Nine human factors contributing to the user acceptance of telemedicine applications: A cognitive-emotional approach

Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 55-58

  Buck, Susanne ^a  

^a Adaptize   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSUMER; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HOME CARE; HUMAN; MOTIVATION; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; RURAL HEALTH CARE; STANDARD; TELEMEDICINE;

CONSUMER SATISFACTION; HOME CARE SERVICES; HUMANS; MOTIVATION; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; RURAL HEALTH SERVICES; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 65649150387     PISSN: 1357633X     EISSN: 17581109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/jtt.2008.008007     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Whitten P, Love B. Patient and provider satisfaction with the use of telemedicine: overview and rationale for cautious enthusiasm. J Postgrad Med 2005;51:294-300
2. Broens TH, Huis in't Veld RM, Vollenbroek-Hutten MM, Hermens HJ, van Halteren AT, Nieuwenhuis LJ. Determinants of successful telemedicine implementations: a literature study. J Telemed Telecare 2007;13:303-9
3. Spaulding RJ, Russo T, Cook DJ, Doolittle GC. Diffusion theory and telemedicine adoption by Kansas health-care providers: critical factors in telemedicine adoption for improved patient access. J Telemed Telecare 2005;11 (Suppl. 1):107-9
4. Port K, Palm K, Viigimaa M. Daily usage and efficiency of remote home monitoring in hypertensive patients over a one-year period. J Telemed Telecare 2005;11 (Suppl. 1):34-6
5. Schmidt S, Sheikzadeh S, Beil B, Patten M, Stettin J. Acceptance of telemonitoring to enhance medication compliance in patients with chronic heart failure. Telemed J E-Health 2008;14:426-33
6. Salvemini AV. Challenges for user-interface designers of telemedicine systems. Telemed J 1999;5:163-8
7. Nielsen J. Ten usability heuristics. See http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic/heuristic_list.html (last accessed 23 November 2008)
8. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th edn. New York: Free Press, 2003
9. Chau PYK, Hu PJ-H. Investigating healthcare professionals' decisions to accept telemedicine technology: an empirical test of competing theories. Information and Management 2002;39:297-311
10. Haas P. Kritische thesen zu patientenbezogenen anwendungen der gesundheitstelematik. Bundesgesundheitsbl-Gesundheitsforsch-Gesundheitsschutz 2005;48:771-7
11. Bulik RJ. Human factors in primary care telemedicine encounters. J Telemed Telecare 2008;14:169-72
12. Finch TL, Mair FS, May CR. Teledermatology in the UK: lessons in service innovation. Br J Dermatol 2007;156:521-7
13. Anderson JG. Clearing the way for physicians' use of clinical information systems. Comm ACM 1997;40:83-90
14. Anderson JG, Aydin CE. Evaluating the impact of health care information systems. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1997;13:380-93
15. Brennan DM, Barker LM. Human factors in the development and implementation of telerehabilitation systems. J Telemed Telecare 2008;14:55-8
16. Schultz C. Management von kunden der doc2patient telemedizin. In: Schultz C, Gemünden HG, Salomo S (Hrsg.). Akzeptanz der Telemedizin. Darmstadt: Minerva KG, 2005
17. Miller EA. The technical and interpersonal aspect of telemedicine: effects on doctor-patient communication. J Telemed Telecare 2003;9:1-7
18. Schmidt S, Koch U. Akzeptanz der gesundheitstelematik bei ihren anwendern. Bundesgesundheitsbl-Gesundheitsforsch-Gesundheitsschutz 2005;48:778-88