Psychometric properties of presenteeism scales for musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review

Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 23-31

  Roy, Jean Sébastien ^a,b   Desmeules, François ^c   MacDermid, Joy C ^d,e  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^b CENTER FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH IN REHABILITATION AND SOCIAL INTEGRATION   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^d MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^e ST JOSEPH S HEALTH CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Musculoskeletal disorders; Questionnaires; Reliability; Systematic review; Validity, work

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTHRITIS; HUMAN; MEDICAL LEAVE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRODUCTIVITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION; WORK; WORK CAPACITY;

ADULT; ARTHRITIS; EFFICIENCY; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REHABILITATION, VOCATIONAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SICK LEAVE; WORK; WORK CAPACITY EVALUATION;

EID: 79952199627     PISSN: 16501977     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0643     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Yelin E. Cost of musculoskeletal diseases: impact of work disability and functional decline. J Rheumatol Suppl 2003;68:8-11. (Pubitemid 37549313)
2. Aronsson G, Gustafsson K, Dallner M. Sick but yet at work. An empirical study of sickness presenteeism. J Epidemiol Community Health 2000;54:502-509. (Pubitemid 30392274)
3. McKevitt C, Morgan M, Dundas R, Holland WW. Sickness absence and 'working through' illness: a comparison of two professional groups. J Public Health Med 1997;19:295-300. (Pubitemid 27460283)
4. Koopman C, Pelletier KR, Murray JF, Sharda CE, Berger ML, Turpin RS, et al. Stanford presenteeism scale: health status and employee productivity. J Occup Environ Med 2002;44:14-20. (Pubitemid 34052802)
5. Beaton D, Bombardier C, Escorpizo R, Zhang W, Lacaille D, Boonen A, et al. Measuring worker productivity: frameworks and measures. J Rheumatol 2009;36:2100-2109.
6. Williams RM, Schmuck G, Allwood S, Sanchez M, Shea R, Wark G. Psychometric evaluation of health-related work outcome measures for musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil 2007;17:504-521. (Pubitemid 47340997)
7. Prasad M, Wahlqvist P, Shikiar R, Shih YC. A review of selfreport instruments measuring health-related work productivity: a patient-reported outcomes perspective. Pharmacoeconomics 2004;22:225-244. (Pubitemid 38393392)
8. Beaton DE, Tang K, Gignac MA, Lacaille D, Badley EM, Anis AH, et al. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of five at-work productivity measures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2010;62:28-37.
9. Tang K, Pitts S, Solway S, Beaton D. Comparison of the psychometric properties of four at-work disability measures in workers with shoulder or elbow disorders. J Occup Rehabil 2009;19:142-154.
10. Law M, MacDermid J. Evidence-based rehabilitation: a guide to practice. 2nd edn. Thorofare, NJ: Slack Inc.; 2008.
11. Roy JS, MacDermid JC, Woodhouse LJ. Measuring shoulder function: a systematic review of four questionnaires. Arthritis Rheum 2009;61:623-632.
12. Roy JS, MacDermid JC, Woodhouse LJ. A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the Constant-Murley score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009;19:157-164.
13. MacDermid JC, Walton DM, Avery S, Blanchard A, Etruw E, McAlpine C, et al. Measurement properties of the neck disability index: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2009;39:400-417.
14. Bot SD, Terwee CB, van der Windt DA, Bouter LM, Dekker J, de Vet HC. Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Rheum Dis 2004;63:335-341. (Pubitemid 38453296)
15. Finch E, Brooks D, Stratford PW, Mayo NE. Why measurement properties are important. In: BC Decker Inc., editor. Physical rehabilitation outcome measures: a guide to enhanced clinical decision making. Hamilton: Canadian Physiotherapy Association; 2002, p. 26-41.
16. Endicott J, Nee J. Endicott Work Productivity Scale (EWPS): a new measure to assess treatment effects. Psychopharmacol Bull 1997;33:13-16. (Pubitemid 27184189)
17. Turpin RS, Ozminkowski RJ, Sharda CE, Collins JJ, Berger ML, Billotti GM, et al. Reliability and validity of the Stanford Presenteeism Scale. J Occup Environ Med 2004;46:1123-1133. (Pubitemid 39518492)
18. Gignac MA, Badley EM, Lacaille D, Cott CC, Adam P, Anis AH. Managing arthritis and employment: making arthritis-related work changes as a means of adaptation. Arthritis Rheum 2004;51:909-916. (Pubitemid 39648182)
19. Gignac MA, Cao X, Lacaille D, Anis AH, Badley EM. Arthritisrelated work transitions: a prospective analysis of reported productivity losses, work changes, and leaving the labor force. Arthritis Rheum 2008;59:1805-1813.
20. Gilworth G, Chamberlain MA, Harvey A, Woodhouse A, Smith J, Smyth MG, et al. Development of a work instability scale for rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2003;49:349-354. (Pubitemid 36682402)
21. Lerner D, Amick BC, III, Rogers WH, Malspeis S, Bungay K, Cynn D. The Work Limitations Questionnaire. Med Care 2001;39:72-85.
22. Lerner D, Reed JI, Massarotti E, Wester LM, Burke TA. The Work Limitations Questionnaire's validity and reliability among patients with osteoarthritis. J Clin Epidemiol 2002;55:197-208. (Pubitemid 34051533)
23. Amick BC, III, Habeck RV, Ossmann J, Fossel AH, Keller R, Katz JN. Predictors of successful work role functioning after carpal tunnel release surgery. J Occup Environ Med 2004;46:490-500. (Pubitemid 38623688)
24. Gallasch CH, Alexandre NM, Amick B, III. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the work role functioning questionnaire to Brazilian Portuguese. J Occup Rehabil 2007;17:701-711. (Pubitemid 350132273)
25. Durand MJ, Vachon B, Hong QN, Imbeau D, Amick BC 3rd, Loisel P. The cross-cultural adaptation of the Work Role Functioning Questionnaire in Canadian French. Int J Rehabil Res 2004;27:261-268. (Pubitemid 40053635)
26. Walker N, Michaud K, Wolfe F. Work limitations among working persons with rheumatoid arthritis: results, reliability, and validity of the work limitations questionnaire in 836 patients. J Rheumatol 2005;32:1006-1012. (Pubitemid 40828070)
27. McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 1995;4:293-307.
28. Yamashita M, Arakida M. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Stanford Presenteeism Scale in female employees at 2 Japanese enterprises. J Occup Health 2008;50:66-69. (Pubitemid 351680010)
29. Tang K, Beaton DE, Lacaille D, Gignac MA, Zhang W, Anis AH, et al. The Work Instability Scale for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA-WIS): does it work in osteoarthritis? Qual Life Res 2010;19:1057-1068.
30. Gilworth G, Emery P, Gossec L, Vliet Vlieland TP, Breedveld FC, Hueber AJ, et al. Adaptation and cross-cultural validation of the rheumatoid arthritis work instability scale (RA-WIS). Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:1686-1690.
31. Macedo A, Oakley S, Gullick N, Kirkham B. An examination of work instability, functional impairment, and disease activity in employed patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2009;36:225-230.
32. Tang K, Beaton DE, Gignac MA, Lacaille D, Zhang W, Bombardier C. The work instability scale for rheumatoid arthritis predicts arthritis-related work transitions within 12 months. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2010;62:1578-1587.
33. Uguz S, Inanc BY, Yerlikaya EE, Aydin H. [Reliability and validity of Turkish form of Endicott Work Productivity Scale]. Turk Psikiyatri Derg 2004;15:209-214 (in Turkish).
34. De Soarez PC, Kowalski CC, Ferraz MB, Ciconelli RM. [Translation into Brazilian Portuguese and validation of the Work Limitations Questionnaire]. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2007;22:21-28 (in Portoguese). (Pubitemid 350017527)
35. Escorpizo R, Cieza A, Beaton D, Boonen A. Content comparison of worker productivity questionnaires in arthritis and musculoskeletal conditions using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Framework. J Occup Rehabil 2009;19:382-397.
36. Williams RM, Myers AM. Functional Abilities Confidence Scale: a clinical measure for injured workers with acute low back pain. Phys Ther 1998;78:624-634. (Pubitemid 28252601)
37. Kopec JA, Esdaile JM. Occupational role performance in persons with back pain. Disabil Rehabil 1998;20:3-379.
38. Beaton DE, Kennedy CA. Beyond return to work: testing a measure of at-work disability in workers with musculoskeletal pain. Qual Life Res 2005;14:1869-1879. (Pubitemid 41279609)