Speech perception and production

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science

Volumn 1, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 629-647

  Casserly, Elizabeth D ^a   Pisoni, David B ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952210105     PISSN: 19395078     EISSN: 19395086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wcs.63     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Hockett CF. A Manual of Phonology. Baltimore: Waverly Press; 1955.
2. Chomsky N, Miller GA. Introduction to the formal analysis of natural languages. In: Luce RD, Bush RR, Galanter E, eds. Handbook of Mathematical Psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1963, 269-321. DOI:10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00034-1.
3. Liberman AM, Cooper FS, Shankweiler DP, Studdert-Kennedy M. Perception of the speech code. Psychol Rev 1967, 74:431-461. DOI:10.1037/h0020279.
4. Potter RK. Visible patterns of sound. Science 1945, 9:463-470.
5. Cooper FS. Research on reading machines for the blind. In: Zahl PA, ed. Blindness: Modern Approaches to the Unseen Environment. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1950, 512-543.
6. Cooper FS, Borst JM, Liberman AM. Analysis and synthesis of speech-like sounds. J Acoust Soc Am 1949, 21:461-461.
7. Liberman AM, Mattingly IG. The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition 1985, 21:1-36.
8. Goldstein, L, Fowler, CA. Articulatory phonology: a phonology for public language use. In: Schiller NO, Meyer AS, eds. Phonetics and Phonology in Language Comprehension and Production. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter; 2003, 159-207.
9. Liberman AM, Harris KS, Hoffman HS, Griffith BC. The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. J Exp Psychol 1957, 54:358-368.
10. Stevens KN. Features in speech perception and lexical access. In: Pisoni DB, Remez RE, eds. Handbook of Speech Perception. Malden: Blackwell Science; 2005, 125-155.
11. Niedzielski N. The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. J Lang Social Psychol 1999, 18:62-85.
12. Johnson KA. Speaker normalization in speech perception. In: Pisoni DB, Remez RE, eds. Handbook of Speech Perception. Malden: Blackwell Science; 2005.
13. Ganong WF. Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. J Exp Psychol 1980, 6:110-125. DOI:10.1037/0096-1523.6.1.110.
14. Howes D. On the relation between the intelligibility and frequency of occurrence of English words. J Acoust Soc Am 1957, 29:296-305.
15. Oldfield RC. Things, words and the brain. Q J Exp Psychol 1966, 18:340-353.
16. Goldiamond I, Hawkins WF. Vexierversuch: the log relationship between word-frequency and recognition obtained in the absence of stimulus words. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1958, 56:457-463.
17. Luce PA, Pisoni DB. Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model. Ear Hearing 1998, 19:1-36.
18. Luce PA, Goldinger SD, Auer ET, Vitevitch MS. Phonetic priming, neighborhood activation, and PARSYN. Perception Psychophys 2000, 62:615-625.
19. Goldinger SD. Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychol Rev 1998, 105:251-279.
20. Nygaard LC, Sommers MS, Pisoni DB. Speech perception as a talker-contingent process. Psychol Sci 1994, 5:42-46.
21. Port R. How are words stored in memory? Beyond phones and phonemes. New Ideas Psychol 2007, 25: 143-170.
22. Abler WL. On the particulate principle of selfdiversifying systems. J Social Biol Struct 1989, 12:1-13.
23. Humboldt Wv. Linguistic Variability and Intellectual Development. Baltimore: University of Miami Press; 1836.
24. Fromkin VA. Slips of tongue. Sci Am 1973, 229: 110-117.
25. Mowrey RA, MacKay IRA. Phonological primitives: electromyographic speech error evidence. J Acoust Soc Am 1990, 88:1299-1312.
26. Stevens, KN. 1986., Models of phonetic recognition II: a feature-based model of speech recognition. Montreal Satellite Symposium on Speech Recognition (Twelfth International Congress of Acoustics). 67-68.
27. Jackobson R, Fant G, Halle M. Preliminaries to Speech Analysis: The Distinctive Features. Cambridge: MIT; 1952.
28. Chomsky N, Halle M. The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row; 1968.
29. Fowler CA. Listeners do hear sounds, not tongues. J Acoust Soci Am 1996, 99:1730-1741. DOI:10. 1121/1.415237.
30. Borden GJ, Harris KS, Raphael LJ. Speech Science Primer: Physiology, Acoustics and Perception of Speech. 4th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003.
31. Lisker L, Abramson AS, Cooper FS, Schvery MH. Transillumination of the larynx in running speech. J Acoust Soc Am 1969, 45:1544-1546. DOI:10.1121/ 1.1911636.
32. Perkell JS. Physiology of Speech Production: Results and Implications of a Quantitative Cineradiographic Study. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1969.
33. Nadler, R, Abbs, JH, Fujimora, O. 1987., Speech movement research using the new x-ray microbeam system. 11th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences; Tallinn. 221-224.
34. Perkell J, Cohen M, Svirsky M, Matthies M, Garabieta I, et al. Electromagnetic mid-sagittal articulometer (EMMA) systems for transducing speech articulatory movements. J Acoust Soc Am 1992, 92: 3078-3096.
35. Stone M, Lundberg A. Three-dimensional tongue surface shapes of English consonants and vowels. J Acoust Soc Am 1996, 99:3728-3737.
36. Stone M. A guide to analysing tongue motion from ultrasound images. Clin Linguist Phon 2005, 19: 455-501.
37. Goldstein L, Pouplier M, Chen L, Saltzman E, Byrd D. Dynamic action units in speech production errors. Cognition 2007, 103:386-412. DOI:10.1016/ j.cognition.2006.05.010.
38. Browman C, Goldstein L. Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech. In: Kingston J, Beckman M, eds. Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the Grammar and the Physics of Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990, 341-376.
39. Fowler CA. An event approach to the study of speechperception from a direct realist perspective. J Phon 1986, 14:3-28.
40. Rizzolatti G, Fadiga L, Gallese V, Fogassi L. Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cogn Brain Res 1996, 3:131-141.
41. Lindblom, BEF. Explaning phonetic variation: a sketch of H&H theory. In: Hardcastle HJ, Marchal A, eds. Speech Production and Speech Modeling, NATO ASI Series D: Behavioural and Social Sciences. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press; 1990, 403-439.
42. Kent RD, Netsell R. Effects of stress contrasts on certain articulatory parameters. Phonetica 1971, 24: 23-44.
43. de Jong K. The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: Linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation. J Acoust Soc Am 1995, 97:491-504.
44. de Jong K. Stress, lexical focus, and segmental focus in English: patterns of variation in vowel duration. J Phon 2004, 32:493-516. DOI:10.1016/j.wocn. 2004.05.002.
45. Moore RK. Spoken language processing: piecing together the puzzle. Speech Commun 2007, 49: 418-435.
46. Wilson EO. Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. New York: Knopf; 1998.
47. Denes P, Pinson E. The Speech Chain. Garden City: Anchor Press/Doubleday; 1963.
48. Mattingly, IG, Liberman, AM. Specialized perceiving systems for speech and other biologically significant sounds. In: Edelman GM, Gall E, Cowan WM, eds. Auditory Function: Neurological Bases of Hearing: New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1988, 775-793.
49. Kluender, KR. Speech perception as a tractable problem in cognitive science. In: Gernsbacher M, ed. Handbook of Psycholinguistics. San Diego: Academic Press; 1994, 172-217.
50. Diehl RL, Lotto AJ, Holt LL. Speech perception. Annu Rev Psychol 2004, 55:149-179.
51. Sumby WH, Pollack I. Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1954, 26: 212-215.
52. Geers A, Brenner C. Speech perception results: audition and lipreading enhancement. Volta Rev 1994, 96:97-108.
53. Lachs L, Pisoni DB, Kirk KI. Use of audiovisual information in speech perception by prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants: a first report. Ear Hearing 2001, 22:236-251.
54. Bergeson, TR, Pisoni, DB. Audiovisual speech perception in deaf adults and children following cochlear implantation. In: Calvert GA, Spence C, Stein BE, eds. The Handbook of Multisensory Processes. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2004, 749-772.
55. McGurk H, McDonald J. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 1976, 264:746-748.
56. Fowler CA, Dekle DJ. Listening with eye and hand: crossmodal contributions to speech perception. J Exp Psychol 1996, 17:816-828.
57. Rosenblum LD, Schmuckler MA, Johnson JA. The McGurk effect in infants. Percept Psychophys 1997, 59:347-357.
58. Gregory SW, Webster S. A nonverbal signal in voices of interview partners effectively predicts communication accomodation and social status perceptions. J Pers Soc Psychol 1996, 70:1231-1240.
59. Lane H, Tranel B. The Lombard sign and the role of hearing in speech. J Speech Hearing Res 1971, 4:677-709.
60. Houde JF, Jordan MI. Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production. Science 1998, 279:1213-1216.
61. Houde JF, Jordan MI. Sensoriomotor adaptation of speech I: compensation and adaptation. J Speech Hearing Res 2002, 45:295-310.
62. Villacorta VM, Perkell J, Guenther FH. Sensorimotor adaptation to feedback perturbations of vowel acoustics and its relation to perception. J Acoust Soc Am 2007, 122:2306-2319. DOI:10.1121/1.2773966.
63. Levelt WJ, Roelofs A, Meyer AS. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behav Brain Sci 1999, 22:1-75.
64. Kawato M. Adaptation and learning in control of voluntary movement by the central nervous system. Adv Robot 1989, 3:229-249.
65. Halle M, Stevens KN. Speech recognition: a model and a program for research. IRE Trans Information Theory 1962, 8:155-159. DOI:10.1109/TIT.1962.1057686.
66. Rizzolatti G, Sinigaglia C. Mirrors in the Brain: How our Minds Share Actions and Emotions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
67. Fadiga L, Craighero L, Buccino G, Rizzolatti G. Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: a TMS study. Eur J Neurosci 2002, 15:399-402. DOI:10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001. 01874.x.
68. Cooper FS, Liberman AM, Borst JM. The interconversion of audible and visible patterns as a basis for research in the perception of speech. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1951, 37:318-325.
69. Liberman AM. Some results of research on speech perception. J Acoust Soc Am 1957, 29(1):117-123.
70. Cleary M, Pisoni DB. Speech perception and spoken word recognition: Research and theory. Pp 499-534 in Goldstein EB, ed. Handbook of Perception. 2001. Blackwell Publishers Inc., Malden, MA.
71. Johnson K, Mullinex JW, eds. Talker Variability in Speech Processing. San Diego: Academic Press; 1997.
72. Pisoni DB, Remez RE, eds. The Handbook of Speech Perception. Malden: Blackwell Sciece; 2005.
73. Lagefoged P. A Course in Phonetics. 5th ed. Boston: Thomson/Wadsworth; 2005.
74. Stevens KN. Acoustic Phonetics. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1998.
75. Bradlow AR, Pisoni DB, Akahane-Yamada R, Tohkura Y. Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. J Acoust SocAm 1997 101: 2299-2310.
76. Iacoboni, M. Mirroring People: The New Science of How we Connect with Others. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux; 2008.