Right hand presence modulates shifts of exogenous visuospatial attention in near perihand space

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 73, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 102-109

  Lloyd, Donna M ^a   Azañón, Elena ^b   Poliakoff, Ellen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Attention; Hand; Peripersonal; Stimulus response compatibility; Visuospatial

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOOT; HAND; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL ORIENTATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; CUES; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; FOOT; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; POSTURE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77953356552     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: 10902147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Abrams R.A., Davoli C.C., Du F., Knapp W.H., Paull D. Altered vision near the hands. Cognition 2008, 107:1035-1047.
2. Azañón E., Soto-Faraco S. Changing reference frames during the encoding of tactile events. Current Biology 2008, 18:1044-1049.
3. Botvinick M., Cohen J. Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature 1998, 391:756.
4. Brown L.E., Kroliczak G., Demonet J.F., Goodale M.A. A hand in blindsight: Hand placement near target improves size perception in the blind visual field. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:786-802.
5. Brozzoli C., Pavani F., Urquizar C., Cardinali L., Farnè A. Grasping actions remap peripersonal space. Neuroreport 2009, 20:913-917.
6. di Pellegrino G., Ladavas E., Farnè A. Seeing where your hands are. Nature 1997, 388:730.
7. Dufour A., Touzalin P. Improved visual sensitivity in the perihand space. Experimental Brain Research 2008, 190:91-98.
8. Gonzalez C.L., Whitwell R.L., Morrissey B., Ganel T., Goodale M.A. Left handedness does not extend to visually guided precision grasping. Experimental Brain Research 2007, 182:275-279.
9. Graziano M.S.A., Cooke D.F. Parieto-frontal interactions, personal space, and defensive behavior. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:845-859.
10. Heilman K.M., Bowers D., Valenstein E., Watson R.T. The right hemisphere: Neuropsychological functions. Journal of Neurosurgery 1986, 64:693-704.
11. Heilman K.M., Van Den A.T. Right hemisphere dominance for attention: The mechanism underlying hemispheric asymmetries of inattention (neglect). Neurology 1980, 30:327-330.
12. Holmes N.P., Sanabria D., Calvert G.A., Spence C. Multisensory interactions follow the hands across the midline: Evidence from a non-spatial visual-tactile congruency task. Brain Research 2006, 1077:108-115.
13. Hommel B. S-R compatibility effects without response uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A - Human Experimental Psychology 1996, 49:546-571.
14. Ivanoff J., Klein R.M. The presence of a nonresponding effector increases inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2001, 8:307-314.
15. Kennett S., Spence C., Driver J. Visuo-tactile links in covert exogenous spatial attention remap across changes in unseen hand posture. Perception and Psychophysics 2002, 64:1083-1094.
16. Ladavas E. Functional and dynamic properties of visual peripersonal space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2002, 6:17-22.
17. Ladavas E., di Pellegrino G., Farnè A., Zeloni G. Neuropsychological evidence of an integrated visuotactile representation of peripersonal space in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1998, 10:581-589.
18. Leinonen L., Hyvarinen J., Nyman G., Linnankoski I. I. Functional properties of neurons in lateral part of associative area 7 in awake monkeys. Experimental Brain Research 1979, 34:299-320.
19. Lloyd D.M. Spatial limits on referred touch to an alien limb may reflect boundaries of visuo-tactile peripersonal space surrounding the hand. Brain and Cognition 2007, 64:104-109.
20. Lloyd D., Morrison I., Roberts N. Role for human posterior parietal cortex in visual processing of aversive objects in peripersonal space. Journal of Neurophysiology 2006, 95:205-214.
21. Lloyd D.M., Shore D.I., Spence C., Calvert G.A. Multisensory representation of limb position in human premotor cortex. Nature Neuroscience 2003, 6:17-18.
22. Losier B.J., Klein R.M. Covert orienting within peripersonal and extrapersonal space: Young adults. Brain Research and Cognitive Brain Research 2004, 19:269-274.
23. Makin T.R., Holmes N.P., Zohary E. Is that near my hand? Multisensory representation of peripersonal space in human intraparietal sulcus. Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 27:731-740.
24. Matsumoto E., Misaki M., Miyauchi S. Neural mechanisms of spatial stimulus-response compatibility: The effect of crossed-hand position. Experimental Brain Research 2004, 158:9-17.
25. Mesulam M.M. From sensation to cognition. Brain 1998, 121:1013-1052.
26. Michaels C.F. S-R compatibility between response position and destination of apparent motion: Evidence of the detection of affordances. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1988, 14:231-240.
27. Nicoletti R., Umilta C. Responding with hand and foot: The right/left prevalence in spatial compatibility is still present. Perception and Psychophysics 1985, 38:211-216.
28. Nicoletti R., Umilta C., Ladavas E. Compatibility due to the coding of the relative position of the effectors. Acta Psychologica 1984, 57:133-143.
29. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
30. Peters M. Attentional Asymmetries During Concurrent Bimanual Performance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A - Human Experimental Psychology 1981, 33:95-103.
31. Pierson-Savage J.M., Bradshaw J.L. Mapping of extracorporeal space by vibrotactile reaction times: A far-left-side disadvantage. Perception 1987, 16:283-290.
32. Poliakoff E., Ashworth S., Lowe C., Spence C. Vision and touch in ageing: Crossmodal selective attention and visuotactile spatial interactions. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:507-517.
33. Poliakoff E., Miles E., Li X., Blanchette I. The effect of visual threat on spatial attention to touch. Cognition 2007, 102:405-414.
34. Rabbitt P. Hand Dominance, Attention, and Choice Between Responses. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A - Human Experimental Psychology 1978, 30:407-416.
35. Reed C.L., Grubb J.D., Steele C. Hands up: Attentional prioritization of space near the hand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:166-177.
36. Rubichi S., Nicoletti R. The Simon effect and handedness: Evidence for a dominant-hand attentional bias in spatial coding. Perception and Psychophysics 2006, 68:1059-1069.
37. Schendel K., Robertson L.C. Reaching out to see: Arm position can attenuate human visual loss. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2004, 16:935-943.
38. Schicke T., Röder B. Spatial remapping of touch: Confusion of perceived stimulus order across hand and foot. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2006, 103:11808-11813.
39. Shore D.I., Spry E., Spence C. Confusing the mind by crossing the hands. Brain Research and Cognitive Brain Research 2002, 14:153-163.
40. Siman-Tov T., Mendelsohn A., Schonberg T., Avidan G., Podlipsky I., Pessoa L., et al. Bihemispheric leftward bias in a visuospatial attention-related network. Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 27:11271-11278.
41. Simon J.R. Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1969, 81:174-176.
42. Simon J.R., Rudell A.P. Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology 1967, 51:300-304.
43. Spence C.J., Driver J. Covert spatial orienting in audition: Exogenous and endogenous mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20:555-574.
44. Spence C., Nicholls M.E., Gillespie N., Driver J. Cross-modal links in exogenous covert spatial orienting between touch, audition, and vision. Perception and Psychophysics 1998, 60:544-557.
45. Spence C., Pavani F., Driver J. Crossmodal links between vision and touch in covert endogenous spatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2000, 26:1298-1319.
46. Thura D., Hadj-Bouziane F., Meunier M., Boussaoud D. Hand position modulates saccadic activity in the frontal eye field. Behavioral Brain Research 2008, 186:148-153.
47. Tipper S.P., Howard L.A., Houghton G. Action-based mechanisms of attention. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 1998, 353:1385-1393.
48. Tipper S.P., Howard L.A., Paul M.A. Reaching affects saccade trajectories. Experimental Brain Research 2001, 136:241-249.
49. Tipper S.P., Lortie C., Baylis G.C. Selective reaching: Evidence for action-centered attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1992, 18:891-905.
50. Verfaellie M., Heilman K.M. Hemispheric asymmetries in attentional control: Implications for hand preference in sensorimotor tasks. Brain and Cognition 1990, 14:70-80.