The continuing need to investigate the nature and content of teleconsultation communication using interaction analysis techniques

Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 55-64

  Miller, Edward Alan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMMUNICATION DISORDER; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; STANDARD; TELECONSULTATION; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VIDEOCONFERENCING;

COMMUNICATION; COMMUNICATION BARRIERS; HUMANS; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; REMOTE CONSULTATION; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VIDEOCONFERENCING;

EID: 79952231025     PISSN: 1357633X     EISSN: 17581109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/jtt.2010.100203     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Grigsby B. 2004 TRC Report on US Telemedicine Activity, With an Overview of Non-US Activity. Kingston, New Jersey: Civic Research Institute Inc, 2004
2. Blum JD. Internet medicine and the evolving legal status of the physician-patient relationship. J Leg Med 2003;24:413-55
3. Craft RL. Toward technical interoperability in telemedicine. Telemed J E Health 2005;11:384-404
4. Goldberg MA, Sharman Z, Bell B, Ho K, Patil N. E-health and the Universitas 21 organization: 4. Professional portability. J Telemed Telecare 2005;11:230-3
5. Kleinke JD. Dot-gov: market failure and the creation of a national health information technology system. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005;24:1246-62
6. Kuszler PC. Telemedicine and integrated health care delivery: compounding malpractice liability. Am J Law Med 1999;25:297-326
7. Miller EA, West DM. Where's the revolution? Digital technology and health care in the internet age. J Health Polit Policy Law 2009;34:261-84
8. Parrott R, Burgoon JK, Burgoon M, LePoire BA. Privacy between physicians and patients: more than a matter of confidentiality. Soc Sci Med 1989;29:1381-5
9. Miller RH, Sim I. Physicians' use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions. Health Aff (Millwood) 2004;23:116-26
10. Middleton B. Achieving U.S. Health information technology adoption: the need for a third hand. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005;24:1269-72
11. Miller EA, West DM. Characteristics associated with use of public and private web sites as sources of health care information: results from a national survey. Med Care 2007;45:245-51
12. Miller EA, West DM, Wasserman M. Health information websites: characteristics of US users by race and ethnicity. J Telemed Telecare 2007;13:298-302
13. Starr P. Health and the right to privacy. Am J Law Med 1999;25:193-201
14. Wallwiener M, Wallwiener CW, Kansy JK, Seeger H, Rajab TK. Impact of electronic messaging on the patient-physician interaction. J Telemed Telecare 2009;15:243-50
15. Walker J, Pan E, Johnston D, Adler-Milstein J, Bates DW, Middleton B. The value of health care information exchange interoperability. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005 Jan-Jun; Suppl Web Exclusives:W5-10-W5-18
16. West DM, Miller EA. Digital Medicine: Health Care in the Internet Era. Washington DC: Brookings Institution, 2009
17. West DM, Miller EA. The digital divide in public e-health: barriers to accessibility and privacy in state health department websites. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2006;17:652-67
18. Wootton R, Jebamani LS, Dow SA. E-health and the Universitas 21 organization: 2. Telemedicine and underserved populations. J Telemed Telecare 2005;11:221-4
19. Bashshur RL. Public acceptance of telemedicine in a rural community. Biosciences Communication 1978;4:17-38
20. Bashshur RL, Lathan CE. Human factors in telemedicine. Telemed J 1999;5:127-8
21. Demiris G, Tao D. An analysis of the specialized literature in the field of telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 2005;11:316-19
22. Joint Working Group on Telemedicine, Department of Commerce. Telemedicine Report to Congress, January 31, 1997. See http://www.ntia.doc.gov/reports/telemed/index.htm (last checked 12 August 2010)
23. Hailey D, Ohinmaa A, Roine R. Study quality and evidence of benefit in recent assessments of telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 2004;10:318-24
24. Hjelm NM. Benefits and drawbacks of telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 2005;11:60-70
25. Miller EA. Solving the disjuncture between research and practice: telehealth trends in the 21st century. Health Policy 2007;82:133-41
26. Bashshur RL. On the definition and evaluation of telemedicine. Telemed J 1995;1:19-30
27. Esser PE, Goossens RH. A framework for the design of user-centred teleconsulting systems. J Telemed Telecare 2009;15:32-9
28. Miller EA. Telemedicine and doctor-patient communication: a theoretical framework for evaluation. J Telemed Telecare 2002;8:311-18
29. Onor ML, Misan S. The clinical interview and the doctor-patient relationship in telemedicine. Telemed J E Health 2005;11:102-5
30. Wootton R, Darkins A. Telemedicine and the doctor-patient relationship. J R Coll Physicians Lond 1997;31:598-9
31. Miller EA. The technical and interpersonal aspects of telemedicine: effects on doctor-patient communication. J Telemed Telecare 2003;9:1-7
32. Roter DL, Hall JA. Doctors Talking with Patients/ Patients Talking with Doctors: Improving Communication in Medical Visits. Wesport, Connecticut: Auburn House, 1992
33. Roter DL, Hall JA, Merisca R, Nordstrom B, Cretin D, Svarstad B. Effectiveness of interventions to improve patient compliance: a meta-analysis. Med Care 1998;36:1138-61
34. Bashshur RL. Rethinking the evaluation and priorities in telemedicine. Telemed J 1998;4:1-4
35. Buck S. Nine human factors contributing to the user acceptance of telemedicine applications: a cognitive-emotional approach. J Telemed Telecare 2009;15:55-8
36. Whitten PS, Mair F. Telemedicine and patient satisfaction: current status and future directions. Telemed J E Health 2000;6:417-23
37. Whitten P, Love B. Patient and provider satisfaction with the use of telemedicine: overview and rationale for cautious enthusiasm. J Postgrad Med 2005;51:294-300
38. Miller EA. Telemedicine and doctor-patient communication: an analytical survey of the literature. J Telemed Telecare 2001;7:1-17
39. Miller EA. Telepsychiatry and doctor-patient communication: an analysis of the empirical literature. In: Wootton R, Yellowlees P, McLaren P, eds. Telepsychiatry and E-mental Health. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press, 2003
40. Agha Z, Schapira RM, Laud PW, McNutt G, Roter DL. Patient satisfaction with physician-patient communication during telemedicine. Telemed J E Health 2009;15:830-9
41. Mucic D. International telepsychiatry: a study of patient acceptability. J Telemed Telecare 2008;14:241-3
42. Spaulding RJ, Davis K, Patterson J. A comparison of telehealth and face-to-face presentation for school professionals supporting students with chronic illness. J Telemed Telecare 2008;14:211-14
43. Hall JA, Dornan MC. Meta-analysis of satisfaction with medical care: description of research domain and analysis of overall satisfaction levels. Soc Sci Med 1988;27:637-44
44. Roter DL, Hall JA. Studies of doctor-patient interaction. Annu Rev Public Health 1989;10:163-80
45. Roter D, Larson S. The Roter interaction analysis system (RIAS): utility and flexibility for analysis of medical interactions. Patient Educ Couns 2002;46:243-51
46. Roter D, Hall J, Katz N. Patient-physician communication: a descriptive summary of the literature. Patient Educ Couns 1988;12:99-119
47. Ong LM, de Haes JC, Hoos AM, Lammes FB. Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature. Soc Sci Med 1995;40:903-18
48. Roter D. The Roter Method of Interaction Process Analysis. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University, 2002
49. Boon H, Stewart M. Patient-physician communication assessment instruments: 1986 to 1996 in review. Patient Educ Couns 1998;35:161-76
50. Miller EA, Nelson EL. Modifying the Roter Interaction Analysis System to study provider-patient communication in telemedicine: promises, pitfalls, insights, and recommendations. Telemed J E Health 2005;11:44-55
51. Nelson EL, Miller EA, Larson KA. Reliability associated with the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS) adapted for the telemedicine context. Patient Educ Couns 2010;78:72-8
52. Agha Z, Roter DL, Schapira RM. An evaluation of patient-physician communication style during telemedicine consultations. J Med Internet Res 2009;11:e36
53. Ball CJ, McLaren PM, Summerfield AB, Lipsedge MS, Watson JP. A comparison of communication modes in adult psychiatry. J Telemed Telecare 1995;1:22-6
54. Demiris G, Speedie S, Finkelstein S, Harris I. Communication patterns and technical quality of virtual visits in home care. J Telemed Telecare 2003;9:210-15
55. Demiris G, Edison K, Vijaykumar S. A comparison of communication models of traditional and video-mediated health care delivery. Int J Med Inform 2005;74:851-6
56. Liu X, Sawada Y, Takizawa T et al. Doctor-patient communication: a comparison between telemedicine consultation face-to-face consultation. Intern Med 2007;46:227-32
57. Sävenstedt S, Bucht G, Norberg L, Sandman PO. Nurse-doctor interaction in teleconsultations between a hospital and a geriatric nursing home. J Telemed Telecare 2002;8:11-18
58. Street RL, Wheeler EJ, McCaughan WT. Specialist-primary care provider-patient communication in telemedicine consultations. Telemed J 2000;6:45-54
59. Tachakra S, Rajani R. Social presence in telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 2002;8:226-30
60. Wakefield BJ, Bylund CL, Holman JE, et al. Nurse and patient communication profiles in a home-based telehealth intervention for heart failure management. Patient Educ Couns 2008;71:285-92
61. Pappas Y, Seale C. The opening phase of telemedicine consultations: an analysis of interaction. Soc Sci Med 2009;68:1229-37
62. MacFarlane A, Harrison R, Murray E, Wallace P. A qualitative study of communication during joint teleconsultations at the primary-secondary care interface. J Telemed Telecare 2006;12 (Suppl. 1):24-6
63. Torppa MA, Timonen O, Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi S, Larivaara P, Leiman M. Patient-nurse-doctor interaction in general practice teleconsultations-a qualitative analysis. J Telemed Telecare 2006;12:306-10
64. Harrison R, Macfarlane A, Murray E, Wallace P. Patients' perceptions of joint teleconsultations: a qualitative evaluation. Health Expect 2006;9:81-90