A comparison of telehealth and face-to-face presentation for school professionals supporting students with chronic illness

Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 211-214

  Spaulding, Ryan J ^a   Davis, Kathy ^b   Patterson, James ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; STANDARD; STUDENT; TELEMEDICINE; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

CHILD; CHRONIC DISEASE; FACULTY; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; KANSAS; MALE; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROGRAM EVALUATION; STUDENTS; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 53749107506     PISSN: 1357633X     EISSN: 17581109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/jtt.2008.071003     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Suris JC. Chronic conditions and adolescence. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2003;16 (Suppl. 2):247-51
2. Larter N, Neff JM. Children with special needs: The case for a collaborative care system. Washington Public Health 1996: 14. See http://www.nwpublichealth.org/docs/wph/needs.html (last checked 7 February 2008)
3. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. Students with Chronic Illnesses: Guidance for Families, Schools, and Students. See http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/public/lung/asthma/guidfam.pdf (last checked 24 January 2008)
4. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. AHRQ Focus on Research: Children With Chronic Illness and Disabilities. AHRQ Publication No. 02-M025, 2002. See http://www.ahrq.gov/news/focus/chchild.htm (last checked 24 January 2008)
5. Vitulano LA. Psychosocial issues for children and adolescents with chronic illness: self-esteem, school functioning and sports participation. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am 2003;12:585-92
6. US Department of Agriculture. Economic Research Service. See http://www.ers.usda.gov/StateFacts/KS.htm (last checked 21 January 2008)
7. Johnson A, Gorman M, Lewis C, Baker F, Coulehan N, Rader J. Interactive videoconferencing improves nutrition intervention in a rural population. J Am Diet Assoc 2001;101:173-4
8. Bynum AB, Cranford CO, Irwin CA, Denny GS. Participant satisfaction with a school telehealth education program using interactive compressed video delivery methods in rural Arkansas. J Sch Health 2002;72:235-42
9. Eaton KA, Francis CA, Odell EW, Reynolds PA, Mason RD. Participating dentists' assessment of the pilot regional online videoconferencing in dentistry (PROVIDENT) project. Br Dent J 2001;191:330-5
10. Callas PW, Ricci MA, Caputo MP. Improved rural provider access to continuing medical education through interactive videoconferencing. Telemed J E Health 2000;6:393-9
11. Lanza V. How to develop a low cost, in-house distance learning center for continuing medical education. Part 1. J Clin Monit Comput 2002;17:413-19