Sensorimotor adaptation to feedback perturbations of vowel acoustics and its relation to perception

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 122, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 2306-2319

  Villacorta, Virgilio M ^a,c   Perkell, Joseph S ^a,b   Guenther, Frank H ^a,b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Irvine Sensors Corporation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEEDBACK CONTROL; NATURAL FREQUENCIES; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; SPEECH PRODUCTION AIDS;

CONSONANT-VOWEL-CONSONANT (CVC) WORDS; FEEDBACK PERTURBATIONS; FORMANT FREQUENCY (F1); SENSORIMOTOR ADAPTATION; SPEECH MOTOR CONTROL; VOWEL ACOUSTICS;

ACOUSTIC WAVES;

ACOUSTICS; ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; CONSONANT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HEARING ACUITY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; SIMULATION; SPECTROSCOPY; SPEECH; VOWEL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MOTOR CORTEX; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHONATION; PHONETICS; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; SPEECH; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT;

EID: 34848828488     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.2773966     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Abbs, J. H., and Gracco, V. L. (1984). " Control of complex motor gestures: Orofacial muscle responses to load perturbations of lip during speech., " J. Neurophysiol. 51, 705-723.
2. Bedford, F. L. (1989). " Constraints on learning new mappings between perceptual dimensions., " J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 15, 232-248.
3. Bhushan, N., and Shadmehr, R. (1999). " Computational nature of human adaptive control during learning of reaching movements in force fields., " Biol. Cybern. 81, 39-60.
4. Blakemore, S. J., Goodbody, S. J., and Wolpert, D. M. (1998). " Predicting the consequences of our own actions: The role of sensorimotor context estimation., " J. Neurosci. 18, 7511-7518.
5. Burnett, T. A., Freedland, M. B., Larson, C. R., and Hain, T. C. (1998). " Voice F0 responses to manipulations in pitch feedback., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 3153-3161.
6. Callan, D. E., Kent, R. D., Guenther, F. H., and Vorperian, H. K. (2000). " An auditory - feedback based neural network model of speech production that is robust to developmental changes in the size and shape of the articulatory system., " J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 43, 721-736.
7. Fujimura, O., and Kakita, Y. (1979). " Remarks on quantitative description of lingual articulation., " in Frontiers of Speech Communication Research, edited by, B. Lindblom, and, S. Öhman, (Academic, San Diego), pp. 17-24.
8. Guenther, F. H. (1995). " Speech sound acquisition, coarticulation, and rate effects in a neural network model of speech production., " Psychol. Rev. 102, 594-621.
9. Guenther, F. H. (1994). " A neural network model of speech acquisition and motor equivalent speech production., " Biol. Cybern. 72, 43-53
10. Guenther, F. H., Espy-Wilson, C. Y., Boyce, S. E., Matthies, M. L., Zandipour, M., and Perkell, J. S. (1999b). " Articulatory tradeoffs reduce acoustic variability during American English /r/ production., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 2854-2865.
11. Guenther, F. H., Ghosh, S. S., and Tourville, J. A. (2006). " Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production., " Brain Lang 96, 280-301.
12. Guenther, F. H., Hampson, M., and Johnson, D. (1998). " A theoretical investigation of reference frames for the planning of speech movements., " Psychol. Rev. 105, 611-633.
13. Guenther, F. H., Husain, F. T., Cohen, M. A., and Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. (1999a). " Effects of categorization and discrimination training on auditory perceptual space., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 2900-2912.
14. Guenther, F. H., Nieto-Castanon, A., Ghosh, S. S., and Tourville, J. A. (2004). " Representation of sound categories in auditory cortical maps., " J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 47, 46-57.
15. Honda, M., and Murano, E. (2003). " Effects of tactile and auditory feedback on compensatory articulatory response to an unexpected palatal perturbation., " Proceedings of the Sixth Speech Production Seminar, Sydney, Australia,, Dec. 7-10, 2003.
16. Houde, J. F., and Jordan, M. I. (1998). " Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production., " Science 279, 1213-l216.
17. Houde, J. F., and Jordan, M. I. (2002). " Sensorimotor adaptation of speech I: Compensation and adaptation., " J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 45, 295-310.
18. Jones, J. A., and Munhall, K. G. (2000). " Perceptual calibration of F0 production: Evidence from feedback perturbation., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108, 1246-1251.
19. Kawahara, H. (1993). " Transformed auditory feedback: Effects of fundamental frequency perturbation., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94, 1883-1884.
20. Kawato, M., and Gomi, H. (1992). " The cerebellum and VOR/OKR learning models., " Trends Neurosci. 15, 445-453.
21. Lane, H. L., and Tranel, B. W. (1971). " The Lombard sign and the role of hearing in speech., " J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 14, 677-709.
22. Lindblom, B. E. F., Lubker, J. F., and Gay, T. (1979). " Formant frequencies of some fixed-mandible vowels and a model of speech motor programming by predictive simulation., " J. Phonetics 7, 147-161.
23. Macmillan, N. A., and Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection Theory: A User's Guide, 2nd ed. (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ).
24. Maeda, S. (1990). " Compensatory articulation during speech: Evidence from the analysis and synthesis of vocal-tract shapes using an articulatory model., " in Speech Production and Speech Modeling, edited by, W. J. Hardcastle, and, A. Marchal, (Kluwer, Dordrecht), pp. 131-149.
25. Markel, J. D., and Gray, A. H. (1976). Linear Prediction of Speech (Springer-Verlag, New York).
26. Max, L., Wallace, M. E., and Vincent, I. (2003). " Sensorimotor adaptation to auditory perturbations during speech: Acoustic and kinematic experiments., " Proceedings of the 15th Internatiional Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, pp. 1053-1056.
27. Miller, J. D. (1989). " Auditory-perceptual interpretation of the vowel., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, pp. 2114-2134.
28. Newman, R. S. (2003). " Using links between speech perception and speech production to evaluate different acoustic metrics: A preliminary report., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113, 2850-2860.
29. Nieto-Castanon, A., Guenther, F. H., Perkell, J., and Curtin, H. D. (2005). " A modeling investigation of articulatory variability and acoustic stability during American English /r/ production., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 3196-3212.
30. Oppenheim, A. V., and Schafer, R. W. (1999). Discrete-Time Signal Processing, 2nd ed. (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).
31. Perkell, J. S. (1996). " Properties of the tongue help to define vowel categories: Hypotheses based on physiologically oriented modeling., " J. Phonetics 24, 3-22.
32. Perkell, J. S., Guenther, F. H., Lane, H., Matthies, M. L., Stockmann, E. S., and Tiede, M. (2004a). " The distinctness of speakers' productions of vowel contrasts is related to their discrimination of the contrasts., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 2338-2344.
33. Perkell, J. S., Matthies, M. L., Tiede, M., Lane, H., Zandipour, M., and Marrone, N. (2004b). " The distinctness of speakers' s-∫ contrast is related to their auditory discrimination and use of an articulatory saturation effect., " J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 47, 1259-1269.
34. Porschmann, C. (2000). " Influences of bone conduction and air conduction on the sound of one's own voice., " Acta Acust. (Beijing) 86, 1038-1045.
35. Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., and Flannery, B. P. (2002). Numerical Recipes in C, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
36. Purcell, D. W., and Munhall, K. G. (2006). " Adaptive control of vowel formant frequency: Evidence from real-time formant manipulation., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 966-977.
37. Savariaux, C., Perrier, P., and Orliaguet, J. P. (1995). " Compensation strategies for the perturbation of the rounded vowel [u] using a lip tube: A study of the control space in speech production., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 2428-2842.
38. Tourville, J. A., Guenther, F. H., Ghosh, S. S., and Bohland, J. W. (2004). " Effects of jaw perturbation on cortical activity during speech production., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 2631 (A).
39. Vallabha, G. K., and Tuller, B. (2002). " Systematic errors in the formant analysis of steady-state vowels., " Speech Commun. 38, 141-160.
40. Villacorta, V. M. (2006). " Sensorimotor adaptation to perturbations of vowel acoustics and its relation to perception., " Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
41. Welch, R. B. (1978). Perceptual Modification: Adapting to Altered Sensory Environments (Academic, New York).
42. Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., and Jordan, M. I. (1995). " Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study., " Exp. Brain Res. 103, 460-470.
43. Wolpert, D. M., and Kawato, M. (1998). " Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control., " Neural Networks 1217, 1-13.
44. Xu, Y., Larson, C. R., Bauer, J. J., and Hain, T. C. (2004). " Compensation for pitch-shifted auditory feedback during the production of Mandarin tone sequences., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 1168-1178.
45. Yates, A. J. (1963). " Delayed auditory feedback., " Psychol. Bull. 60, 213-232.