Correction of confounding bias in non-randomized studies by appropriate weighting

Biometrical Journal

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 369-387

  Schmoor, Claudia ^a   Gall, Christine ^a   Stampf, Susanne ^a   Graf, Erika ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Instrumental variable; Non randomized studies; Propensity score; Randomized controlled trials; Regression model

Indexed keywords

CLASSICAL APPROACH; CONFOUNDER; COVARIATES; INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES; MULTIPLE REGRESSION MODELLING; NON-RANDOMIZED STUDY; PROPENSITY SCORE; RANDOMISATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REGRESSION MODELLING;

REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 79952205430     PISSN: 03233847     EISSN: 15214036     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201000154     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W. and Rubin, D. B. (1996). Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association 91, 444-455.
2. Austin, P. (2007). The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios. Statistics in Medicine 26, 3078-3094.
3. Bang, H. and Davis, C. E. (2007). On estimating treatment effects under non-compliance in randomized clinical trials: are intent-to-treat or instrumental variable analyses perfect solutions? Statistics in Medicine 26, 954-964.
4. Benson, K. and Hartz, A. J. (2000). A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials. New England Journal of Medicine 342, 1878-1886.
5. Bosco J. L. F., Silliman, R. A., Thwin, S. S., Geiger, A. M., Buist, D. S. M., Prout, M. N., Yood, M. U., Haque, R., Wei, F. and Lash, T. L. (2010). A most stubborn bias: no adjustment method fully resolves confounding by indication in observational studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 63, 64-74.
6. Brookhart, M. A., Rassen, J. A. and Schneeweiss, S. (2010). Instrumental variable methods in comparative safety and effectiveness research. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 19, 537-554.
7. Brookhart, M. A., Wang, P. S., Solomon, D. H. and Schneeweiss, S. (2006). Evaluating short-term drug effects using physician-specific prescribing preference as an instrumental variable. Epidemiology 17, 268-275.
8. Concato, J., Nirav Shah, M. P. H. and Horwitz, R. I. (2000). Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. New England Journal of Medicine 342, 1887-1892.
9. D'Agostino, R. B. (1998). Tutorial in biostatistics: propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Statistics in Medicine 17, 2265-2281.
10. Gail, M., Wieand, S. and Piantadosi, S. (1984). Biased estimates of treatment effect in randomized experiments with nonlinear regressions and omitted covariates. Biometrika 71, 431-444.
11. Gall, C., Caputo, A. and Schumacher, M. (2010). Comparison of Marginal Structural Models to a missing data approach illustrated by data on breast cancer chemotherapy. FDM Preprint No. 103, University of Freiburg.
12. Graf, E. and Schumacher, M. (2008). Comments on "The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios". Statistics in Medicine 27, 3915-3917.
13. Greenland, S. (2000). An introduction to instrumental variables for epidemiologists. International Journal of Epidemiology 29, 722-729.
14. Greenland, S., Robins, J. and Pearl, J. (1999). Confounding and collapsibility in causal inference. Statistical Science 14, 29-46.
15. Hadley, J., Yabroff, K. R., Barrett, M. J., Penson, D. F., Saigal, C. S. and Potosky, A. L. (2010). Comparative effectiveness of prostate cancer treatments: evaluating statistical adjustments for confounding in observational data. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 102, 1780-1793.
16. Hernan, M. A. and Robins, J. M. (2006). Instruments for causal inference: an epidemiologist's dream? Epidemiology 17, 360-372.
17. Holland, P. W. (1986). Statistics and causal inference (C/R: P961-970). Journal of the American Statistical Association 81, 945-960.
18. Horvitz, D. G. and Thompson, D. J. (1952). A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe. Journal of the American Statistical Association 47, 663-685.
19. Imbens, G. W. (2004). Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: a review. The Review of Economics and Statistics 86, 4-29.
20. Ioannidis, J. P. A., Haidich, A. B., Pappa, M., Kokori, S. I., Tektonidou, M. G., Contopoulos-Ioannidis, D. G. and Lau, J. (2001). Comparison of evidence of treatment effects in randomized an nonrandomized studies. Journal of the American Medical Association 286, 821-830.
21. Johnston, S. C., Henneman, T., McCulloch, C. E. and van der Lann, M. (2002). Modelling treatment effects on binary outcomes with grouped-treatment variables and individual covariates. American Journal of Epidemiology 156, 753-760.
22. Klungel, O. H., Martens, E. P., Psaty, B. M., Grobbee, D. E., Sullivan, S. D., Stricker, B. H. Ch., Leufkens, H. G. M. and de Boer, A. (2004). Methods to assess intended effects of drug treatment in observational studies are reviewed. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 57, 1223-1231.
23. Kunz, R. and Oxman, A. D. (1998). The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials. British Medical Journal 317, 1185-1190.
24. Little, R. J. and Rubin, D. B. (2000). Causal effects in clinical and epidemiological studies via potential outcomes: concepts and analytical approaches. Annual Review of Public Health 21, 121-145.
25. Lunceford, J. K. and Davidian, M. (2004). Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: a comparative study. Statistics in Medicine 23, 2937-2960.
26. Martens, E. P., Pestman, W. R., de Boer, A., Berlitser, S. V. and Klungel, O. H. (2006). Instrumental variables: applications and limitations. Epidemiology 17, 260-267.
27. Martens, E., Pestman, W., de Boer, A., Belitzer, S. and Klungel, O. (2008). Systematic differences in treatment effect estimates between propensity score methods and logistic regression. International Journal of Epidemiology 37, 1142-1147.
28. McKee, M., Britton, A., Black, N., McPjerson, K., Sanderson, C. and Blain, C. (1999). Interpreting the evidence: choosing between randomised and non-randomised studies. British Medical Journal 319, 312-315.
29. Newhouse, J. P. and McClellan, M. (1998). Econometrics in outcome research: the use of instrumental variables. Annual Review of Public Health 19, 17-34.
30. Rassen, J. A., Brookhart, M. A., Glynn, R. J., Mittleman, M. A. and Schneeweiss, S. (2009). Instrumental variables I: instrumental variables exploit natural variation in nonexperimental data to estimate causal relationships. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 62, 1226-1232.
31. Robins, J. M., Hernan, M. A. and Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology 11, 550-560.
32. Rosenbaum, P. R. and Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70, 41-55.
33. Rosenbaum, P. R. and Rubin, D. B. (1984). Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association 79, 516-524.
34. Rubin, D. (2007). The design versus the analysis of observational studies for causal effects: parallels with the design of randomized trials. Statistics in Medicine 26, 20-36.
35. Schmoor, C., Caputo, A. and Schumacher, M. (2008). Evidence from nonrandomized studies: a case study on the estimation of causal effects. American Journal of Epidemiology 167, 1120-1129.
36. Schmoor, C., Olschewski, M. and Schumacher, M. (1996). Randomized and non-randomized patients in clinical trials: experiences with comprehensive cohort studies. Statistics in Medicine 15, 263-271.
37. Schmoor, C. and Schumacher, M. (1997). Effects of covariate omission and categorization when analysing randomized trials with the Cox model. Statistics in Medicine 16, 225-237.
38. Schumacher, M., Olschewski, M. and Schmoor, C. (1987). The impact of heterogeneity on the comparison of survival times. Statistics in Medicine 6, 773-784.
39. Senn, S., Graf, E. and Caputo, A. (2007). Stratification for the propensity score compared with linear regression techniques to assess the effect of treatment or exposure. Statistics in Medicine 26, 5529-5544. Correction 27, 4615.
40. Shah, B., Laupacis, A., Hux, J. and Austin, P. (2005). Propensity score methods gave similar results to traditional regression modeling in observational studies: a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 58, 550-559.
41. Smith, C. T., Williamson, P. R. and Marson, A. G. (2005). Investigating heterogeneity in an individual patient data meta-analysis of time to event outcomes. Statistics in Medicine 24, 1307-1319.
42. Stampf, S., Graf, E., Schmoor, C. and Schumacher, M. (2010). Estimators and confidence intervals for the marginal odds ratio using logistic regression and propensity score stratification. Statistics in Medicine 29, 760-769.
43. Stukel, T. A., Fisher, E. S., Wennberg, D. E., Alter, D. A., Gottlieb, D. J. and Vermeulen, M. J. (2007). Analysis of observational studies in the presence of treatment selction bias: effects of invasive cardiac management on AMI survival using propensity score and instrumental variable methods. Journal of the American Medical Association 297, 278-285.
44. Stürmer, T., Joshi, M., Glynn, R. J., Avorn, J., Rothmann, K. J. and Schneeweiss, S. (2006). A review of the application of propensity score methods yielded increasing use, advantages in specific settings, but not substantially different estimates compared with conventional multivariable methods. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 59, 437-461.
45. Sussman, J. B. and Hayward, R. A. (2010). Using instrumental variables to adjust for treatment contamination in randomised controlled trials. British Medical Journal 340, 1181-1184.
46. Theil, H. (1971). Principles of Econometrics. Wiley, New York.
47. Thompson, S. G. and Sharp, S. J. (1999). Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods. Statistics in Medicine 18, 2693-2708.