. Frouge C, Guinebretiere J-M, Contesso G, Di Paola R, Blery M. Correlation between contrast enhancement in dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the breast and tumor angiogenesis. Invest Radiol 1994; 29: 1043-1049.
42. Hulka CA, Smith BL, Sgroi DC, et al. Benign and malignant breast lesions: differentiation with echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 1995; 197: 33-38.
43. Buadu LD, Murakami J, Murayama S, et al. Breast lesions: correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogeaesis, Radiology 1996; 200: 639-649.
44. Tabar L, Duffy SW, Krusemo UB. Detection method, tumor size and node metastases in breast cancers diagnosed during a trail of breast cancer screening. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 1987; 23:959-962.
45. Watt AC, Ackerman LV, Windham JP, et al. Breast lesions: Differential diagnosis using digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 1986; 159: 39-42.
46. Zagzag D., Brem S., Robert F. Neovascularization and tumor growth in the rabbit brain. A model for experimental studies of angiogenesis and blood-brain barrier. Am J Pathol 1988; 131: 361-372.