Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the work role functioning questionnaire to Brazilian Portuguese

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 701-711

  Gallasch, Cristiane Helena ^a   Alexandre, Neusa Maria Costa ^a   Amick III, Benjamin ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b Institute of Work and Health   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Cross cultural comparison; Ergonomics; Musculoskeletal diseases; Occupational health nursing; Work capacity evaluation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAZIL; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTENT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CRONBACH ALPHA COEFFICIENT; CULTURAL FACTOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; LANGUAGE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE; PORTUGAL; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRETEST POSTTEST DESIGN; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; WORK CAPACITY; WORK ROLE FUNCTIONING QUESTIONNAIRE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BRAZIL; CULTURAL COMPETENCY; CULTURE; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMAN ENGINEERING; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH NURSING; PORTUGAL; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; WORK CAPACITY EVALUATION;

EID: 36248951200     PISSN: 10530487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10926-007-9103-2     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Amick BC III, Lerner D, Rogers WH, Rooney T, Katz JN. A review of health-related work outcome measures and their uses, and recommended measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3152-60.
2. Walsh IAP, Franco RN, Canetti EEF, Alem MER, Coury HJCG. Capacidade para o trabalho em indivíduos com lesões músculo- esqueléticas crônicas. Revista de Saude Publica. 2004;38(2):149-56.
3. Durand MJ, Vachon B, Hong QN, Imbeau D, Amick BC III, Loisel P. The cross- cultural adaptation of the work role functioning questionnaire in canadian french. Int J Rehabil 2004;27(4):261-8.
4. Lerner D, Amick BC III, Lee JC, Rooney T, Rogers WH, Chang H, et al. Relationship of employee-reported work limitations to work productivity. Med Care 2003;41(5):649-59.
5. Amick BC III, Habeck RV, Ossmann J, Fossel AH, Keller R, Katz JN. Predictors of successful work role functioning alter carpal tunnel release surgery. J Occupat Environ Med 2004;46(5):490-500.
6. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Bosi Ferraz M. Guidelines for the process of cross- cultural adaptation of self-reports measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186-91.
7. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993;46(12):1029-35.
8. Hutchinson A, Bentzen N, Konig-Zanhn C. Cross cultural health outcome assessment: a user's guide. The Netherlands: ERGHO; 1996.
9. Guillemin F. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of health status measures. Scand J Rheumatol 1995;24(2):61-3.
10. Alexandre NMC, Guirardello EB. Adaptación cultural de instrumentos utilizados en salud ocupacional. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública. 2002;11(2):109-11.
11. Lobiondo-Wood G, Haber J. Reliability and validity. In: Lobiondo-Wood G, Haber J, editors. Nursing research: methodos, critical appraisal, and utilization. 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1998. pp. 327-50.
12. Burns N, Grove SK. The practice of nursing research. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1997.
13. Ciconelli RM, Ferraz MB, Santos W, Meinão I, Quaresma MR. Tradução para a língua portuguesa e validação do questinário genérico de avaliação de qualidade de vida SF-36 (Brasil SF-36). Revista Brasileria de Reumatologia. 1999;39(3):143-50.
14. Polit DF, Hungler BP. Fundamentos de pesquisa em enfermagem. 3rd ed. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas; 1995.
15. Dempsey PA, Dempsey AD. Using nursing research: Process, critical evaluation and utilization. Baltimore: Lippincott; 2000.
16. Nunnaly JC. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
17. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 1981. p. 321.
18. Hébert F. Les indicateurs de lésions em santé et sécurité au travaiul: analyses par secteur d'activité économique em 1991. Montreaul: Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé em santé et sécurité au travail 1996.
19. Baldwin ML. Reducing the costs of work-related musculoskeletal disorders: targeting strategies to chronic disability cases. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2004;14:33-41.
20. Picavet HSJ, Hoeymans N. Health related quality of life in multiple musculoskeletal diseases: SF-36 and EQ-5D in the DCM3 study. Ann Rheum Diseases. 2004;63:723-9.
21. Roux CH, Guillemin F, Boini S, Longuetaud F, Arnault N, Hercberg S, et al. Impact of musculoskeletal disorders on quality of life: an inception cohort study. Ann Rheum Diseases 2005;64:606-11.
22. Kopec JA, Sayre EC. Work-related psychosocial factors and chronic pain: a prospective cohort study in Canadian workers. J Occupat Environ Med 2004;46(12):1263-71.